2012 GOP threat: Sgt. Bergdahl swap will be Obama, Democrats’ ‘Willie Horton moment

[TheSanityAnnex]

I question the sincerity of the desire to close Gitmo tbh. Unless Ive missed something, there's not been alot of activity on that initiative. Words? Yes. Actions? Doesnt appear to be much.

Obama said he'd close it down the day he took office, 6 years later....

[HI-FI]

i thought you were going to expound? Explain to me the logic and reason for swapping those high ranking five for this piece of who at the time was thought to be, and as we now know, a deserter.

Had Obama known his top military brass would ignore the pressure from his White House to let Bergdal quietly fade out of the public's memory as a hero and rescued POW, and instead charge him with desertion upon return I doubt this swap would have ever happened. Just another blunder for Obama that again shows how incompetent and truly unfit he is to run this country. I hope you are ashamed for voting for him the first time.

is unreal. This has to be the worst trade I can remember, trying to think of a sports equivalent as bad. I knew from the beginning that HNIC wasn't a leader, fortunately for him the media still enjoys being a semen shield.

[TheSanityAnnex]

is unreal. This has to be the worst trade I can remember, trying to think of a sports equivalent as bad. I knew from the beginning that HNIC wasn't a leader, fortunately for him the media still enjoys being a semen shield.

Kwame Brown for Pau Gasol

[Th'Pusher]

i thought you were going to expound? Explain to me the logic and reason for swapping those high ranking five for this piece of who at the time was thought to be, and as we now know, a deserter.

Had Obama known his top military brass would ignore the pressure from his White House to let Bergdal quietly fade out of the public's memory as a hero and rescued POW, and instead charge him with desertion upon return I doubt this swap would have ever happened. Just another blunder for Obama that again shows how incompetent and truly unfit he is to run this country. I hope you are ashamed for voting for him the first time.

are you capable of interacting without turning into an emotional wreck? I just explained it to you. The logic was to remove prisoners from gitmo.

[TheSanityAnnex]

are you capable of interacting without turning into an emotional wreck? I just explained it to you. The logic was to remove prisoners from gitmo.

Dude, do you really think your calling people emotional schtick is the least bit effective? It is one of the stupidest things I've seen on this board and it's your go to line. Seriously, point out for me a part of my post that would be an "emotional wreck". And if you try the emotional wreck part because I called him a piece of you are sorrier than I thought.

you didn't expound on anything, you repeated what cosmic said. I asked you to explain the logic in swapping the high ranking five for the at the time assumed deserter. Stop dodging a straight forward question. You know it was a huge up it's just too hard for you to admit since Obama used to be your guy.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I wonder how long it will take before the military brass that ignored the pressure from the White House are slowly relieved of their positions.

[Th'Pusher]

Dude, do you really think your calling people emotional schtick is the least bit effective? It is one of the stupidest things I've seen on this board and it's your go to line. Seriously, point out for me a part of my post that would be an "emotional wreck". And if you try the emotional wreck part because I called him a piece of you are sorrier than I thought.

you didn't expound on anything, you repeated what cosmic said. I asked you to explain the logic in swapping the high ranking five for the at the time assumed deserter. Stop dodging a straight forward question. You know it was a huge up it's just too hard for you to admit since Obama used to be your guy.

I only use the emotional characterization when it's applicable. You realize you'r now getting emotional about me using the emotional schtick, right?

Everything Obama does has you reeling and you can't even see it. He ing spins you like a top.

And I answered your stupid question. The deal was made for the sole purpose of removing prisoners from gitmo, regardless of the cost. You're so ing frazzled you can't even comprehend the most basic response. You want more! You want me to be angry like you! Sorry. I can't accommodate.

[Th'Pusher]

is unreal. This has to be the worst trade I can remember, trying to think of a sports equivalent as bad. I knew from the beginning that HNIC wasn't a leader, fortunately for him the media still enjoys being a semen shield.

Tractor Traylor for Nowitzki.

