Reply With Quote
She's a cunt
This video contains everything the left despises:
White men
Southerners
Praying
Heterosexual married couples
Unaborted kids
American flags
Gas-guzzling pickups and SUV's
Military
She's a cunt
Yeah her links to the bankers and her and her husband's work in deregulating that industry make me unable to support her prima facia.
her neo-con-hood and Wall St loving her are huge black marks.
Not a fan, but at this minute, it's her presidency to lose, IMO.
i thought that was a truck commercial
The only good thing about her being president would be that teabagger legislation would get vetoed. Of course if the Democrats got congress in 2016 and have her tired ass there to sign all their crap that would be ty too.
Think so?
crap like what? funding govt? raising the national min wage?
still gotta see who the GOP fields, but outside of Christie, I don't think the rest of the field (Paul, Cruz, Santorum, Bachman, Rubio, Walker) really have a shot...
Christie doesn't have a chance vs any Dem.
morbid obesity doesn't "look" presidential, although seriously overweight/obese voters, 2/3 of the country, might identify with him.
Christie's doomed. He had that brief lapse in political miopia where he palled around with Obama after Hurricane Sandy.
Christie certainly has his own skeletons in the closet, but out of that group, he's the only guy I see that can appeal to the center with any credibility...
No, crap like O'Niggercare.
Christie is a fat and Americans won't elect disgusting pieces of like that who look bad on camera. Jeb Bush might be their best bet tbh, but his head brother's name might kill him instead of his dad's good name helping him.
Yeah, Taft would never be elected in the TV age.
I don't disagree, that's why I said, right now, this is Hillary's election to lose.
whoever said Hillary lacks that new car smell was spot on. it's hard to imagine a more power hungry with penis envy than her (cue mom jokes). I don't think this country can tolerate another ty president, 2 in a row has been bad, but the Oligarchs will foist Jeb or Hillary on us and the media will comply, so I'm prepared for the worst.
I just don't see it. If Clinton couldn't get Gore elected, I don't think Hillary will be in as good of a spot. The media will cover for her per par, but she's too divisive imo. We'll see though.
anyone you like? Obama for a third term with posse comitatus? Elizabeth Warren? bernie saunders?
Nope. Bad time to be in the center, tbh... GOP keeps tilting further to the right, the consensus "left" candidate is a well known neocon... I don't even think of any other Democrat matters, they don't have a shot against Hillary, IMO.
Slomo, get in here.
Last edited by Uriel; 12-06-2014 at 03:23 AM.
Indeed, that is disappointing. But to be fair, no Democratic candidate prior to Clinton had much appeal to the broader masses because they were too far to the left. It was only by shifting slightly to the right and becoming more moderate that they could hope to win an election, and deregulating the financial industry cons uted a step in that direction.
Besides, they were swept up in the economic orthodoxy that pervaded the time. Friedrich Hayek's philosophy of freeing the market was on the ascendancy, in large part due to the work of Milton Friedman (and the politicians who followed him like Raegan and Thatcher). So at the time, what they were doing seemed like a good idea. It's only hindsight with the GFC that economists can claim that the financial industry boom in the immediate aftermath of the deregulation was unsustainable, and that the bubble would eventually burst.
Misogyny is misogyny is misogyny.
shut up. misogyny is the hatred of women. calling hillary clinton a name isn't a hatred of women. thats like saying calling obama an asshole makes me racist
either way, how old are you? running to find a mod because you didn't like what you read? grow a proverbial pair...
No, but calling Obama the n-word is racist. That's the more appropriate equivalent in Hilary's situation. Asshole is an all-ecompassing term that can be levied at anybody. What baseline_bum said on the other hand, is gender-specific. Case in point: when I tried to type it up, SpursTalk immediately censored the word, the way it does with the n-word.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
