Mind you guys, he pulled this from a blog whose banner is:
http://theconservativetreehouse.com/...cted-visually/
I don't find it credible.I know that your chart was taking information outside of the GJ testimonies as they talk about radio and TV broadcasts repeatedly. You didn't even read your own chart or check what the source was.
critical thinking
I must say making the new thread using the exact phrase you're butthurt about for the le is MONU INGMENTAL.
You admit to not reading the witness transcripts yet somehow are able to not find it credible.
You are such a stupid .
Again, your chart does not even meet your own standard. You can call me stupid all you like but you miss the forest for trees. Looking at the comments by your Breitbart piece it just screams about the obvious lack of real cross examination as they try to perform cross on their own. You don't seem to understand the point of pursuing truth and what I am saying about the prosecutors conflict of interest.You admit to not reading the witness transcripts yet somehow are able to not find it credible.
You are such a stupid .
I'm sure you will find all manner of attorney types to argue on the behalf of Wilson. One was running the GJ too. But go google some more and have fun, I'm going to watch the game.
It's weird that this is so important to you.You admit to not reading the witness transcripts yet somehow are able to not find it credible.
You are such a stupid .
I noticed inconsistencies in your chart having actually read the witness statements, something you've yet to do. And it's not my chart. I simply found it in the comments section when looking at the link to your chart. You've yet to read the witness statements yet are somehow able to claim one is valid and one is not. Try again.
I enjoy watching Fuzzy flail around.
I get that, but I probably would've picked a different battle.
I.ve determined that it is pointless to get involved in any kind of discourse with you. It would not benefit me in the least.
That's some weak question-dodging, tbh. Even for you.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't you involved in a "battle" with Avante?
And lol at "battle". We are on a sports message board, do you take things that seriously here?
Alright Fuzzy Cowboys won. Did you have time to read the witness statements yet?
I meant battle figuratively. Not a literal battle.
And no, I was never in a battle with Avante.
Even for me? I'm not dodging your question. I know where you stand on the issue. I do not anticipate an intelligent discussion/debate with you. I'm not interested.That's some weak question-dodging, tbh. Even for you.
god damn dude we get it, you dont wanna look at the issue any deeper. just move the on and keep thinking all that protesting was over michael brown and not the fact that that entire community was a racial powderkeg waiting to blow.
You posted the chart and allowed it to speak for you in place of demonstrating the 'inconsistencies in (my) chart.' It's your chart but it's entertaining to watch you distance yourself from it.
You are too dumb to make the argument on your own? You claim to have read the chart. Make your own argument. I don't think you can do it; as I have said you are not particularly bright.
Until you address the conflict of interest my position subsumes what you are trying to claim but by all means flail around.
Lol OP is a got
No, it was about Brown at first. Then once people realized how much the media was lying, people started conveniently moving the goalposts to a more vague open-ended racial/police brutality issue to save face.
There is a deeper issue with blacks being targeted by police but this wasn't the one to rally around you stupid . Black guy robs store, black guy assaults store owner, black guy assaults cop, black guy goes for cops firearm, black charges cop, black guy dies. Yeah let's burn our town down that will show them!
This isn't about my chart your chart. the second chart i found when reading the pbs charts comment section was an easy laugh at your chart.
I'm sitting here laughing at you for trying to argue either chart considering you've admitted to having not read any of the witness statements that were provided. You're treading into WC territory tonight.
Please tell, what is a battle worth fighting figuratively on the Internet that you are proud to have been involved in
What a pussy ugh
how about cop beats man half to death, then charges the man with "destroying police property" for bleeding on his uniform, how does that sound you cop fellating got?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
