Iran agrees to nuclear framework

[boutons_deux]

I trust the Iranians version over Obama's. Obama is so desperate for any foreign policy legacy agreement that he will give the store away now for ANY agreement

how does the "Iranian version" differ from the the West's version?

what has the West given away here?

[CosmicCowboy]

You and I both know it is not random.

You stated that you 'tried to get your brother into rehab," that he was "estranged from the family," how he called the law on you and your guns in reprisal for what you had done and how you hid them from the cops, and that he "died of an overdose."

You told us all about your knee surgery and how you have been having to deal with it for months. You have demonstrated repeatedly with how you have poor impulse control.

How much weight did you put on? What did you do to 'try and get him into rehab?'

That is the thing, you are the blustering that isn't ashamed of anything yet you won't answer these questions. It's transparent.

Fuzzyboo is getting eerily stalkerish. He is really obsessing about my personal life.

[Warlord23]

You have reading difficulties? US version says they have to halt their program and THEN sanctions will be lifted. Iranian version is sanctions will be lifted and THEN they will modify but not stop their program.

Huge difference.

I realize you just like to bite my ankles and argue with me but it is what it is. It's right there in black and white. Iran says the deal the US announced isn't the deal at all.

Hate to break it to you, but the Washington Free Beacon is more of a conservative entertainment site than a news outlet. Both sides will try and sell this as a victory to their local audiences. The deal, if it breaks, will not crumble because they disagree on the sequence of actions.

You might think that Obama is either lying or incompetent, but are you saying that the UK, France, Germany, Russia and China are in the same boat as well?

[CosmicCowboy]

Hate to break it to you but direct quotes are direct quotes. Are you saying the Iranians didn't say that the deal the US announced isn't really the deal?

[boutons_deux]

isn't really the deal?

no, it's only a non-binding agreement, a framework, a step on the way to a binding "deal" targeted for 1 July.

The Congressional Repugs will continue to it up. It's what Repugs do, at all levels.

The West and the world appreciates you rightwingnuts' good-faith support in trying to stabilize just some what you Repugs ed up in the Middle East.

[Warlord23]

Spinning a story based on 3 or 4 tweets from the Iranian guy and adding statements like "lashed out at the Obama administration for lying", "accused the Obama administration of misleading the American people", "went on to push back against claims by Kerry" etc is exactly what the Free Beacon is known for. Those are not direct quotes at all. However, the story is written in a way where people will take them to be direct quotes.

There are several other real news outlets which have blogged / covered Zarif's press conference. Nothing like what the WFB makes it out to be.

[Warlord23]

Also have a look at the joint statement released by Zarif and the EU representative: http://eeas.europa.eu/statements-eea...0402_03_en.htm

[TeyshaBlue]

Damn...I thought you said Free Bacon.

[CosmicCowboy]

Oh. I understand now. It's a non binding agreement they don't agree on. Got it.

[ChumpDumper]

So which one is lying?

Neither from those statements.

I think you didn't read anything but conservativeblowhard.com for this one.

[The Reckoning]

Sadly the same thing can be said about our President.

In this case I suspect the Iranian version is closer to the truth.

how unamerican of you

[Infinite_limit]

My thoughts

- Civilization is progressing
- Obama hits another foreign policy home-run
- Jews are so bitter

[CosmicCowboy]

Guess we will know in a few months.

[Th'Pusher]

Whenever CC is too embarrassed to post his source, you know something's up.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Whenever CC is too embarrassed to post his source, you know something's up.

Yup just like when he dodges questions on topics he brought up.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Fuzzyboo is getting eerily stalkerish. He is really obsessing about my personal life.

You spammed us with the subject a few days ago looking for pity. Stalking implies I went looking when in fact you trumpeted for the whole world to read. You wanted pity for your injury and got pilled out and told us about how you were involved in what led up to your brother's death. That's on you, old man.

I am interested to know why you don't want to tell us what you did to your brother for him to seek reprisal.

[CosmicCowboy]

They were direct quotes and neither of you ankle biting es can deny it.

[FuzzyLumpkins]

Spinning a story based on 3 or 4 tweets from the Iranian guy and adding statements like "lashed out at the Obama administration for lying", "accused the Obama administration of misleading the American people", "went on to push back against claims by Kerry" etc is exactly what the Free Beacon is known for. Those are not direct quotes at all. However, the story is written in a way where people will take them to be direct quotes.

There are several other real news outlets which have blogged / covered Zarif's press conference. Nothing like what the WFB makes it out to be.

Also have a look at the joint statement released by Zarif and the EU representative: http://eeas.europa.eu/statements-eea...0402_03_en.htm

They were direct quotes and neither of you ankle biting es can deny it.

You going to respond to the rebuttal or are you just going with your normal lazy half-assed tripe, bro-killer?

[pgardn]

Positive development.

We will see.

[ChumpDumper]

They were direct quotes and neither of you ankle biting es can deny it.

And neither appeared to be lying.

What point is your blog trying to make?

the only discrepancy i could see might be the characterization and timing of the sanction lifting, but I haven't seen the actual language of the framework yet.

[CosmicCowboy]

You spammed us with the subject a few days ago looking for pity. Stalking implies I went looking when in fact you trumpeted for the whole world to read. You wanted pity for your injury and got pilled out and told us about how you were involved in what led up to your brother's death. That's on you, old man.

I am interested to know why you don't want to tell us what you did to your brother for him to seek reprisal.

I find your obsession with my personal life to be extremely comical.

Pathetic, but comical...

[CosmicCowboy]

And neither appeared to be lying.

What point is your blog trying to make?

the only discrepancy i could see might be the characterization and timing of the sanction lifting, but I haven't seen the actual language of the framework yet.

I read the whole summary put out by the state department and I read the Iranians response.

[ChumpDumper]

I read the whole summary put out by the state department and I read the Iranians response.

And?

[ElNono]

[Th'Pusher]

They were direct quotes and neither of you ankle biting es can deny it.

why did you feel the need to conceal your source?

What is it specifically that is supposed to concern us about these "direct quotes"?