Michael Brown shot dead by police

[vy65]

why do you think that the prosecutor did that, couselor crayola?

Because monkeys like you want blood and some kabuki theater to allay their white guilt

[vy65]

If you want to make a comment about the prosecutors role in GJ proceeding then have at it. You cannot do it so you rely on the incredulity argument, counselor crayola. but hey at least you have moved on from the job thing and surrender that.

Crofl

I've been making a comment about the prosecutor's role at the jury the entire time. That's why I've asked you if he did anything that specifically failed to properly perform that role. You're failure to answer that question has been painfully on display.

You cannot articulate a damn thing and it's hilarious. Do you really have a law degree? I don't care how many trials you've been involved in. You are god awful at making arguments. What was it you said you used? legal zoom?

The only thing that's not been articulated is how specifically McCullough didn't do his job.

It's bee well do ented the cases that the prosecutors office has been losing because Wilson hasn't shown up to testify for them. If you don't think that the prosecutor doesn't have an authoritative role in that environment then you are an idiot.

This is barely English. What are you saying? That Wilson didn't testify?

[spurraider21]

i'm taking crim pro next semester.

i'll address all this then when i'm an expert

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Because monkeys like you want blood and some kabuki theater to allay their white guilt

nice characterization, holmes. and thanks for demonstrating his motive for not wanting to get an indictment.

counselor crayola just undermined his own arguments like a dumb . Bravo!

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Crofl

I've been making a comment about the prosecutor's role at the jury the entire time. That's why I've asked you if he did anything that specifically failed to properly perform that role. You're failure to answer that question has been painfully on display.



The only thing that's not been articulated is how specifically McCullough didn't do his job.



This is barely English. What are you saying? That Wilson didn't testify?

I told you I have not commented on his 'role.' It is obvious that you are too stupid to understand the improt of that so I guess we will just have to agree to disagree.

I just explained the working relationship between Wilson and the prosecutor and how it has been breaking down because Wilson hasn't showed up to testify for other trials. You don't deny that the prosecutor has the authority in that setting. You seem too dumb to figure out that bee was a typo for been I guess.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

All this still applies

You didn't ask me to explain myself. You asked me about his 'job' which I never commented on.

I can certainly quote the litany of articles talking about GJ indictment rates.

Do you need further explanation on how assigning a prosecutor who worked with and used police officers is a conflict of interest?

No, you want to ask non-pertinent questions. You don't get to frame my conversation either, bag. Not this way and you don't have the skills eleswise but keep trying; it is amusing, counselor crayola.

[vy65]

I told you I have not commented on his 'role.'

Yah, you did.

The prosecutor wasn't trying to get an indictment.

I just explained the working relationship between Wilson and the prosecutor and how it has been breaking down because Wilson hasn't showed up to testify for other trials. You don't deny that the prosecutor has the authority in that setting. You seem too dumb to figure out that bee was a typo for been I guess.

No you didn't. You wrongly said McCullough is Wilson's boss. That's not true.

What other grand jury proceedings did Wilson not show up for?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Yah, you did.





No you didn't. You wrongly said McCullough is Wilson's boss. That's not true.

What other grand jury proceedings did Wilson not show up for?

You quoted me before and I said he didn't try to get an indictment. Job, role, or whatever synonym you want to put in there is not in my statement. You keep trying to make it that way but all you can do is an assertion and get mad about it. It has been hilarious though so thank you for that.

I just gave you the working relationship where Wilson is subordinate to the prosecutor. You can handwave all you want about his chain of command in the department but that relationship exists between those two men.

[vy65]

This has gotten beyond re ed. I'm done until you answer this question.

You didn't ask me to explain myself. You asked me about his 'job' which I never commented on.

The prosecutor wasn't trying to get an indictment.

The prosecutor's job is to get an indictment.

Again, what specifically did or didn't the prosecutor do that makes you think he wasn't doing his job?

[vy65]

You quoted me before and I said he didn't try to get an indictment. Job, role, or whatever synonym you want to put in there is not in my statement. You keep trying to make it that way but all you can do is an assertion and get mad about it. It has been hilarious though so thank you for that.

I just gave you the working relationship where Wilson is subordinate to the prosecutor. You can handwave all you want about his chain of command in the department but that relationship exists between those two men.

He's not a subordinate. What about this are you not getting?

[FuzzyLumpkins]

This has gotten beyond re ed. I'm done until you answer this question.





The prosecutor's job is to get an indictment.

Prove it. It will be amusing watching you come up with the St Louis Prosecutor's directives regarding grand jury proceedings.

Frankly I think that saying that it is a prosecutor's job is to try to get an indictment for every case presented is prima facia stupid.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

He's not a subordinate. What about this are you not getting?

I maintain that the working relationship where Wilson provided testimony for the prosecutor in support of their cases presents a conflict of interest when it pertains to the prosecutor prosecuting Wilson.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

This has gotten beyond re ed. I'm done until you answer this question.

You were to butthurt to go more than 1 minute without another post.

He's not a subordinate. What about this are you not getting?

[Trill Clinton]

[Venti Quattro]

College: UCLA

Nevermind

you cunt

[spurraider21]

http://m.stlamerican.com/news/local_....html?mode=jqm

[Trill Clinton]

[Trill Clinton]

more riot porn

[spurraider21]

how happy did it make you when you found a couple of pictures of white guys in the riots?

[Trill Clinton]

how happy did it make you when you found a couple of pictures of white guys in the riots?

not near as happy as the ST white supremacists were last night. uhhh whites riot damn near every year...its nothing new.

[Trill Clinton]

i think my favorite riote to date has to be the pumpkin festival lol

[FuzzyLumpkins]

http://m.stlamerican.com/news/local_....html?mode=jqm

That article does a good job pointing out how monolithic the law enforcement apparatus is.

[Trill Clinton]

police are still looking for 3 thugs from the pumpkin riots. if you recognize these faces, contact authorities

http://boston.cbslocal.com/2014/11/2...pkin-festival/

[spurraider21]

That article does a good job pointing out how monolithic the law enforcement apparatus is.

it also shuts up the false story roaming around with how the prosecutor ran a fundraiser for wilson

[spurraider21]

not near as happy as the ST white supremacists were last night. uhhh whites riot damn near every year...its nothing new.

i'd say each picture makes you equally happy. needless to say you haven't found nearly as much happiness as the others