This is a serious and non-sarcastic question: If you truly believe that Parker was bad last year and we won anyway, and if you truly believe that the Spurs are a better team without him (I'm not questioning anyone's analytics here - if the numbers show we are better without him, then we are), then why can't we win with him playing so poorly this year?
I am not defending Tony at all. I don't hate him like some do in here, but I am totally baffled by how a player's shot ability has disappeared so completely so rapidly. He does in fact look just terrible out there, and I, along with most team fans, would love to see some other pg run the team as a starter.
The question remains, though, that if Parker was always unimportant to the team's success, why is his lack of value this year such a contributor to the team's losses?
It seems only fair to note, as others have, that the entire TEAM, excluding only Tim, has 'lost their shot' this year. Everyone's three point shooting percentages are way down from last year and that cannot be wholly attributable to Tony's undeniable decline. When NO ONE can find their shot, something besides the dramatic decline of one player must be included as the causal factor(s).
At this point I would LOVE to see Tony only play 15 minutes a game. LOVE it. But it does seem that if we could win without him playing well last year we could win without him playing well this year.