Reply With Quote
Yup. Stalin just focused on killing his own people instead of taking on the rest of the world.
captain Sweden is a classic.
Sadly Sweden has to die in order to serve as an example to the rest. They are a degenerate self loathing people and don't deserve to exist. Their only hope at this point is russian invasion to save them from themselves, they just cannot stop compulsively slobbing Arab .
Yup. Stalin just focused on killing his own people instead of taking on the rest of the world.
Same thing is happening to Norway.
Yeah but Norway isn't nearly as bad yet outside of Oslo. I personally know some good nationalists in Norway and they are holding down the fort.
When's the last time you were in the Nordics?
Homebody who's never been to Sweden detected. According to wiki 20% or a fifth of their entire population isn't even Swedish. And it's gotten worse in these past 3 years, and you can rack on 200k more each year thereafter. What's left of their country will soon be unrecognizable.
As of 2011, Statistics Sweden reported that around 19.6% or 1.858.000 inhabitants of Sweden had foreign background, defined as born abroad or born in Sweden by two parents born abroad.[14]
Breivik was a smart guy, and wil one day be looked at as a hero. Have you read his manifesto?
I'm telling you, just give it ten to twenty years
The ten fastest growing groups of foreign-born residents in Sweden between 2012 and 2013 were the following nationalities:
I have family members who live in Norway.
Immigration to Sweden is the process by which people migrate to Sweden to reside in the country. Many, but not all, become Swedish citizens. The economic, social, and political aspects of immigration have caused controversy regarding ethnicity, economic benefits, jobs for non-immigrants, settlement patterns, impact on upward social mobility, crime, and voting behavior. As the Swedish state does not base any statistics on ethnicity, there are no exact numbers on the total number of people of immigrant background in Sweden.[1]
As of 2010, 1.33 million people or 14.3% of the inhabitants in Sweden were foreign-born. Of these, 859,000 (64.6%) were born outside the European Union and 477,000 (35.4%) were born in another EU member state.[2] Sweden has been transformed from a nation of net emigrationending after World War I to a nation of net immigration from World War II onwards. In 2013, immigration reached its highest level since records began with 115,845 people migrating to Sweden while the total population grew by 88,971.[3]
-most of their immigrants come from outside the EU
-immigration is increasing year over year
-immigrants have much higher birth rates
im sorry dude it sounds like you have emotional attachment to that country but soon it's all over. Fwiw I tthink it sucks but their wussiness pisses me off they did it to themselves.
So you read right-wing propaganda and treat it as truth without the curiosity to go see the situation first-hand. Got it.
On the other hand, I visit every 6 months, have friends and colleagues across the political spectrum, yet have never heard or seen your "argument" in reality. You're living in a racist fantasyland.
No different from the rest of Europe at this point.
Statistics straight from the government and posted to Wikipedia are "right wing propaganda?" Sorry dude just stating facts these issues are very well known and Sweden has become a big joke amongst european nationalist communities.
You seem to have alot of time on your hands.
Yeah, it's my ing job. I service big pharma. It just so happens that the most intelligent people on earth also happen to produce the most life-saving drugs on earth, and that includes the Swedes.
Please do tell about your European experiences. I'm quite interested in your travels.
Been to England, France, Germany, and Amsterdam. Kinda boring to be honest. Plus, the people seem to be socially awkward. Don't plan on going back anytime soon.
I'll leave you here with this and I'm going to bed
http://m.nationalreview.com/article/...n-daniel-pipes
DECEMBER 30, 2014 12:00 AMSweden to Opt for Suicide by Immigration?
Left and Right came together to marginalize popular concerns about immigration.
