Reply With Quote
16>5 tbh
16>5 tbh
You need to off bruh and wait till Kobe retires maybe then you can post here
Misleading
Not the franchise with most wins (ie winningest)
Just the franchise with the highest percentage of wins
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/showthread.php?t=244381
Props to Spurs the Duncan era has really upped the percentage will be interesting to see where it ends up post duncan.
BTW, teams that trail the Spurs have 17, 16 and 6 les ... my guess you would trade that for this ...
Laker Troll still trying to ride the Minneapolis Lakers 1949 le.
Get a life!
Stop being re ed.
Well, 1947-present > 1973-present
Do you cherish a team that won against midgets in a 10 team league?
I'd give someone the props if he's old enough to witness all but I bet no one is.
lol 40's
Nope. Doesnt matter, tbh. Most yankee fans havent seen all theirs Celts the same. I get recent history matters more but once it's over (the season after the le it's ALL history. the banners still hang no matter when they are won.Do you cherish a team that won against midgets in a 10 team league?
I'd give someone the props if he's old enough to witness all but I bet no one is.
lol 40's
And it's still impressive (the % record) I was not diminishing that but we had the top spot before you and I would trade that for the 17 the Celts have. In, the end it's all that matters ... les.
However I do admit being alive for 10 and watching religiously for the last 8 does make those matter more to me. But I dont act like the other 8 didnt happen. And I would take another 2 years of sorry Lakers ball if you could promise me we would ring after. Im sure the almost 7 years drought and even 6 was worth it for #5.
You don't get credit for rings before you hopped aboard, and don't lie about it.
Still claiming Minneapolis Laker championships are we? ....Typical Fakers16>5 tbh
These guys get it, tbh.Do you cherish a team that won against midgets in a 10 team league?
I'd give someone the props if he's old enough to witness all but I bet no one is.
lol 40's
LOL your standards ...
I already stated which ones I watched I claim em all even minny and you can deny them ...
Yet you use the false number every time. Why can't anyone here just select the Celtics on day one and just like that have more rings than you? See how easy that was?
Spurs had 5 les in my lifetime and all while the NBA League Pass was available for me to watch. Would definitely take this over those old les spread over someone else's life.
Only one I can see close would be the 6 Bulls les.
But I'd still rather have these last 15 seasons and 5 les where there was always a decent chance of Spurs going all the way. Looking forward to every season knowing that I might get 2 extra months of Spurs basketball.
Yeah but winning percentage is more impressive. Total wins are confounded by time in existence, so obviously older franchises will tend to have more wins. But winning percentage tells you how successful a team has been during its existence.
I agree the les I saw mean the most to me ...I said that above.
No false numbers ... they are what they say the are.
all your sarcastic, pithy and condescending remarks and sardonic jabs change nothing. Same as Kool's comments does not change 5.
Last edited by Killakobe81; 02-12-2015 at 01:28 PM.
aka sticks and stones etc...
My words aren't an attempt to change the facts, but to make them apparent. Apparently you have no right to claim rings you weren't even around for, lies be damned.
Lakers have many more years in the nba and the whole league doing anything they can to help them win.
Well, it is. Did you have a rebuttal?
Here's a hypothetical...
Team A has existed for 30 years and won 20 games per year = 600 total wins, percentage of .244.
Team B has existed for 10 years and won 50 games per year = 500 total wins, percentage of .610.
Which is more impressive?
Highest winning percentage*
There are teams with 17, 16 and 6 championships.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions