Reply With Quote
Golbert didn't come out of no where, tbh. He was pretty hyped.
Both are young bigs who came out of no where and providing an enormous amount of value as a defensive anchor.
Who would you choose, and why?
Golbert didn't come out of no where, tbh. He was pretty hyped.
Hard to say but I will go with Golbert. Whiteside seems to have maturity problems at times
Golbert isn't a headcase and has a ton of potential. Whiteside's athletic but I doubt he'll ever be a consistent offensive force.
I would personally take Golbert at this point (see the Jazz subject and him first on the polls).
As mentioned by other posters, he seems to be more mature, less foul-prone, and is a better dirty work guy.
On the other hand, Whiteside seems more athletic, and seems to have a higher offensive upside (aside from horrendous FT shooting).
Gobert..ridiculous armspan, and looks like he is still filling out his frame. We should have had the bas , but instead got stuck w/ Livio.
Gobert all the way. Whiteside is american; euros have more mild mannered behaviour and learn faster.
out of no where? BSPN hyped the out of these guys.... but to answer your question I must say Golbeert.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
