Reply With Quote
Chicago will probably be better without Rose.
Typical of the Spurs season that he was efficient and aggressive against them though tbh
Rose has a meniscus tear and is out for the rest of the year. He ed us over in the off-season along with his lover tspence. Look who's ed now? Good move, asshole!
Chicago will probably be better without Rose.
Typical of the Spurs season that he was efficient and aggressive against them though tbh
why would he regret it? He lost his cancerous PG, they will probably improve and Gasol will get more shots..
Pau eats first in Chicago now..in San Antonio, theres only 1 Spur eating well on the team at the moment..he's not sharing that food with anybody..
No. He's 25th out of 79 among PGs in wins above replacement and 33rd out of 79 in real plus minus numbers and have trouble scoring. He will be missed.
The stats don't support your argument against Rose, tbh.
Pau eats first in Chicago now..in San Antonio, theres only 1 Spur eating well on the team at the moment..he's not sharing that food with anybody..
Yes, they do..
He has a -2.3 RAPM and his BPM and VORP are at or near the worst on the team..
He is their Parker, I made the comparison earlier in the year..
Maybe they won't be better because the alternatives are Brooks and Hinrich(2 awful players) but Rose is just a name, at this point, he hasn't been a good basketball player in over 2 years..
Been hitting that buffet with the other fat Frenchie
Brooks and Heinrich are the reasons why the Bulls are done now. We also can't deny the offensive superiority Rose has over those guys and the intangibles he brings to the team, like the ability to hit GW shots and to step his game up in the fourth quarter. He's definitely not nearly the MVP he was before, but he was still a vital player for them. That's all over now.
OP needs to get over that trade, tbh.
"It's all about the Benjamins, baby..."
Chicago developed a "non-Rose" game while that got was nursing his pussy for a decade. They'll be fine. Jimmy Butler will actually get the ball again.
He has $22M reasons not to regret signing with Chicago.
Not when we're 7th seed, struggling, and have to watch our bigs not named Duncan playing like es thus putting more pressure on our 38 (soon to 39) year old player to carry the large load inside.
It's not like he was hurting for money before.
More or less identical records and the Bulls are in the East.
Point being, if we had him, our record would be much better.
^^ YEP, who would think otherwise is a fool.
Not seeing how he regrets anything. He gets paid very well and has the 2nd most shots attempts on the team after Rose. With the chucker gone, his touches will most likely go up. Even with Rose playing next to him, he was still averaging more FGAs than anyone on SA. On the Spurs he would have had a significantly reduced role compared to what he gets in Chicago.
So basically, he doesn't care about ringing again?
Gasol has always complained about his shots and role, tbh..
I'm sure he cares about winning, but he also cares about being a primary option..
Well, he'll be the primary option on a team that won't ring nor come out of the East. He would've had his share of shot attempts with us and we'd see him in the starting lineup instead of Baynes.
It always amazes me how this board is so close-minded when it comes to understanding FAs decisions.
I know this might be a shocker, but some people would rather get paid several millions more + play more minutes/have a bigger role + play in Chicago rather than SA. These guys aren't robots whose only interest is winning.
And regardless, it's not like SA's outlook for winning is that bright at the moment. We play in the much tougher conference. We obviously won last year, but people knew we'd be a year older and a lot of our most important guys our in their 30s.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
