Is this a cross platform patch or just PC? Haven't played Dying Light in a few days, this would make it more interesting
I can't wait to find my first gold weapon.
![]()
Is this a cross platform patch or just PC? Haven't played Dying Light in a few days, this would make it more interesting
Everything. Ps4 got it already from what I'm reading.
NiceI'll have to get down on that
Is this game THAT good? To see the resident techies foaming at the mouth for it..umm maybe I'll pick this up along with Project cars in a few weeks.
It's ing crack. Sucked me completely into that world.Best game I've played in quite some time.
I shoot it between my toes. Yeah, it's that good. It's rare that I bootleg a game and go back and buy it. The gore, the skills, the physics, the graphics, the co-op..this game is the .
What new weapons did they add??
It's easily the best game I have played since Skyrim.
Damn, Dying Light is not kind at all to AMD hardware, and this is even with the 1.4.0 patch.
http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/...ysis,4060.html
FX-9590
I know the R9 290x looks pretty ty in this benchmark too, but that's the exception. By contrast the FX-9590's ty performance is the rule.
220W CPU that needs to be watercooled and used with a $150 board
piece of CPU launching at $1000 like it was an i7-5960x or some
$110 Core i3s outperform it in most games
Bulldozer
Piledriver
AMD is absolute trash, always will be. Cost to performance ratio is a stupid ass argument anyway IMO, if you're pinching pennies PC gaming is probably not the best hobby.
Also, it's the 1.5 patch that supposedly fixed the AMD issues.
AMD is crap now, but Intel used to be the guys putting out garbage CPUs until Conroe came out in 2006. And AMD CPUs were still pretty awesome until Bulldozer. Ever since then they have been for CPUs.
I don't know what the AMD is thinking with their CPU strategy though. Who is buying one of their $150 A10 APUs? If I'm building an office PC or a multimedia PC why am I buying that over a $110 i3 that works great with HD Graphics 4600 (or even better Iris Graphics once Broadwell and Skylake hit)? If I'm building a gaming PC at the low end I'm much better off with a $110 i3 and a $100 R7 260x. Plus you can only Crossfire their APUs with R7 250x or lower.
AMD dying is gonna add at least 100.00 bucks to everything Intel and Nvidia makes![]()
At least AMD GPUs are compe ive, and often better bang for the buck and overall faster than Intel.
Nvidia still has nothing good in the $150-$250 range that most gamers buy their GPUs in. Supposedly AMD is releasing the R9 370/370x next month though, which will probably get Nvidia off their lazy asses to release a decent midrange GPU to fill the huge performance gap between the 960 and 970.
and there's the infamous "price to performance ratio" argument..
If price to performance doesn't matter you should go get SLI an X tbh
Done..Tri-SLI tbh
Truth. 4-way usually gets less performance than 3-way in game.![]()
It's better priced AND faster, regardless of cost.
Just finished the game. Very disappointing ending.
I know, I wanted to creampie Jade, even after.
ing last building is hard though, even with mouse and keyboard.
What were you expecting tbh? I was more disappointed with the actual sequence between Rais and Crane, much like how you "fight" Sauron at the end of SoM. But I hadn't done any sidequests when I beat it so I had tons of game to play
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)