Celtics: when will we see another dynasty?

[skut_farkus]

Lakers, Celtics and Bulls are really the only 3 dynasties in the nba, will we see another one in the future? Spurs, heat, pistons and rockets have all been close. Spurs possibly if they can go back to back imo instead of biennial

[~O~]

When LeBron becomes irrelevant.

[Technique]

You've been witnessing a dynasty for the past decade. Going back to back doesn't define a dynasty no matter what you tell yourself. No team in all of sports has been consistently elite as the Spurs. Even Shaq's lakers flamed out before their time.

[lefty]

As long as ....

[skut_farkus]

You've been witnessing a dynasty for the past decade. Going back to back doesn't define a dynasty no matter what you tell yourself. No team in all of sports has been consistently elite as the Spurs. Even Shaq's lakers flamed out before their time.

No. That's called being consistently inconsistent. 6 les or more would be a dynasty. Doing something twice is a fluke. But doing something 3 times in a row that's a dynasty.

[Technique]

No. That's called being consistently inconsistent. 6 les or more would be a dynasty. Doing something twice is a fluke. But doing something 3 times in a row that's a dynasty.

By your definition Shaq's lakers were a dynasty. Kobe/Gasol were fluky. You want 3, how about winning a championship in 3 different eras with the same core. This isn't tic tac to 3 in a row.

[Killakobe81]

You've been witnessing a dynasty for the past decade. Going back to back doesn't define a dynasty no matter what you tell yourself. No team in all of sports has been consistently elite as the Spurs. Even Shaq's lakers flamed out before their time.

You guys are a unique dynasty but usually a dyanstic team wins back to back. But you bring up a good points bird's celts never went backtoback but are the Pistons more of a "dynasty" even if their "reign" was shorter?I vote yes on the Spurs as a dynasty but there is SOMETHING to repeating that cements a dynasty.

[RsxPiimp]

OKC's time is coming. They've paid their dues and with the Spurs on a huge decline and Lebron's team no longer a threat, I'd be shocked if they don't win multiple les in the next 5 years. heck, they may even pull a Houston Rockets this season and surprise everyone in the playoffs.

[lefty]

WHEN WILL WE SEE

[Killakobe81]

No. That's called being consistently inconsistent. 6 les or more would be a dynasty. Doing something twice is a fluke. But doing something 3 times in a row that's a dynasty.

Not a fluke but nothing about the KoPau Lakers says dynasty except maybe the coach or the franchise itself. that team was good very good but not great and would lose to pretty much every repeat champion including an overrated Heat team ...

[skut_farkus]

The lakers franchise is a dynasty, the kobe Pau championships aren't considered a dynasty just a good run imo. Celtics, lakers, bulls are all dynasty franchises. Spurs Are Close but still not in their league

[FlAVaK]

WHEN WILL WE SEE

Tune into A&E Network on Wednesdays 9 pm ET

[unleashbaynes]

OKC's time is coming. They've paid their dues and with the Spurs on a huge decline and Lebron's team no longer a threat, I'd be shocked if they don't win multiple les in the next 5 years. heck, they may even pull a Houston Rockets this season and surprise everyone in the playoffs.

Scott Brooks says hi.

[Kool Bob Love]

No. That's called being consistently inconsistent. 6 les or more would be a dynasty. Doing something twice is a fluke. But doing something 3 times in a row that's a dynasty.

Bumping this thread June '16.

[RsxPiimp]

Scott Brooks says hi.

Could be replaced next season. His time is up tbh.

[skut_farkus]

Bumping this thread June '16.

This thread wouldn't exist if you guys handled your business June '14

[Splits]

dy·nas·ty

noun\ˈdī-nə-stē also -ˌnas-tē,especially British ˈdi-nə-stē\
: a family of rulers who rule over a country for a long period of time; also : the period of time when a particular dynasty is in power
: a family, team, etc., that is very powerful or successful for a long period of time

[sook]

spurs are a dynasty.

[100%duncan]

As long as kirby doesnt ring

[DMC]

This thread wouldn't exist if you guys handled your business June '14

We won the ring June '14

[DMC]

There are no dynasties in sports. If there were, the term wouldn't be so ing subjective. Show me the criteria for it or shut the up.

[100%duncan]

There are no dynasties in sports. If there were, the term wouldn't be so ing subjective. Show me the criteria for it or shut the up.

How bout this, les in 3 decades, with the same core. Tee hee.

[elmanutres]

You've been witnessing a dynasty for the past decade. Going back to back doesn't define a dynasty no matter what you tell yourself. No team in all of sports has been consistently elite as the Spurs. Even Shaq's lakers flamed out before their time.

methlahoma

sons their peak has past