Reply With Quote
why is it we can see so many examples of successful hail mary touchdowns?
do you think dinosaurs and humans coexisted?
why is it we can see so many examples of successful hail mary touchdowns?
yeah, but its not like every evolutionary biologist works for one umbrella company called "Science Inc" or something like that. scientists REGULARLY attack each other's claims. this is called "peer review." this means every time a scientist wants to publish his findings in an academic journal, thousands of other scientists working in completely different spheres dissect his study and try to find flaws in it before allowing it to be published.
lets say in your example, you learned a better way to do things using pullies and bands, but out of pressure, you don't tell those you train about it. but you have a dozen competing weight training studios scattered throughout the same city. if one of them discovers a better way to do it, you bet your ass they will advertise their "new, better technique" and try to attract clients that way.
basically every scientific breakthrough comes at the expense of somebody else's work. every time a new theory is accepted, that means the previous one is discarded or minimized. Newtonian gravity was replaced by Einsteinian gravity. although many of newtons principles carry over, newton's laws fail when you get too close to a supermassive object like the sun (which is why newtons laws failed at predicting mercury's orbits)... and newtons laws also fail when it comes to small masses, like within an atom.
do you think dinosaurs coexisted with humans?
So you know more about this than all those I showed you....right? So all those professors/scfientists are wrong and you know more about it......right?
Your football thing is too stupid to even bother with.
Why not actually watch that video, ok?
100% the truth and only a fool wouldn't see it.
its not that "i" know better... its that a VAST majority of scientists will disagree with the one's you've handpicked. even if you give me a list of 1,000 scientists, you can rest assured that a MUCH larger number of scientists are going to be pro-evolution.
this is why i keep using the football analogy. every time you are bringing up a scientist that disagrees, it is like bringing up an example of a successful hail mary. there are probably thousands of successful hail marys in the history of football, if you add up the ones in pro, college, high school.
imagine a started a thread and had a video of EVERY singe one of those. 40+ pages of successful hail mary touchdowns. would that mean that the hail mary is a high%, successful play? no.
you can keep giving example after example of scientists, but it isn't even debatable that evolution is accepted by a vast, vast majority of all scientists
Why not watch the one I posted, ok?
i did. it doesn't really make a good point.
a) it attacks artist illustrations.
whoop-dee-doo. i dont care for artist illustrations either. but the fossils are there and you can see them in museums.
b) it attacked a handful of mistakes that were made, like the java man.
this is a tired argument that robdiaz always pushes forward too. what's funny is, it is in fact the same scientific community that you like to mock, that discovered the errors and made the corrections. this is part of that whole peer review thing i talked about. some scientists made a mistake, and the scientific consensus determined that it was a mistake, and corrected it. the theory still stands, however, due to the overwhelming evidence
Are you that much in denial?
And those drawings are used in the school text books.a) it attacks artist illustrations.
If it was a drawing that was in the bible or something a creationist posted you would be all over it.
And that is why your not worth the time debating withwhoop-dee-doo. i dont care
What fossils? Are you saying you can show proof man evolved from an ape?but the fossils are there and you can see them in museums.
Show is all the fossils you speak of.
So how many mistakes do you get?b) it attacked a handful of mistakes that were made, like the java man.
Java man is a perfect example how Science will bull the public every chance they get and you support that bull .
I get it your side lies it's whoop -dee-doo no biggie .
You and your Darwin supporters lost this debate years ago with the discovery of DNA and if you continue to support Evolution your going to look foolish and regret debating it.
Nothis is a tired argument
Last edited by mouse; 11-20-2014 at 02:42 AM.
do you think humans and dinosaurs coexisted?
I will answer your questions as soon as you answer this one, which i've been asking all day. It only requires a yes or no.
I am not 100% sure I'am still doing research on it, but I give it a 60% chance what I find will convince many I debate with online,FB.MIT, and ST ob course I'm talking (real people who are out to broaden they're minds.... not win some sort of a smack off)
There is too many cave drawings, pottery, and statues of dinosaurs all around the globe for these people to just create in there minds what a dinosaur looks like and get it just right is like 1,000 to 000.01 you would have a better chance to win a live debate with DR. Hovind then to some how not only know how the dinosaur looked just by looking at bone but to get the colors right?
Dude if your going to get high pass the pipe over here esse. You should have bailed after page one.
Are you related to pee wee Herman what's with the for tat style of debating are you using?I will answer your questions as soon as you answer this one,
You forgot about "Maybe" look not everyone drinks coke or Pepsi some of us drink DR.Pepper.which i've been asking all day. It only requires a yes or no.
You see that's your problem your young, and you want answers now but your not willing to learn anymore your not willing to open door number 3
thinks The Flintstones were based on a true story
You went for the bait......
you've posted this probably a dozen times in this thread alone
a) Pasteur's findings do nothing to refute Darwin
b) The Urey-Miller Experiment: it originally yielded organic compounds and amino acids. in the 90's they realized the gases used in the experiment were not consistent with the early-world atmosphere, as Miller himself admitted. so they REDID the experiment with the correct gases and came up with even MORE diverse molecules.
read up, dude
Way too much stuff out there disputing/criticizing the theory of evolution and as the years go by it's getting worst. The internet is choked full of articals/videos all saying pretty much the same thing......the theory of evolution is a crook of crap.
To put a lot into some....theory...with it's origins how long ago....nay! We have moved on past that and it's obvious.
Sorry, you're just wrong.
How does it feel to be so wrong and so fat at the same time?
Way too much stuff out there proving that the Hail Mary is a perfect play. The internet is choked full of videos all showing pretty much the same thing...... the hail mary is the most effective football play ever
So you are saying that no there aren't a ton of videos/articles talking about how the theory of evolution is bogus......right?
So how many more are there saying the theory of evolution is not bogus?
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmm?
There are a ton of videos showing that the hail mary works and is effective.
do you know what the phrase "vast majority" means?
Don't the "vast majority" believe in a God?
Dude, the Hail Mary thing is beyond stupid, ok?
You're in the minority little guy.
LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - A Gallup poll from May, 2014, has some insights into what Americans believe about human origins. The vast majority of Americans believe that God was involved in creation, either by guiding human evolution or by creating humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years.
Only a distinct minority, about 19 percent, believe that God had no role in human creation, essentially an atheistic view.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
