We shall see, my friend.![]()
We shall see, my friend.![]()
Look up 2010 Carolina Panthers.
Do you even watch football?
The 2011 Panthers were Cam Newton, and..... that's it.
You can see.."it"....and Montana had .."it". It was so obvious, just like it was/is with Russell Wilson.
oh wow, look. none of those have 3 consecutive touchdown drives to end the game
Indeed. Is it too early to start calling Wilson the new "Comeback Kid"?![]()
Which was alot better than what Cam had when he arrived to Carolina. The Panthers were the worst team in the league before Cam got there.
Also Carroll didn't have a top 10 defense his first two seasons. Since RW was drafted, they've been the best defense in the league in each of his seasons.
Little man, I was watching JD Smith breaking tackles for the Niners in the early 60's, do I watch football..hahahaha!!!!!!!!! Where were you when the Jets beat the Colts in SB I? Not that it was called that back then. Do I watch footbalL...hahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Cam Newton is a loser, get used to it amigo.
cherry picking?
You said three touchdowns comebacks.. and I picked games where he made three PASSING touchdowns to come back solely... not even the games he made 3 TD comebacks.
no, i didn't
okay
Well Delhomme has done what Russell Wilson has done multiple times. It wasn't that special. I'm more concerned with 4 picks than one GW TD.
Are you really trying to compare Cam Newton to Russell Wilson, you gotta be kidding me.
Imagine what the Seahawks would have done to the Packers without those 5 turnovers. It would've been a slaughter. Unless the Pats can get 5 turnovers off the Seahawks, they're not winning the SB.
Talent wise there is a comparison. RW has more intangibles which is why he makes fewer mistakes, but Cam has the potential to be a more productive QB. Heck, he's only had a top 10 defense once in his 4 seasons and his team went 12-4.
This Seattle team isn't as strong as last year's team because the offense is alot weaker. The Pats don't need turnovers to win the game. They've been the best team in the league since week 4. Plus, this game isn't in Seattle.
It's not in New England, either.
I'll admit that getting Gronk back was huge...he completely changes the complexion of the Pats' offense. That said, the Seahawks have the #1 defense in the NFL, and it's not even close.
It should be a great Super Bowl!![]()
You keep doing that. Just like you're imagining Wilson is something spectacular.
You mean, like you imagine the Panthers winning a Super Bowl?![]()
Don't bother, man.
He's focused on one 300/100 game from Wilson.
More like, "wow, Wilson managed to avoid INT #5?"
3 > 0
Math > You
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)