[TheSanityAnnex]

I only use the emotional characterization when it's applicable. You realize you'r now getting emotional about me using the emotional schtick, right?

I see you ignored pointing out anything that could construed as emotional in that post, want to try again? pointing out the stupidity of your go to line is not emotional. Are you capable of interacting with others online without resorting to your childish ineffective tactic? Serious question.

Everything Obama does has you reeling and you can't even see it. He ing spins you like a top.

Knowing what you know now, would you still be I favor of this swap?

And I answered your stupid question. The deal was made for the sole purpose of removing prisoners from gitmo, regardless of the cost. You're so ing frazzled you can't even comprehend the most basic response. You want more! You want me to be angry like you! Sorry. I can't accommodate.

Doing something while disregarding the cost is not logical. And I'm not angry in the least bit, I enjoy watching those who voted for this unqualified excuse for a President try and spin mistake after mistake.

I really think you have a problem interpreting written words on a message board, maybe it's just you projecting emotion into everything you read.

[TheSanityAnnex]

PS....refrain from exclamation marks, they make you appear a bit emotional. I truly don't want more or for you to be angry.

[Th'Pusher]

I see you ignored pointing out anything that could construed as emotional in that post, want to try again? pointing out the stupidity of your go to line is not emotional. Are you capable of interacting with others online without resorting to your childish ineffective tactic? Serious question.

Knowing what you know now, would you still be I favor of this swap?


Doing something while disregarding the cost is not logical. And I'm not angry in the least bit, I enjoy watching those who voted for this unqualified excuse for a President try and spin mistake after mistake.

I really think you have a problem interpreting written words on a message board, maybe it's just you projecting emotion into everything you read.

you're not fooling anyone. We all know you're angry. Was it Barry's gun grabbing that sent you over the edge? I think it was the gun grabbing.

[TheSanityAnnex]

you're not fooling anyone. We all know you're angry. Was it Barry's gun grabbing that sent you over the edge? I think it was the gun grabbing.

Except I'm not angry. Nice job ignoring all questions and deflecting though.

[Th'Pusher]

Except I'm not angry.

[TheSanityAnnex]

Now that I've had time to cool down are you going to answer any of the questions or continue on deflecting with emoticons?

[Th'Pusher]

Now that I've had time to cool down are you going to answer any of the questions or continue on deflecting with emoticons?

What are your questions TSA?

[TheSanityAnnex]

What are your questions TSA?

They start on post #155

[Spurminator]

Support for our troops only goes so far I guess.

[Th'Pusher]

They start on post #155

You're going to need to spell them out for me. I don't know what you want me to say. I've explained what I believe to be Obama's logic in releasing the prisoners. Obama's decision upsets you and it's clearly evident in the tone of your response. Here's an example:

...Explain to me the logic and reason for swapping those high ranking five for this piece of who at the time was thought to be, and as we now know, a deserter.

Had Obama known his top military brass would ignore the pressure from his White House to let Bergdal quietly fade out of the public's memory as a hero and rescued POW, and instead charge him with desertion upon return I doubt this swap would have ever happened. Just another blunder for Obama that again shows how incompetent and truly unfit he is to run this country. I hope you are ashamed for voting for him the first time.

The bolded is hyperbolic emotional tripe.

I point it out. You don't like it. Here we are.

[TheSanityAnnex]

You're going to need to spell them out for me. I don't know what you want me to say. I've explained what I believe to be Obama's logic in releasing the prisoners. Obama's decision upsets you and it's clearly evident in the tone of your response. Here's an example:



The bolded is hyperbolic emotional tripe.

I point it out. You don't like it. Here we are.

you skipped quite a few questions, do you need them bolded?
And you really do have a problem interpreting written content if you read that as emotional, unless of course you view Obama as competent.

[Clipper Nation]

is unreal. This has to be the worst trade I can remember, trying to think of a sports equivalent as bad.

The Herschel Walker trade, or the Ricky Williams trade.

[Th'Pusher]

You're going to need to spell them out for me.

you skipped quite a few questions, do you need them bolded?

I guess bolding is fine.