By Daniel Pipes
Woe to anyone in Sweden who dissents from the orthodox view that welcoming large numbers of indigent peoples from such countries as Iraq, Syria, and Somalia is anything but a fine and noble idea. Even to argue that permitting about 1 percent of the existing population to emigrate annually from an alien civilization renders one politically, socially, and even legally beyond the pale. (I know a journalist threatened with arrest for mild dissent on this issue.) Stating that there exists a Swedish culture worth preserving meets with puzzlement.And yet, the realities of immigration are apparent for all to see: welfare dependency, violent bigotry against Christians and Jews, and a wide range of social pathologies from unemployment to politically motivated rape. Accordingly, ever-increasing numbers of Swedes find themselves — despite known hazards — opting out of the consensus and worrying about their country’s cultural suicide.
AdvertisementThe taboo on such at udes means that political parties, with only one exception, staunchly support continued immigration. Only the Sweden Democrats (SD) offer an alternative: real efforts to integrate existing immigrants and a 90 percent decrease in future immigration. Despite an unsavory neo-fascist past (not something unique to it, by the way), SD has become increasingly respectable and has been rewarded with electoral success, doubling its parliamentary vote from 3 percent in 2006, to 6 percent in 2010, to 13 percent in 2014. All the Swedes with whom I spoke on a recent visit expect the SD vote to grow further, something recent polls confirm.If a party or bloc of parties held a large majority in Sweden’s unicameral parliament, SD would be virtually irrelevant. But the Riksdag’s two blocs are almost equally balanced. Three left-wing parties control 159 of 349 seats, while the “right wing” (quotation marks to denote that, from an American perspective, it’s hardly conservative) Alliance for Sweden, consisting of four parties, has 141 seats. This means that SD, with 49 seats, holds the balance of power.
But SD is deemed anathema, so no party bargains with it to pass legislation, not even indirectly through the media. Both Left and “Right” seek to isolate and discredit it. Nevertheless, SD has played kingmaker on certain crucial legislation, particularly the annual budget. In keeping with its policy to drive from power every government that refuses to reduce immigration, it brought down an Alliance for Sweden government in early 2014. Recent weeks saw a repeat of this scenario, when SD joined the Alliance in opposing the leftist budget, forcing the government to call for elections in March 2015.
But then something remarkable occurred: The two major blocs compromised not only on the current budget, but also on future budgets and power-sharing all the way to 2022. The left and “right” alliances worked out trade-offs so that elections need not take place in March, allowing the Left to rule until 2018, with the “Right” possibly taking over from 2018 until 2022. Not only does this political cartel deprive SD of its pivotal role but, short of winning a majority of parliamentary seats in 2018, it has no meaningful legislative role for the next eight years, during which time the immigration issue is off the table.
This is nothing short of astonishing: To stifle debate over the country’s most contentious issue, 86 percent of the parliament joined forces to marginalize the 14 percent that disagrees. The two major blocs diluted their already tepid differences to exclude the insurgent, populist party. Mattias Karlsson, the acting SD leader, accurately notes that with this deal, his party has become the only real opposition.
In the long term, however, things look good for SD, which will likely gain from this undemocratic sleight of hand. Swedes, long accustomed to democracy, do not appreciate a backroom arrangement that almost surely nullifies their votes in 2018. They don’t like its bullying quality. Nor do they take well to removing a highly controversial issue from consideration. And when the time comes to “throw the bums out,” as always it does, the Sweden Democrats will offer the only alternative to the tired, fractious coalition that will have been in power for eight long years — during which time immigration problems will alarm yet more voters.
In other words, this blatant act of suppression is spurring the very debate it is intended to quash. Before too long, the supreme issue of national suicide might actually be discussed.
— Daniel Pipes is president of the Middle East Forum. © 2014 by Daniel Pipes. All rights reserved.
It's just a numbers game really. 8-9 million population, 15-20% already foreign born, 200k immigrants annually, low domestic birth rates. It'll be over swiftly.
Same thing was said about Switzerland 25 years ago when they allowed 200k Yugoslavs (mostly Muslim) to gain citizenship. And they're basically the most stable and wealthy country in the world today.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
