Reply With Quote
A that Splits ed
btw, who is the girl in your sig?
A that Splits ed
BeisketBol
Oh, for sure..that era was absolutely embarrassing, tbh
I only call it "90s ball", because that's the glorified era by the old heads and Dad Killer cult..everybody acknowledges that the early 2000s was terrible
Imagine prime David Robinson in pace and space?Oh, for sure..that era was absolutely embarrassing, tbh
I only call it "90s ball", because that's the glorified era by the old heads and Dad Killer cult..everybody acknowledges that the early 2000s was terrible
Anthony Davis, as good as he is, is basically a poor man's David Robinson, and he's putting up historic numbers. With the spacing modern offenses create, David would be unstoppable facing up against opposing bigs. You could clog the lane back then and force David to post up (not his strength), but you couldn't do that today.
I agree, he would be even better today..it's a shame he isn't more appreciated in his own era..
Like a fish out of the water. In the days of Media they descended upon him like locust---to the point of your tank. Everything you own, even the salvation of Robinson from the tree of woe is because of your tank.
..Let us not rewrite history here, Hair. Robinson was scorned & ridiculed by Media...even some of you that dwell here this very Sabbath joined in his desecration. He was made an example in the finest traditions. You tanked and saved him from God only knows what ending.
We owe a few more events some skin. How 'bout the US Navy? Robinson had to put off San Antonio for two years, enabling the Spurs to draft Sean Elliott. And just when T-Long's Blazers were getting high 'n mighty, Elliott said, "Shhhhhhhh." And how about 29 other teams not calling Ginobili's name on draft day? And they have two chances to do it!
And then, then...
We picked Bird's pocket.
He is who is in the shadow of the Alamo &&& without sin in the squalid treatment of Robinson show their face.
Don't ing call me out without a /mention, .
I don't have sigs turned on. Who is it?
hardaway was one of the best bad shooters ever
yup. the only disadvantage of that run tbh
we'd slap them.
Its because his performance dropped off in the playoffs. Not quite as bad as Karl Malone, but enough to where he couldn't lead 60 win teams to a championship.
...he was always just one step ahead of the pitch fork mob from San Antonio. Christ, they, in association with Media treated Robinson like .
too much muscle in that videoAnybody know what sport this is, tbh? What the is this trash?!
The Knicks shoved their inside Miami at will during the 90s.
Don't worry, she's your type. In other words, 85 lbs and deaf
Yeah, I turned em on just to see what fatty you were fapping to. Not bad. 6/10
In 1997, MIA was 1st in DRTG, and NYK was 2nd.^^that's a pretty fair comparison, tbh..Knicks-Magic of today in their penultimate games of the season on a b2b to the top East contenders of the 90s outside of the Bulls
Also, NYK was in 25th ORTG and Miami was 12th.
One horrible offense and one average offense vs. elite defense, and the result is a low scoring game. It doesn't really take a genius to figure it out. Despite that, the quarter that you showed STILL ended up with a 25-20 score, that is 55 points, which is a full 40 points MORE than the ORL-NYK game I quoted.
Speaking of the ORL-NYK.
ORL
NYK is 29th in ORTG and 28th in DRTG, while ORL is 27th and 24th.
Horrible defense vs. horrible offense should result in an average scoring game, at the very least, especially considering that this ear is supposed to ahve some level of improvement over previous eras, and yet we ended up with 15 total points, which is the LOWEST in NBA history with the shot clock.
This year, an NBA team scores 99.9 points per game, hitting 44.9% of their FGs. It also has an average ORTG (also DRTG) of 105.6.Speaking of low scoring....
'90s basketball
In 1990, the numbers were 107, 47.6%, and 108.1
In 1997, which is the peak of ugly ball - 96.9, 45.5%, 106.7
Oops
TBE got some luv ITT, expect that line to be used 5 more times with no responses before being shelved.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions