why you insist on people having to repeat themselves?
I don't see anything that came out of....salt water...living very long on land. The chances of them finding the right diet seems unrealistic. The chances of them fighting off disease, not good. The odds of the right % of males/females ending up on the same beach at the same time....not good.
I don't believe we came from the sea at all, and I won't be changing my mind. It's simply too damn stupid....ok?
thank you for giving us examples of science adapting and correcting itself
also, the brontosaurus (actually called apatosaurus) isn't "debunked" lol. there have been many fossils discovered of them, not just one like the video tries to claim
the statement that peppered moths do not sit on tree trunks is completely false. it is true that they used dead moths to take the pictures, but that is because of the unlikelihood of having two distinctly colored moths being found at the same time on the same tree trunk.
the book "Melanism: Evolution in Action" has pictures of living moths resting on tree trunks
i'm aware of this. so why do you keep asking for proof? it seems like a complete waste of time. it basically goes like this in an endless cycle
1) you ask for proof
2) i give proof
3) you say "I'm not going to read that"
4) i give more proof
5) you throw your hands up and say "i dont believe that and i never will"
some times passes
1) you ask for proof
2) i give proof
etc, and over and over. you like to start the argument, and everytime it heats up, you give up and say "yeah well, im not changing my mind anyway"
so why bring it up? why start this thread?
you never answer questions. its impossible to repeat what you never said.
you like to say you aren't creationist, or a believer in "intelligent design" but rather, "alternative design" and yet all the videos you keep posting promote creationism. however, in our discussions, you said you don't claim a the existence of a designer or creator, which by definition confirms you as an atheist anyway. but you keep posting creationist links despite clearly being an atheist
i've asked you many times if you think dinosaurs and humans coexisted. you still haven't answered it
So you have...proof...that yes we did come from little sea creatures? So it's now...the fact of evolution...right? So you proved that yes we all came from the sea....right?
So how can anyone fight your...facts...right?
So now that you....proved....that Darwin/evolutionists are right, I'm now on your side. How can I argue against all your....proof...?
Wait until all those who believe in God read about how ....you...proved evolution.
there is evidence that confirms that life in the sea predates life on land...
there is evidence that life can move from sea to land...
there is evidence in the fossil and genetic record that species change over time...
among many others. what would be a logical conclusion from that series of evidence?
There is no God and you are 100% right, we all evolved from fish.
Wait until Judy and her mom hear this and they share it with the church.
i never made the claim that there is no god
atheism and theism is an entirely different discussion. i think you've made this mistake about a dozen times by now
So there is a God and He needed to go with the fish evolving thing....right? You;d think He'd do things a little differently, huh?
What does the Bible say about evolving fish?
please show a fossil that proves another creature evolved from the mud fish.
lets just be clear here.
a) i'm not a believer in God
b) that is VERY different than me claiming "god doesn't exist"
c) even of there was a god, its not necessarily referring to the one the bible talks about
the mud fish that we see today are not necessarily the ancestors. they are an example of life that can adapt from sea to land and be successful
your lack of reading skills is why I avoid debating posters like yourself.
I told you I have answered every question there is about this topic.
you have already admitted to being an atheist (you made it clear you dont claim a the existence of a creator/designer), but you keep posting creationist videos. i'm just confused by the mixed signals
you have not answered if you think humans and dinosaurs coexisted
Then show me any fossil that shows any creature that evolved from any fish.
look up fossils of acanthostega and ichthyostega
I post videos that debunk the lies of Darwin I don't care if the video was produced by a Muslim or devil worshiper facts are facts no matter the source.
Why are you guys so bent against accepting evolution?
unless the source is scientific and peer reviewed. a freelance youtube video is factual to you, yet peer reviewed work isn't.
in any event, as i outlined earlier, most of the "facts" in those videos are demonstrate hilarious level of misunderstanding of what they are talking about. i'm not an evolutionary biologist but even i was able to find glaring holes in virtually every argument they made
peppered moths dont rest on trees
because evolution doesn't give avante a warm, fuzzy, and comforting feeling
also Judy forbids that sort of talk in the house
mouse is a different case. he's an atheist, but is bent on finding random youtube videos with ominous music that "debunks" evolution. i think he failed science classes in his youth and is just upset about it
Let's do get something clear...
Anyone who prefers a life without some....God...is a total and complete fool...ok? A complete moron....ok?
Now that we cleared that up, have a nice Christmas.
its not a matter of what i prefer. i would surely prefer an afterlife, that would be great. especially if it was paradise.
i also prefer to be a 7 time lottery winner. i just see no reason to believe in either. no evidence
merry christmas to you as well
You said you made up the god you pray to.
But we're the fools?
Lol
First of all, Kenichthys is based on one incomplete skull with no articulated bones, making it impossible to assemble an entire skull. The so-called internal nostril is what seems to be a notch between the premaxillary and maxillary. This notch could result from missing bone.
The lack of pictures or even illustrations of this incomplete skull makes an independent analysis impossible. Most articles on this fossil are so filled with evolutionary interpretations that they have no independently useful data. Also, the fossil is from China, where there is known to be a large fake fossil industry, and there is no indication that the authors personally found the fossil in the ground. If they bought it from a dealer, it could be a result of this fake fossil industry.
Even if they are right about the notch being an internal nostril, it is dated as 25-30 million years too old to be transitional between fish and amphibians. There are several types of lobe-finned fish that are considered ancestors to amphibians that are dated younger than Kenichthys but show no evidence of this internal nostril. This fact alone eliminates Kenichthys from being a transitional fossil between fish and amphibians.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
