Reply With Quote
That is an entirely different discussion. Just admit you picked a terrible state to use as an example of high gun ownership rate and gun violence.
I guess I would reduce the number to 58 if you want to use a stricter characterization.
That is an entirely different discussion. Just admit you picked a terrible state to use as an example of high gun ownership rate and gun violence.
Suicide by gun is quite violent. White people need to stop living in such a corrosive culture.
When people hear "school shooting" they immediately think of Columbine, Sandy Hook, etc and saying there has been 84 "school shootings" since Sandy is extremely misleading, but that was the whole point of everytown and Mom's demand action anyways.
Give it up already.
Speak for yourself. You should try this take at PTA meetings. The guy that shot himself in the parking lot matters in discussions about school safety.
He won't admit it, tbh. He wouldn't even admit that the implication that the op was trying to present is wrong.
That guy who shot himself in the parking lot is an even rarer occurrence that mass school shootings. Mass school shootings are terrible, but the article put out by everytown/mom's demand action was disingenuous at best.
You are not even arguing the point. You ran like from the Canada numbers. That was amusing.
Anyway i am going to binge on Cowboys and Spurs. Have a ed day.
i think of someone being shot at school. I mean wouldn't you try to pimp school shootings that you think are a result of culture?
Of course you would.
Oh, I see. The culture argument can't be made for white people. It is solely your argument for minorities.
Percentage of whites in Canada?
You can make the culture argument for whites committing suicide at a higher rate and I would agree with you all day long. But suicide does not take anyone else's life so I don't really care about people who choose that path. There is a culture of violence instilled in many young African American men that needs to be addressed, why is that so hard to admit for you?
Rate of gun ownership in Canada?
Heading out of the office, need 7 points out of Jordan Reed for a 3,000 dollar fan duel win. Enjoy the game.
I think it is an issue, but probably a lot more of a broad one than you would like to think.
Reeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeed
Texas probation officer fatally shoots self in groin during target practice
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/texas-probation-officer-fatally-shoots-self-in-groin-during-target-practice/
looks like gun fellatin' Texans aren't born with gun handling genes
What gun should I buy with my winnings?Texas probation officer fatally shoots self in groin during target practice
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/texas-probation-officer-fatally-shoots-self-in-groin-during-target-practice/
looks like gun fellatin' Texans aren't born with gun handling genes
I'm thinking about pulling the trigger on this.
http://www.fnhusa.com/l/products/rifles/ballista/
argument led New Mexico sheriff's deputy to kill fellow officer
http://www.latimes.com/nation/nation...028-story.html
and NRA/GOA want drunk college students to buy guns.
Baseball bad boy José Canseco shoots off middle finger while cleaning loaded handgun
Former baseball star José Canseco accidentally shot himself in the hand Tuesday afternoon at his Las Vegas home.Police said the 50-year-old Canseco was cleaning his handgun and apparently didn’t realize it was loaded.
The gun fired, badly injuring the middle finger on his left hand, authorities said.
Canseco’s fiancée told KTNV-TV the former American League Most Valuable Player had visited a shooting range last week and forgot he left a bullet in the weapon.
Surgeons are trying to determine whether the finger must be amputated, the woman said.
The couple plans to get rid of all their guns,
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/10/b...oaded-handgun/
stupid ing gun fellators and their destructive, murderous toys.
Here's some finer haberdashery for you less, wanna-be-macho gun fellators
Wrong, NRA—Right-to-Carry Laws Actually Increase Gun Violence
A new study from researchers at Stanford University debunks the oft-cited fact that more guns leads to less crime [3]. In fact, the researchers found, the opposite is the case: right-to-carry laws are associated with higher rates of aggravated assault, rape, robbery and murder.
The results of the study are imperfect. Lead author of the study and Stanford law professor John J. Donohue III said[4], “Trying to estimate the impact of right-to-carry laws has been a vexing task over the last two decades.” While they specifically found that right-to-carry laws had yielded 8 percent more instances of aggravated assault, that number isn’t set in stone because of a number of confounding factors (such as various drug epidemics). Regardless, Donohue says that 8 percent is a low guess–the reality could be much higher.Still, the study’s findings are significant in that it pokes a hole in the gun lobby’s main argument. The Washington Post’s Christopher Ingraham provides context [5]:
The notion stems from a paper published in 1997[6] by economists John Lott and David Mus , who looked at county-level crime data from 1977 to 1992 and concluded that “allowing citizens to carry concealed weapons deters violent crimes and it appears to produce no increase in accidental deaths.” Of course, the study of gun crime has advanced significantly since then (no thanks to Congress[7]). Some researchers have gone so far as to call Lott and Mus ’s original study ”completely discredited.[8]”
One of the major critiques of the study came from the National Research Council [9], which in 2004 extended the data through the year 2000 and ultimately concluded [10] that “with the current evidence it is not possible to determine that there is a causal link between the passage of right-to-carry laws and crime rates.” Or in other words, “More guns, less crime?
Daniel Webster, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Gun Policy and Research, confirmed to the Huffington Post that the study accurately concluded that “right-to-carry laws increase firearm-related assaults,” although “the exact magnitude of that effect is uncertain.”
http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-pol...ter1027267&t=5
NRA bought enough Repug politicians so federal govt is BLOCKED from studying gun crime.
http://www.latimes.com/local/califor...113-story.html
Relaxed rules for carrying concealed guns in public may not be challenged by California state officials or advocacy groups, a federal appeals panel decided Wednesday.The decision was another victory for gun rights advocates, but it was not likely to be the last word. The state has the right to appeal Wednesday's order and legal analysts expect the state to do so. There is another pending gun case involving the right to carry concealed weapons in California and a ruling in that case could resolve the debate.
In its 2-1 ruling Wednesday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals denied an attempt by Atty. Gen. Kamala D. Harris, a gun control group and law enforcement associations to intervene in a case that struck down San Diego County's policy of tightly restricting the carrying of concealed guns. Gun owner Edward Peruta was the lead challenger of the San Diego rules.
State law allows county law enforcement agencies to set rules that limit permits for concealed guns. The 9th Circuit panel that ruled Wednesday decided on the same split vote in February that San Diego County's policy requiring law-abiding gun owners to show a specific need for protection violated the 2nd Amendment's guarantee of the right to bear arms.
TSA is one step closer to getting his CCW. She's named boutons, ain't she pretty.
Same could be said for you.
Im curious though, what makes me a sicko?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
