Except that it wasn't unthinkable and that Kawhi was not glued to the bench before the trade.
Except that it wasn't unthinkable and that Kawhi was not glued to the bench before the trade.
Splitter probably had been in their plans longer (can't believe he's almost 30) but couldn't pry him away from Europe yet. Still pretty amazing, not to mention finding two other productive rotation guys for the league minimum in Neal and Blair, no matter what their faults were.
Ok. Are you trying to be literal in saying it was "unthinkable" or are you really trying to imply it was likely the Spurs would be able to move that contract/find a taker for RJ?
Also, IIRC, while RJ was with the team, I believe he started every single game and played close to 30MPG. I believe Kawhi was hovering around 20MPG until the trade..
You make it sound like getting rid of RJ was a long shot.
They were ready to amnesty RJ before Kawhi's rookie season, but couldn't sign a reasonable alternative for the MLE.
Kawhi was not glued to the bench with RJ on the team. He was in the rotation from the first game of his rookie season. With Kawhi proving himself to be ready for the NBA, RJ would not have been back for the 2012-13 season, either through trade or amnesty. As it was, the opportunity to him offload him earlier presented itself and the Spurs jumped on it, but your contention that Kawhi was glued to the bench just doesn't stand up to a fact check.
RJ was the starter, but you're wrong about Kawhi's minutes.
Let's keep this clean. No bellow the belt. No 3 knockdown rule. Bell can't save you.
How many minutes was Kawhi playing per game pre-RJ trade.
Getting rid of RJ was absolutely an long-shot. Spurs had not shown the willingness to amnesty anyone for any reason and were the only team not to use their amnesty, no? RJ's contract was terrible and just because one stupid team made a stupid trade, doesn't mean it was at all likely. When that contract was signed, the vast majority of people here and pundits knew it was a VERY difficult contract to move.
40 games pre-trade: 23.4 mpg
24 games post-trade: 25.0 mpg
Jack basically took RJ minutes while Kawhi permanently moved in the starting line-up, but Kawhi was part of a 4-man wing rotation from Game 1.
Well, that is more minutes than I remembered. I thought he was closer to 20MPG pre-trade. Despite that, I contended that RJ would be the starter and play big minutes which would limit the impact of the trade. Many argued that RJ wouldn't play and he started 41 of 41 games and played close the team lead in minutes. But yes, Kawhi playing 23MPG isn't glued to the bench.
Your opinion. The amnesty reports before the 2011-12 were quite believable, imo.
One other thing. RJ's minutes were declining before the trade.
22 games in Dec/Jan: 31.0 mpg
19 games in Feb/Mar: 25.5 mpg
Jack came in and played 23.8 mpg.
Out of the 41 games while RJ was here, kawhi played in 40. And in those games he averaged over 23 mpg and about a half minute under his season average. I would hardly call that glued to the bench.
Did you hear we landed on the moon?
, tbh..
lefty coming hard with his vest and cellphone
lol got
To be fair, Leonard was a horrible shooter in college. No one knew he'd develop a jumper during the lockout.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)