Reply With Quote
Average speed in the 2014 playoffs:
Patty Mills: 4.9 MPH
Tony Parker: 4.6 MPH
Oh my God
Average speed in the 2014 playoffs:
Patty Mills: 4.9 MPH
Tony Parker: 4.6 MPH
lol in law school and asking for legal advice on a speeding ticket
I find it strange that so many Spurs fans seemingly didn't watch last year's playoffs, tbh..
The Spurs were literally better when Parker was on the bench, statistically..he ranked 7th or 8th in the rotation in virtually every advanced metric, among Spurs rotation players..
He's just a luxury, at this point..people need to stop acting like this sample size is limited to this season, this decline began last year, it was evident to anybody that closely followed the Spurs..outside of the Portland series(where the Spurs still blew them out in game 5 without him) and game 7 vs. Dallas, he looked mediocre for the entire run..you knew it was bad when Pop was condescendingly complimenting him on his "leadership", just because he accepted to sit on the bench for key stretches
Logically speaking, he's a 32-year old PG with a ton of mileage, and has relied mostly on speed/quickness for effectiveness..he's not Duncan or Ginobili, tbh..
As a Spurs fan, I'm deathly afraid that Parker will sabotage the Spurs, like Derrick Rose is currently doing to the Bulls..ball-dominant PGs that are no longer good players can destroy your team..fortunately, Pop showed us last year that he won't hesitate to bench Parker when he's ineffective, so let's hope he sticks to that..
Man, I can't believe so many Spurs fans still refer to Parker's quickness and skills like it's 2012, tbh..
It's the equivalent of Harlem saying, "damn, Tim Duncan sure draws a lot of attention and double teams in the post, which opens things up for the rest of the team"..
We're in 2015, some of y'all s need to join the rest of us, tbh..
He's a slightly above average PG that no longer impacts the game on a significant level, which is quantified by the numbers, and has been since last year's playoffs..you can keep ting out the "penetration" narrative, but the numbers don't support your claims..
I can't stand these fans that don't see the roles that different players had on our team at different times during different situations in the playoffs. We play as a team and don't rely on any one player. Manu, Tim, Tony, KL, Danny, Tiago, Boris, Patty, they all have their moments and place as we are a team first.
Thats why we displayed some of the most beautiful basketball ever seen without any true allstar.
Yeah.
Uhhh....
How many miles did they both go?
Can you find that?
Oh my God...
Tickle, tickle...
Im glad I can entertain one of the worst posters on this entire site.
Please start another thread of intrigue and curiosity.
No.
Don't.
Harlem dominating GNSF in the post like prime Duncan ITT
lolutsa
RC had to know TP was basically done before they extended him. Makes me pessimistic about the plan for the next 3 years tbh, as contracts like Tony's are perfect for tanking teams that need to put butts in seats.
In the future, if Patty could assume the starting role and TP would accept the 6th man role I wouldn't be mad. A starting lineup of Patty, Danny, Kawhi, (Good PF), & Tiago with a second unit of TP, Beli, KA, Boris, Baynes would still be pretty potent.
I just don't want this team to have the wheels fall off this year and ing tank like next year...
Honest question got: Why don't you ever just say what you're trying to say? You're not being deep, intelligent, edgy, or anything. You kind of just seem like a that is too scared to share his opinion. You're not a moderator, this isn't a ing debate class, you should honestly just grow some balls.
Tony plays more minutes against starters and Patty against reserves. Can't compare apples and oranges.
And? Compared to the looming salary cap this coming offseason I'd say that's proportionally fair. He's injured. They didn't even give him the max.
one of the main reasons why we're losing so many close games this year is because we don't have tony clutcher at 100%. once he gets back into game shape we're gonna start rollin.
That bench would be pretty ty, and Patty as a starting PG without a playmaking SG that can defend (basically superstar-level) is just asking for trouble.
TP is 33yrs old, he is not a youngster plus he is fighting some injuries. he is probably gonna play 3 more years so he is at the end of his career - reality check guys.
And he is far from done. It all depends how healthy he is gonna be during the playoffs. That's the key. The guy is a main point in spurs system for sakes!
These are very good points. I think we are at the very end or have just passed the end of Tony's prime. And it is a bit unlikely to expect him to remain effective into his late 30's like Manu or, heck, semi-dominant into his late 30's like Duncan. Does lightning strike in terms of longevity a third time? Probably not. That said, it could. Tony is already changing his game.
There is no reason to label him "done." Hopefully, he'll get healthy and be damn productive. The hamstring has affected his speed and cutting. It will improve (unless he re-injures it). Patience. Tony hasn't suddenly forgotten how to play basketball.
Oh man dat post is your best grats tbh
you, among all, is giving lessons of what is a spur fan
People were spending their time to ask why below your avatar you had team: San Antonio Spurs
you have been the biggest player fan of ST and now you are tired of player fans... How convenient.
dude you are a clown
The majority of the Spurs fans probably agree with his Parker's criticism. It's gotten to the point where he's now a liability on both ends of the floor. I sure hope he gets back to his usual self.Oh man dat post is your best grats tbh
you, among all, is giving lessons of what is a spur fan
People were spending their time to ask why below your avatar you had team: San Antonio Spurs
you have been the biggest player fan of ST and now you are tired of player fans... How convenient.
dude you are a clown
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
