Reply With Quote
so black who es about white (male) privilege should not achieve a white (mile) lifestyle?
the only good n!gg@ is a poor n!gg@, right?
Black Crime Claims Life of Apologist for Black Crime
Ruenzel was writing about white privilege for the Southern Poverty Law Center as far back as 1997 — long before it became the rage at college campuses, newsrooms, churches, high schools and even grade schools.
By the time of his death, Ruenzel had ac ulated many of the trappings of the white privilege he exposed: The job. The home. The intact family. And most importantly in his case, white privilege endowed Ruenzel with an expectation of safety in the Oakland neighborhood where last week two black people are suspected of killing him.
so black who es about white (male) privilege should not achieve a white (mile) lifestyle?
the only good n!gg@ is a poor n!gg@, right?
You're not making any sense, as usual.
ah, ok, DR was white, so he's being trashed by white supremacist conservative racist "American Thinker" for writing about white male privilege and for SPLC?
so it's white librulls who ENABLE and defend black violence? really? All white libruls? most? a few? any?
otoh, white conservatives, Fox defend, enable, promote Bundy, who LIED about his family's property owndership, and Bundy's violent, gun-totin, ready-to-shoot, aimed-at-govt-officials, self-annointed Defenders Of The Cons ution. Many Repugs and conservatives are ing wondering if The Republic can exist for 2 more years under that Obama n!gg@, talking about violence, uprising, etc.
I think you misunderstand the article.
It was an article about the irony of a white man, living in a black neighborhood, writing about how white privilege is the cause of black crime, thinking that insulated him from the black crime caused by white privilege, but failing to recognize he, too, was living a life of white privilege, and, finally, in the end, suffering the fate he ascribes to the white privilege he eschewed in his writings.
I'm still not sure what you're talking about but, I wanted to make clear my understanding of the article I posted. Dr. Ruenzel's fate was ironic.
Classy post and article.
Not sure why an article dancing on the grave of a writer who supposedly defended black crime and claimed to be safe from it because of his whiteness includes not a single quote from that writer.
But the "American Thinker" website is clearly not for an intellectually curious audience.
Yoni is really happy about this.
Sounds like he did a lot of work for the Southern Poverty Law Center; perhaps an interested person would check it out.
I'm not interested.
Nope. Just recognizing the irony.
Your thread. Why should we be interested about any of it then?
Neither you nor the author has shown any irony here. All you've done so far is offer smug commentary on a man's death.
It's a terribly written article with zero quotes from the victim himself illustrated what they are saying about him.
Yoni never heard of this guy before today's email and all I know about him is that white people are happy black guys killed him so they can post about his murder on message boards.
I guess that's a question you'll have to ask yourself being as you're in here engaging it.
You aren't even interested in the subject of your post anymore.
That's interesting in itself.
I offered no commentary beyond claiming his death was ironic, which I still maintain.
You know, kind of like the irony of driving an electric car is dirtier than driving a gasoline-powered car, in an area where it is recharged using coal-powered generators.
According to the article that shows not one example of his work.
Have you read any of his work, yoni?
Did you know this person existed before you got this story, yoni?
Im real happy about it and I cant wait till something like this happens to jewtons or any of the other nˇgger loving lib s on this site. The guy was a gay jew and it happened at a park thats a known meet up site for gay men to have public sex. Which once again proves my theory that all liberal males love nˇgger in their ass or nˇgger in their wives pussy that they can clean up.
You're the one wondering why you're interested.
No I asked you why we should be interested when you only wanted to crow about this guy's murder.
...based on no evidence that it was ironic beyond the claims made in an article clearly written for dumb people.
So, you're suggesting the guy wasn't associated with the Southern Poverty Law Center, that he didn't write about black violence being caused by white privilege and that he didn't suffer a fate he justified through his warped sense that white privileged people somehow cause blacks to be violent?
Because THAT's ironic.
You don't have to be interested.
No one said anyone had to be anything. You were asked why we should be interested.
I don't care if you are, I don't even pretend to believe you should. There are hundreds of other posters in the forum that have demonstrated their disinterest by not posting in the thread. Might I suggest you do the same if you are unable to figure out whether or not you're interested?
I'm saying I don't know what he wrote because this article didn't quote him... instead quoting other writers they claim had the same views. Why wouldn't they just quote the subject of the story? There's a very big gap between identifying white privilege as a root cause of black violence vs. outright justifying it. If he actually said that violence is justified, I'm sure that quote is available somewhere.
It's as though they believe their audience will just accept (and in some instances share) whatever is spoon fed to them without having the intellectual curiosity to validate what they're reading.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
