Reply With Quote
when was the last time somebody was murdered and you knew about the person before the story? doesn't mean its wrong to have discussion about it
Just finding further proof that yoni learns what to think about such things exclusively from ty blogs like that one.
I had never heard of this guy before.
I doubt anyone here had.
when was the last time somebody was murdered and you knew about the person before the story? doesn't mean its wrong to have discussion about it
The contention that it is noteworthy per OP has yet to be borne out by any facts.
Did you know who Michael Brown was before he was shot?
We know why that was noteworthy. Still waiting for something that backs up your characterizations of the victim here.
Actually, no; I have no idea why the shooting of Michael Brown was noteworthy beyond his family, circle of friends, and the community of Ferguson, Missouri.
Because it touched on a broader idiotic aspect of liberal ideology - White Privilege and because of the irony.
Well that's your personal problem.
What is your proof of this?Because it touched on a broader idiotic aspect of liberal ideology - White Privilege and because of the irony.
Been asking you all day.
I don't view it as a problem.
Yeah, I'm waiting on a reply from American Thinker. They were pretty specific about when he started writing about the topic in 1997 so, I guessing they have a source that is not accessible via the internet. We'll see. If the article was wrong, I'll personally apologize to the family in this thread. I'm sure they're hanging on our every word.
Other than that, the idea of White Privilege being a catalyst for black violence is something the liberals love to harp about...
Student mugged, says he deserved it because of his 'privilege'
I can't help but believe Dr. Ruenzel would believe the same way if, in fact, what has been said about him is true.
Of course you don't.
That has nothing to do with my question about Ruenzel, but you can celebrate that guy's mugging here too while you wait for "American Thinker" to think for you:Yeah, I'm waiting on a reply from American Thinker. They were pretty specific about when he started writing about the topic in 1997 so, I guessing they have a source that is not accessible via the internet. We'll see. If the article was wrong, I'll personally apologize to the family in this thread. I'm sure they're hanging on our every word.
Other than that, the idea of White Privilege being a catalyst for black violence is something the liberals love to harp about...
Student mugged, says he deserved it because of his 'privilege'
I can't help but believe Dr. Ruenzel would believe the same way if, in fact, what has been said about him is true.
Well, then restate your question, I've obviously missed it in all your non-question questions.
And, as I said, it's a legitimate question that's been asked of American Thinker by more than me.
But, as I also said, since they were very specific, I am thinking they have a source not accessible to us on the internet. We'll see.
Finally, I said, if it turns out they can't produce any writings by Ruenzel, I'll apologize to the family in this thread.
See, you weren't paying attention. I'd already answered the question.
Was is the distinction between you and a blog?
Any do ent can be scanned and posted.But, as I also said, since they were very specific, I am thinking they have a source not accessible to us on the internet. We'll see.
Or just quoted and sourced.
So there is no proof backing your contention you regurgitated from your blog.
I was paying attention to that all along.
Why don't you just ever make a statement? Your question is obviously trying to elicit a particular response so, why don't you just skip the extra half-dozen nonsensical question posts and say what it is you want to say?
You're right. I think they need to pony up and, it's probably something I should have waited for before posting.
I couldn't see a difference, so I asked for one.
lol probablyYou're right. I think they need to pony up and, it's probably something I should have waited for before posting.
Well, to be fair, it's a lot better than the "Fake but accurate" excuse CBS clung to for so long in their hit piece on President Bush.
Hey, it's a mistake. I guess you don't make them. Must be nice.
One of the head s at the SPLC claims he wrote white privilege articles for them here http%3A%2F%2Fwww.splcenter.org%2Fblog%2F2014%2F12% 2F04%2Famerican-thinker-sinks-to-the-bottom-of-racist-barrel%2F
Which one is the white privilege article?
They weren't specific at all, which is the problem, and yet you've placed your trust in them despite the fact that they think you're a complete moron. Most people would be insulted by this. But not you.
This was posted in the Club already.
American Thinker Sinks to the Bottom of Racist Barrel
I guess, Heidi Beirich, the Intelligence Project Coordinator at SPLC would be as good as source as anyone...Ruenzel, an English teacher, wrote a few posts on white privilege and other topics for the Southern Poverty Law Center’s esteemed Teaching Tolerance project back in the late 1990s.
I already linked to those posts. There were three of them. The last one was in 1998. None of them mentions "white privilege." You've been duped.
Don't you read anything, yoni?
So, the SPLC's Heidi Beirich is mistaken? Lying? What? Perhaps they removed the articles about white privilege. I don't know but, an authoritative source from the SPLC says Ruenzel wrote articles for them about white privilege.
I'm uncertain why the Southern Poverty Law Center's "Intelligence Project Coordinator" would say Ruenzel wrote articles, for the SPLC, about white privilege if, in fact, he hadn't.
It's curious.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions