Reply With Quote
You're re ed. Brees racks up attempts because he's a real franchise QB whose team expects to win games on his arm. Struggle is the exact opposite.
Rodney Peete > Struggle, then.Dude, QB's are judged by wins, ok?
First QB to ever throw a pick on the 1 yd line to lose a Superbowl.
Just making sure you had all your bases covered. You may continue.
You're re ed. Brees racks up attempts because he's a real franchise QB whose team expects to win games on his arm. Struggle is the exact opposite.
Rodney Peete > Struggle, then.Dude, QB's are judged by wins, ok?
He just keeps on with it because Avante responds to him. He and others have ran it into the ground so much that it really has little to no value.
First QB to play in two SB's in his first three seasons.
If certain gots didn't try to compare Struggle to franchise quarterbacks who have a lot more responsibilities and worse supporting casts than he does, there wouldn't be an issue. The whole "Struggle = greatest three-year QB ever while ignoring all context" schtick causes people to actively dislike him. I have zero problem with anyone else on Seattle and was rooting for the Seahawks in the last two SB's, though.
Why do you keep ignoring the fact no QB in the league has had more game winning drives than RW since he came in the league? Why keep ignoring the fact his receivers are the worst gang of any winning team? Why keep ignoring the fact when he does throw his stats are amazing?
Where did you ever get this stupid....ya gotta throw gotta throw...bull ? Stupid, ya gotta win win and win....ok?
Context?
Has RW started every game, yep!
Has he won more games, yep!
Are his stats superior to anyones, yep!
Has he done things never seen before, yep!
Those are the facts little man, context???
The run/pass ratio has swung dramatically in favor of the passing game since the mid-'70s. It's not bull , it's statistical fact.
Does Struggle have Lynch and a stacked defense, yep!
Did he walk into a better situation than the majority of rookie QB's, yep!
I get a kick out of it.
Guy was brought in to back up the big $$$$ man, so what's he do, he beats him out then precedes to have the best first three seasons we have ever seen from any QB. The guy is amazing. And then here comes this ing moron CN who knows zero about football looking totally moronic, yep, it's funny.
Was he not brought in to sit the bench, yep! Did the Lions win with Barry Sanders? Did the Vikes win with Peterson? Did the Chiefs win with Charles? Tons of great RB's who never won . Does he have any "great" receivers? Does he play in the best division in football?
Figure it out dummy, ok?
Put him in the AFC South, hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!! , the NFC South.
Last edited by Avante; 03-11-2015 at 12:19 PM.
I'll go slow....
The run/pass ratio has swung dramatically in favor of the passing game since the mid-'70s. It's not bull , it's statistical fact.
Hey stupid, tell me why the Niners and Seahawks have ruled the NFC the last five years? Now think ya dumb ? Was it the passing game?
Pay attention.....
It doesn't matter what the league numbers are, a team that can run the ball and stuff the run will always be in the mix. Lok at the Cowboys in 2014, what was the big difference...A RUNNING BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Now tell me again ya ing moron about how ya must throw the football.
Dummy, a dominating running game is really what all football teams want. You really don't know this do ya stupid? Teams don't wanna be in third and long, honest. And they want to beat a team down, you do that how....RUNNING THE BALL! How do you protect a lead....RUN THE BALL!!!!!!!!! How do ya control the time, RUN THE BALLL!!!!!!!!!!!!
Like talking to a little kid, sheesh~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Funny how...."it's Marshawn Lynch" and "the Colts need a running back"
Then, but ya gotta throw the ball....hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Avante; 03-11-2015 at 12:29 PM.
Yeah Brees really needs protection up the middle due to his height. During his peak years our interior lineman were among the best in the league. Pressure up the middle is his biggest weakness and our center play has been below average the last 3 seasons. Hopefully Unger can stay healthy and we can use that future cap room to build the roster. Our offense will always be very good with Brees and Payton.I agree. I really hope Max stays healthy, his impact will be felt instantaneously. He was one of my favorite players while in a Hawks uniform. He'll fit effortlessly, very intelligent player. Not to mention you now have two first round picks, niiiice
Graham will really give RW that red zone weapon he's been lacking. Expect RW's TDs to go up.
I'll go slow....
An offense wants to be in third and 2, ok? Now it's "will they run or pass". Ya with me? That's the value of having a running game. ok"? If in constant third and 6, guess what? Now how about those bad weather games in Jan? Think about it.
The 85 Bears the perfect example of a great football team. The perfect team actually. They had a stud back in Walter Payton and a monster D. That's what wins at all levels of football. That will never change.
He was not brought in to warm the bench. Carroll is all for open compe ion moreso than most coaches. Struggle was always going to get a chance to compete for the starting job.
It's amazing how you've flip-flopped from "you have to run to win games" to "RB's don't win and Struggle doesn't have enough weapons in the passing game" to prop up Struggle. Face it, you're a fanboy. You'll say literally anything to defend Struggle even if it contradicts your prior excuses.
How about a tad bit of reality amigo, ok?
When Russell Wilson got to Seattle as a rookie third-round draft choice in 2012, he was initially buried on the Seahawks’ depth chart behind Matt Flynn and Tarvaris Jackson.
Two years into his regime as a first-time general manager, former Packers executive John Schneider signed Flynn, Green Bay’s backup to Aaron Rodgers, to a $26 million contract with $10 million guaranteed to get his first NFL starting job for Seattle.
Read more here: http://blog.thenewstribune.com/seaha...#storylink=cpy
Wow!
All teams want to run the ball, ok little man? That is the key to winning football games at all levels, ok? You are winning the time of possesion, controlling the clock, your D is getting a blow. And you are protecting your QB, and less chance of a turnover, ok?
We've seen both ends of the spectrum, teams dominate because they can run and stuff the run and teams that could run but not stop the run, ya with me moron?
Now think ya dumb , ok?
So they sign Flynn to a huge contract then draft a guy in the "third" round in hopes he can win the job, hahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
CN, you gotta be about the dumbest I've ever seen, dead serious!
Schneider....I just signed Flynn for all that $$$$ for the of it coach. See if Jackson or that rokie can make me look stupid, ok?
Carroll...ok?
Hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Last edited by Avante; 03-11-2015 at 01:08 PM.
The Whiners haven't "ruled" jack . You won the NFC once. By that logic, the Chargers "ruled" the AFC in the '90s. Franchise and near-franchise quarterbacks like Rodgers, Brees, and Eli, who are asked to win the game with their arm, have "ruled" the NFC more than the Decliners have.
The difference was Romo getting healthy and improvements to the O-line and defense.Pay attention.....
It doesn't matter what the league numbers are, a team that can run the ball and stuff the run will always be in the mix. Lok at the Cowboys in 2014, what was the big difference...A RUNNING BACK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
A running back hasn't been drafted in the first round in years, playcalling trends have overwhelmingly favored the passing game league-wide since the '70s, and coaches have started using the short passing game as a subs ute for the running game dating back to Bill Walsh and the West Coast Offense. When teams are winning playoff games without handing the ball off once in the entire second half and winning Super Bowls with an RB by committee, it seems teams aren't really worried about having a dominating running game anymore.Dummy, a dominating running game is really what all football teams want.
Damn you're dumb.
What teams have represented the NFC in the last three SB's, and in the NFC Championship games the last five, well?
DeMarco Murray was why the Cowboys had the success they did in 2014, you really don't get that? Wow!
So tell me guy what team has won more games than anyone the last three seasons, yep...Seahawks! Do they run the ball?
Why do the Colts always come up short, oh yeah....no running game! So who was their first big acquisition....???
Dude, why throw the ball if you can pound it, now think...ok? The problem is most teams can't run the ball so they are forced to throw.
A pro team wants to do all they can to keep that D fresh, now think stupid, ok?
The thing about running backs is that the ones coming out of college have those young legs and no wear and tear from NFL seasons, so you can get a solid back later. And there just isn't a huge difference in backs most the time. Some exceptions. , Emmitt Smith had a career average of just 4.2.
When RW signs his new contract, tell me again about how he's not a franchise QB, ok dummy?
Last edited by Avante; 03-11-2015 at 01:28 PM.
Hey CN, who were those rookie QB's that started right off winning games, ok? Those who never sat on the bench at all and by year four had already played in two SB's. Who were they?
The Niners were only good from 2011-2013. How is that 5 years? The Seahawks have had their run from 2012-2014? How was is that 5 years?
Lynch was the only dominant rusher to win a Super Bowl in the last 5 years unless you include a declining Ray Rice, but Flacco was the horse of that team.
I was talking about....
Niners in the NFC le game from 2011-2013 and the Seahawks being there in 2013/2014, that's five.
My point is we are seeing what a stud running game can do if a team can also play defense. You do not need to pass the ball all over the place if you can do that. The thing is most teams can't do that.
The key to the NFL is putting a team in third and long while you're in third and short.
There's Andrew Luck in that constant third and 6, so what's he have to do, yep, throw the ball. Is RW in that situation?
But you also need a QB to make plays to win those big games which RW has done and what CK did earlier. No way the Niners get to the Super Bowl and win at Atlanta with Alex Smith.
Alex Smith would have been in a SB if not for a couple fumbles by a kick returner. yes Alex Smith could make a SB, just like Dilfer, Humphries, Eason, Johnson.
The team wasn't driving with Alex Smith in the 4th or OT. Constant 3 and outs. Giants were most likely to get a play or two from Eli than the Niners were with Alex Smith. He was terrible in the 2nd half of that game. Even if Williams didn't fumble in OT, who's to say the Niners were gonna score? They couldn't move the ball. And no way Smith would have led a comeback at Atlanta down 17-0. He couldn't make enough plays like CK did. And if the Saints would have played a prevent defense than no way the Niners get to the NFC le game. And they would have laid the hammer on the Giants in the Superdome. That Giants defense had no chance against that offense.
Stan Humphries was more talented than Smith. Threw a much better deep ball which was perfect for that Chargers offense in the 90s.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
