Reply With Quote
Most overrated MVP of all time. The fact that he won back to back MVPs is laughable.
revolutionized
@JMcDonald_SAEN: Steve Nash completely and utterly revolutionized basketball. Other than that, I agree, zero impact.
Most overrated MVP of all time. The fact that he won back to back MVPs is laughable.
Best pg since Stockton. C3P0 is the better "all around player" but his nuts shrink in big games
in before the inevitable'Rique's 4 rings say otherwise'
But yeah Nash was pretty special. The Suns weren't before they signed him and he made them instant conyenders.
if that lefty took a taco bell diarrhea on a piece of paper and gave it to me to read, it'd be better writing than what McDonald puts out there
Nash is the best PG shooter I've ever seen. Better than Stephen Curry, better than anyone.
IMO, Jason Kidd was better than Nash .
Spurs own Nash
Who?
Nash wreaked a lot of offensive havoc and was ultra-compe ive. He got a lot out his athletic abilities. Smart and hard to ever count out.
Horry was smarter though, and, subsequently, Nash will be a first ballot Hall of Famer without a ring. Chris Paul may be in the same boat a few years behind him.
Jeff Mcdonald's twitter fights are some of the saddest things I've ever seen. Dude gets into it with anyone who baits him, and never acknowledges the validity of opposing viewpoints. Just generally an asshole.
Buck Harvey and Mike Monroe are just fine, but Jeff Mcdonald is by far the most active twitter user and by far the worst.
true
David Aldridge is a huge got too
He tweeted Westbrook's birthdate; that's right
Who gives a flying about RW's birthdate; someone replied to his tweet by advising him to post more interesting stuff, and DA blocked him
Spurs put s ches on Nash.
Nash was incredible offensively, such a ridiculous shooter and I agree with the poster above who agreed that he was superior in that regard to Curry.
Never really worried me against the Spurs though, Parker was generally very good against him.
The fingerprints of 7 seconds or less are all over the league right now.
I just thank him for everything he did to the Lakers F.O.one of the GOATs
Kinda unfair for Rique imho. Paul is on a higher level of choking in the post-season, atleast TP had his moments like the 2013 playoffs, 2007 finals Bin before the inevitable'Rique's 4 rings say otherwise
But yeah Nash was pretty special. The Suns weren't before they signed him and he made them instant conyenders.
MVParker 4 > Nash 0
D'Antoni got that from Paul Westhead. Nothing revolutionary about what he did. Goes for Nash too. He played the system he was in. Small ball? See Don Nelson.
I'll take Parker
Tbh I'd rather be the guy who got it done when nobody thought he could than be the one who never did when everyone knew he should.Kinda unfair for Rique imho. Paul is on a higher level of choking in the post-season, atleast TP had his moments like the 2013 playoffs, 2007 finals B
It wasn't until Steve Nash it was a legit championship contender.
And yes they were a legit contender. The 2007 Spurs/Suns series was the real NBA finals. Without a Robert Horry hip check, the entire legacy of Nash/D'Antoni would have been totally different. Also game 3 was notorious for being a rigged game.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2...simmons/070722
Technically, MVParker has 6 if you count the two marriages, so same as Kobe's 6 (though he did have to buy Vanessa another huge rock in the mid-2000s...)
The system artificially inflated Nash's numbers such that he racked up assists and shots at the expense of defense. Note that not only did Nash's stats go up with the Suns, every point guard that went against him posted MVP numbers on that night. He was overrated and won Two MVPs that stand for Most Valuable to the Press. Sportswriters liked him so they voted him as the MVP even though he wasn't near the best player and never made an NBA Finals.
best of all, he thinks he wins those troll arguments.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
