Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765

  2. #2
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765

  3. #3
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Obama has to veto NDAA with riders like this BigCorp .

  4. #4

  5. #5
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    did you find any good reasons for giving away public land to a foreign company @ the link, if it is in fact true that the lands in question are "sacred," but not strictly speaking tribally held?

  6. #6
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    did you find any good reasons for giving away public land to a foreign company @ the link, if it is in fact true that the lands in question are "sacred," but not strictly speaking tribally held?
    I'm just adding to the information.

    I am not OK with this unless it is the decision of the Indians, then it should also be their deal to negotiate.

  7. #7
    dangerous floater Winehole23's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Post Count
    113,765
    Under a section en led “Read the Bill” in the Pledge to America that Republicans penned up in 2010, the GOP promised:


    We will ensure that bills are debated and discussed in the public square by publishing the text online for at least three days before coming up for a vote in the House of Representatives. No more hiding legislative language from the minority party, opponents, and the public. Legislation should be understood by all interested parties before it is voted on.

    Nevertheless, the 1,648-page NDAA was voted on in the the GOP-majority House on Dec. 4, less than two days after the final text of the bill was posted online on Dec. 2 at 10:32 pm. The NDAA passed the House by a largely bipartisan vote of 300 to 119.
    There were 32 Republicans who voted against the bill. Meanwhile, there were 194 Republicans who voted in favor of passing the NDAA. The Republican-controlled House required the help of 106 Democrats to pass the defense authorization act.



    In the pledge, under a section led, “Advance Legislative Issues One at a Time,” Republicans promised to “end the practice of packaging unpopular bills with ‘must-pass’ legislation to cir vent the will of the American people. Instead, we will advance major legislation one issue at a time.”



    Yet, an unrelated public lands package that Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) called a “disservice to members of the Armed Forces” was attached to the NDAA, which is considered “must-pass” legislation.
    According to Sen. Cruz, the “extreme land grab” provisions in the NDAA, include: “250,000 acres of new wilderness designations” and a “study to begin the National Women’s History Museum.”
    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2...dge-to-America

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •