Reply With Quote
the evidence overwhelmingly supports evolution. that is why it is irrational to claim otherwise
Dude, who is reading a ton of articles and watching a ton of videos on this? Close minded?????? You're the one who is closeed minded not me. What, there is no way in you could be wrong about this? When it's real obvious a lot of others think you are.
the evidence overwhelmingly supports evolution. that is why it is irrational to claim otherwise
i have never resorted to "but i was taught" as an argument. don't put words in my mouth.
these videos are not very intelligent at all. i can go through them one by one and explain how flawed they are. like your hysterical peanut butter video. i had a good laugh at that one. all of the stuff you posted either relies on bad science or flat out misunderstanding of science
You must have missed the part about him publishing his findings in a mul ude of different scientific journals. That were distributed to the scientific world.
You don't find it rasther strange that so many people simply don't buy what you arte trying to peddle? Why do you think that is? You do know there is a HUGE amount of info out there totally kicking the out of what you are foolish enought to believe right?
So what credentials do you have?
No it doesn't and that's where you keep making your big mistake. You were mislead and too dumb to see it.
yeah and his work got discredited. and yet in this video he falsely claims victory, saying things like "nobody has proven his findings wrong."
Gentry has had strong disagreements with other creationists over some details of flood geology.[3] A number of creationists, including fellow Seventh-day Adventists, have criticised his work.[1]
In the late 1970s, Gentry challenged the scientific community to synthesize "a hand-sized specimen of a typical bio e-bearing granite" as a test of his claims. The scientific response was dismissive, with geologist G. Brent Dalrymple stating:[1] "As far as I am concerned, Gentry's challenge is silly. … He has proposed an absurd and inconclusive experiment to test a perfectly ridiculous and unscientific hypothesis that ignores virtually the entire body of geological knowledge."
In 1981 Gentry was a defense witness in the McLean v. Arkansas case over the cons utional validity of Act 590 that mandated that "creation science" be given equal time in public schools with evolution.[4] The defense lost and Act 590 was ruled to be uncons utional (a verdict that was influential on, and upheld by, theSupreme Court in Edwards v. Aguillard).
Gentry has devised his own creationist cosmology and filed a lawsuit in 2001 against Los Alamos National Laboratory and Cornell University after personnel deleted ten of his papers about his cosmology from the public preprint server arXiv.[5] On 23 March 2004, Gentry's lawsuit against arXiv was dismissed by a Tennessee court on the grounds that it lackedterritorial jurisdiction, as neither defendant in the case was considered to have a significant presence in the state of Tennessee.[6]
His self-published book Creation's Tiny Mystery was reviewed by geologist Gregg Wilkerson, who said that it has several logical flaws and concluded that "the book is a source of much misinformation about current geologic thinking and confuses fact with interpretation." He also noted that the book contains considerable autobiographical material and he observed that "[i]n general I don't think educators will find its worth their time to tread through this creationist's whining."[7] This criticism of Gentry's "frequent whining about discrimination" has also been made by fellow creationists, who concluded that "his scientific snubs resulted more from his own abrasive style than from his peculiar ideas", according to Ronald L. Numbers, a prominent historian of science.
i have a bachelors degree in biochemistry from ucla
first of all.alex jones
second of all, some random geneticist came up with a radical theory of the chimp and a pig. and guess what? the scientific community doesn't buy it. his work is mocked. the chimp-pig thing is not at all accepted by the scientific community. so you find some nutjob scientist (like the scientist in the video you posted earlier) who's work is NOT accepted by the scientific community, and you think that is proof that evolution isn't real? that makes no sense at all
So you work in biochemistry....right?
nope, i'm currently a law student
Don't you get tired of discrediting everyone who doesn't agree with you and as we seeing that is a truck load. Everyone doesn't know anything, they have an agenda, they don't understand this or that or.......dude, is there ever going to come a point where you realize you are simply wrong?first of all.
second of all, some random geneticist came up with a radical theory of the chimp and a pig. and guess what? the scientific community doesn't buy it. his work is mocked. the chimp-pig thing is not at all accepted by the scientific community. so you find some nutjob scientist (like the scientist in the video you posted earlier) who's work is NOT accepted by the scientific community, and you think that is proof that evolution isn't real? that makes no sense at all
So you have no problem discrediting those who obviously know far more about this than yourself....right?
Avante, stop dawdling and take the IQ Test. You have no excuses left. If you still refuse to take it until now, then you will be admitting once and for all that you are incredibly stupid, full of hot air, and lack the for ude to prove your worth.
http://iqtest.com/
its not me discrediting them. some random scientist thought the earth was young because he used a phony dating method which has been refuted by scientists.
similarly, another nutjob theorized that a chimp and a pig mated and led to humans. his work has also been refuted and discredited.
when they make outrageous claims like the guy in your peanut butter video, no, i have no problem discrediting them.
besides, based on their explanations on what they think evolution is, its clear they dont know far more about this than myself.
Do I really need to take you to sites talking about all those theories science was totally wrong about?
i already know about all of them. every scientific theory replaces an old one. science corrects itself over time. its not stubborn
newtons "laws" of gravity fail quite often
Well I;ve read/heard them and read you and it's real obvious to me who doesn't really get it, that would be you.
how are you in a position to make that judgment? what is your education history? sunday school? weekly mass?
you really think that nutjob from the peanut butter video has a good grasp on evolution?
You look pretty stupid to me asshole, so what good did that test do you?
its clear that other animals lived on the earth long before humans ever did.
the oldest known human civilization was formed about 6,000 years ago. but we know humans as a species existed for thousands and thousands of years before that. not sure how else you can reconcile that
oh look, you get really defensive when you are asked to prove your ap ude. how unpredictable
I was raised in a home where everyone believed in God, so early on I was forced to tag along to church. My wife and her family are Christians. So it's always been around me.
As far as my formal education goes 33 college units and an avid reader with a wide varieties of interests.
You appear very limited my man, not able to see very far. Too....I wasn't taught that so it can't be. I;m not impressed at all with ya guy, yep, too simple.
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Posting Permissions