Last time you tried this you beat 'em flat.
GSW, the top team in the West at 23-3, goes into Staples and the Lakers choose not to play Kirby.
The Lakers are +22 per 100 possessions with Kirby off the court.
Is it a small sample size, or is Kirby really the cancer his numbers show him to be?
Show em up Swaggy P!
Last time you tried this you beat 'em flat.
Swaggy, Booz, Rin, all look to have nice chemistry on the court without cancer. Price is stealing, Rin is dealing... nice looking team tbh
Can you imagine Kobe ting bricks watching this game praying for the Warriors to get hot and blow these Lakers out.
I'll just bet they are.
Worked last time. You ran the in' table on 'em.
Big shots.
61% shooting is pretty impressive. Easy to achieve when The Empty Chucker is benched.
Except we did it in their house.
Kobe's going to be maaaaaaddddd if the Lakers win this game, tbh..
Kobe has to big of an ego to accept he is the reason his team loses.
Beat 'em flat.
Nah, he'll passively aggressively downplay it as meaningless, unlike his 3rd place scoring mark that has since cost them team any shred of dignity they've ever mustered.
Then went to LA 2.0 and did it again.
Amazing how much better the Lakers look without Kirby... Killakobe81 needs to explain this immediately, tbqmfh.
That's what "flat" means, dummy.
Lakers give up 118 per 100 possessions when Kirbs is on the court. When he's off the court, they're at 103 per 100. They're a solid team without Kirby
Easy:::now, NOW, now they want to play. Now. They're ready. Like the Rockets ready in the plane on the way to Portland ass over teacup 0-2. Same deal. Now.
Last time you ran the table on 'em.
Big shots. Gonna show the world.
No it doesn't. "Them" is your deflection in preparation for a win over the Warriors. You're trying to establish that a scrub team can beat the Warriors as if it's an anomaly that has a precedence to protect 60 cent, aka 8-30.
Led to 5.
Yes, it does. You beat 'em flat sans Kobe.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)