pgardn has an "argument"to run away from?
Fish on.pgardn has an "argument"
By far the worst conflict in the world lacks the involvement of any powerful countries. And it continues in the eastern part of the Congo. What lessons should we, the U.S., have learned about this conflict?
Tell us o great one.
What should we have done if anything, to help prevent the deaths of 5.4 million people, the worst human disaster since WWII?
Since all these conflicts involve The US and oil, let's examine by far the worst. Go.
He's been trying to talk about West Africa for some time now and you won't even engage at the most basic level. Yes, you are an intellectual coward who relies on meme's and oversimplifications like VRWC to understand the world.pgardn has an "argument"
I don't have to ENGAGE with anybody.
Fuzzy is butthurt, too. Continue with sterile debates over trivial bull .
Of course you don't.
5.4 million people killed in by far the most serious conflict to humanity at present, and it's trivial because the US is not involved.
There is no oil, big company, Us is ed and un able line, so you can't process a really horrible disaster, it fits none of your major themes. Therefore it is of little consequence to you.
And I posited The Congo... perhaps?
Youre still stupid enough to think you are genous to Central European haplogroups using skin color as the marker?
So in review: the self styled German Nazi is looking to the race war of the Russians to bring about the race Armageddon he so hopes for. You then forgot about the discovery of DNA and gene expression and cried about the textbooks from before said discoveries. And finally because you see yourself as different in the same manner that breeds of dogs are different then that somehow justifies all your nonsense.
Throw out more random trivia from your worldview. It's an interesting study of delusion.
Who said anything about skin color? That's the biggest straw man ever, yeah race is really just skin deep. Never mind that you can determine someone's race by a simple DNA test.
America's foreign policy should always be to work towards people being able to exercise their god given rights.
Furthermore we should always fight to keeping dictators from getting a nuke. By force should always be on the table.
the U.S. government doesn't get to determine who's good or bad, who is allowed to do this or that etc. They've already abused that right too many times. They said assad was satan now they don't want him gone. They don't even know what the they're doing half the time. They should just off and mind their own business. U.S calling anyone out is the pot calling the kettle black at this point..they have no legitimacy anymore at this point. Everything they do turns to . Libya, Iraq, Syria, etc
And yet all of those pale in comparison to the Congo, a place that all super powers have basically avoided.
The US has more legitimacy than any country on the planet, like it or not. We are the big dog, good or bad.
No one cares because there is little geopolitical significance. Once Africa starts developing the U.S. will "bring democracy" to a few of those countries you watch.
Their chess plan genre rally consists of protecting US economic interests by any and all costs, under the poorly veiled guise of "protecting freedom and democracy." After ww2 people bought it because muh saving the world from nazis. As times goes on people of the world are seeing it as more and more ridiculous.
They can determine what haplogroup you belong to by genotype and then you apply a skin color to various haplogroups and wave your hands. I've heard your spiel about being northern european before. We've had this conversation before remember.
You can post your study again and I will read said study and show you where the geneity that is so prevalent in white Americans breaks down when looking at the minority genotypes. Last time you abandoned ship when I was laughing at you about inbreeding. We can do it again if you'd like: show us your study.
Thanks.
Boots.
Ya see, no one cares. You got that in common with the Nazi.
It's trivial. 5.4 million human beings dead is trivial.
Developing?
Boots says it's all about resources. The Congo has resources...
You guys have much in common as I have shown, discuss it amongst yourselves and I will take it all in.
It's about geopolitical power and control not directly harvesting the resources themselves. Global dollar hegemony
is way more effective than invading random countries and plundering their resources.
Then put in a puppet government in place and harvest?
The US has not tried. Explain?
The Congo is full of mineral resources, the Chinese have made attempts to just walk into Africa and South America.
And for Gods sake. You should be ashamed of Russia. Mineral wise the most prosperous region in THE WORLD !
WtF has happened? More of everything that they can't do ANYTHING with efficiently.
I am trying to rehabilitate you. I believe this is possible for fisherman who have kayaks. Think man.
Would take too long and too much capital to get Africa to the point where they can have a functioning economy and make use of themselves. If they ever eventually get there naturally well move in but we won't spend resources there over the Middle East. Middle east is geographically important as well as oil. Gotta dominate that region to dominate world trade.
Man an you'll never guess what I did last weekend- hung a ing drum on a roadrunner hunting sandbass. I thought I had a killer ing sandbass.
Simply put there's nothing there to harvest. Raw resources don't necessarily equate to wealth just look at russia. They wouldn't let us just have the resources without creating a PR nightmare. Soft power is more efficient, using might only when necessary. That's the USA foreign policy in a nuts
Russia has government that would never let you get away with what you are typing here. The reason you can actually present an argument about the U.S. is you are allowed to. And you can get to books articles and information of your choosing.
And I think what you call sand bass I call white bass. And the drum, a Gaspergoo. Common names are confusing. You are not from Texas methinks?
I'm a Texan born and raised. I call them sandbass and white bass but I've never heard that a drum called a gaspergoo. I've had those ers actually snap cheap ultra lights in the past and they'll hit anything.
Ive heard them called both. They are freshwater drum and are nasty.
Im really a sal er guy. But I will take any fishing. The Llano, when it gets flowing again, I love that river. Turned up rocks in the early spring and used helgumites ((dragonfly larvae) for bait. Caught more species than I have ever caught out of 1 river.
I almost killed myself fishing too late on that river. Got back to the launch point after 3 hrs in almost pure blackness of nite. All I could see was the white of the Rapids. Got really lucky, missed a number of really big trees and got hung up and taken down once. You get stuck up against a log with hundreds of gallons of water pouring over you, not fun.especially when you can't see a damn thing.
And I am born and raised here too. Which begs the question how the ... Nevermind.
how about india? excess labor force and cheap to hire...
pull out all production from china and see them crumble
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote