Reply With Quote
As someone who lives near Oakland and watches their games, no. Especially not in terms of rebounding. And having him off the bench, where he'll play the rest of the way, will be a good thing for them.
As someone who lives near Oakland and watches their games, no. Especially not in terms of rebounding. And having him off the bench, where he'll play the rest of the way, will be a good thing for them.
I didn't even watch the game, been way too busy. sounds like Manu was garbage. I think ElAgente was chatting with Manu earlier on AIM, knew he was preparing a sandwich for tonight and tried to tag my name along with it.
Sounds like a classic Nono move tbh.
I didn't even watch the game, been way too busy. sounds like Manu was garbage. I think ElAgente was chatting with Manu earlier on AIM, knew he was preparing a sandwich for tonight and tried to tag my name along with it.
Scro, we're gonna murder both teams tbh.
I didn't even watch the game, been way too busy. sounds like Manu was garbage. I think ElAgente was chatting with Manu earlier on AIM, knew he was preparing a sandwich for tonight and tried to tag my name along with it.the original thread le was "Hi-Fi", but you never showed up to start the game thread, so I had to do it for you, tbh...
If the Spurs can't beat Melo isos, then we have a big problem.
Spurs were playing the "turn on the switch" card tonight. Even Pop's ejection couldn't turn it on. Next, please.
That is what you think!
His return is probably going to slow them down. As much as people criticize him, he's obviously better than a fringe rotation player, but it'll be difficult to make him more than that without changing the dynamic of the team. Him and Speights together would also make an awful defensive combination.
Either way, the Spurs and Thunder both have a level the Warriors can't reach. I must say though, they do seem legitimately better than the Clippers, which I wasn't expecting.
thanks for the reminder but i've been out of it. didn't start lurking til the game was underway. you can start the next one unless you worry about jinxing The Client.
I haven't read any other posts yet, but I hope no one having a meltdown over this. This game in no way resembles anything that matters. There is simply no doubt the spurs are better than the jazz. They just had a bad shooting night without their starting point guard. Meaningless game.
People are just mad because the Spurs threw away an easy game and played as ty as they did in Brooklyn. The loss is meaningless but it may hurt later in the seedings.
I havent read any other posts yet, but I hope no one having a meltdown over this. This game in no way resembles anything that matters. There is simply no doubt the spurs are better than the jazz. They just had a bad shooting night without their starting point guard. Meaningless game.
Not that much so being we sent him out to retirement a loser in the playoffs and he retired. You know though it would not shock me if they won in SA tomorrow, would suck but Fisher seems to have some kind of mystique at times when he enters that damn building.
Well obviously there is no question they are alot better than the Jazz, nobody said otherwise. Which is why a loss like this is one of those joke earlier in the year losses that the Spurs routinely get until they can find their groove.^^^^^ This.
I haven't read any other posts yet, but I hope no one having a meltdown over this. This game in no way resembles anything that matters. There is simply no doubt the spurs are better than the jazz. They just had a bad shooting night without their starting point guard. Meaningless game.
Good thing we get a literal punching bag in the
Losing against bad teams this year will not gonna cut it standing wise in the WC
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions