Hmmmm?
I could start right now posting similiar videos and articles all saying pretty much the same thing, that being the theory of evolution is a crock of bull .
Seriously less than a minute for that almanac list?
crofl
Hmmmm?
I could start right now posting similiar videos and articles all saying pretty much the same thing, that being the theory of evolution is a crock of bull .
Last edited by Avante; 11-20-2014 at 12:20 AM.
Avante, you know all you are proving is you can spam a thread with Google.
You haven't watched any of these.
"dogs stay dogs"
we've seen wolves become dogs
bacteria stay bugs
bugs are insects
Hmmmm?
I mean I didn't watch it but I expect you to rebut every issue brought up in it right now.
coldwater media
not biased
![]()
I'm going to talk to your dumbass just so ya know....
I watch all these videos, I find them very interesting. Some I've seen more than once so as usual.....wrong.
Watch the one I posted.
It's very interesting.
Now think dummy, ok?
Remember the wolf did evolve from a sea creature.....right? So when did this start to happen?
Dude, I want nothing to do with your sickness...ok? I am forced to put up with you (like we all are) because you're a sad little with no self repect/class at all.
Now I need a shower....yuck!!!!!!!!!!!!
It's a very interesting video.
What are you afraid of?
Might be a little....ZOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOM! Over your head?
Hmmmmm?
even if i gave you indisputable evidence you would just go back to what you said earlier "i'll never change my mind." so why should i bother with somebody as close-minded as you?
i've already given the answer for the sea-to-land thing earlier today and you ignored it. scroll back a few pages and read it again
like i've already told you, a VAST majority of scientists will vouch for evolution. you can say "tons and tons" but those are still a part of a small minority.
in terms you would understand, i'm sure you can go back in history and find "tons and tons" of examples of hail mary plays being executed and resulting in a touchdown. but you and i both know that it fails most of the time, and its not even close.
so going back and giving me numerous examples of successful hail marys doesn't change the fact that its statistically an unsuccessful last gasp play
Remember there is a community laughing.
So how come sooooooooooooo many disagree with you?
So why is it we see so much stuff about all that being wrong?
Sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo many agree with him too.
You mean wrung.
David H. Bailey
1 Jan 2014 (c) 2014
It is often said that many scientists, including some with Ph.D. degrees and significant credentials in the field, now believe there are serious difficulties with modern evolutionary theory. Indeed, there are some scientists who dissent. For example, in 2005 Philip Skell, a retired chemistry professor at Pennsylvania State University and former member of the National Academy of Sciences, wrote the following [Skell2005]:
Scientific journals now do ent many scientific problems and criticisms of evolutionary theory. ... Many of the scientific criticisms of which I speak are well known by scientists in various disciplines, including the disciplines of chemistry and biochemistry, in which I have done my work. ... None of the great discoveries in biology and medicine over the past century depended on guidance from Darwinian evolution -- it provided no support. ... In my judgment, this state of affairs has persisted mainly because too many scientists were afraid to challenge what had become a philosophical orthodoxy among their colleagues. Fortunately, that is changing as many scientists are now beginning to examine the evidence for neo-Darwinism more openly and critically in scientific journals.
They just keep coming....
Let's say I get a good paying job teaching weight training using only barbells because the company I work for makes and sells them. I learn about a better way to do things using pullies and bands. Do I tell those I train about this, of course not.
I think we see a lot of that with this evoultion bull . Scientists who know they'd better not rock the boat on this, so they don't.
There is simply way too much out there talking about the....bogus...theory of evolution to not see what is really going on.
spurraider I know you hate to think you spent all that time learning about a load of bull , but ya did....bummer.
you can post example after example, it really doesn't matter. its the equivalent of you showing me several examples of successful Hail Mary touchdowns! the Doug Flutie play. the russell wilson play. link after link after link... right?
but it has been made clear that a VAST MAJORITY of scientists are on the other side of the coin, Avante. you can keep spamming google, but that isn't going to change it. a hail mary has a low success rate, and a small minority of scientists disagree with evolution
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)