Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 31
  1. #1
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    I haven't read this deep enough yet, but I am concerned about food labeling.

    Thoughts?

    https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-...bill/1599/text

  2. #2
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    BigAg/BigChem will (vehemently, expensively $10Ms attempt to) block it. As we saw in Oregon's labelling bill attacked by Grocery Marketing Assoc.

    BigAg/BigChem want the their kept secret.

    They know that (some) people want to know what's in their "industrial food-like" substances, so they want to keep people in the dark so BigAg/BigChem can continue ing up food for profit.

    The smarter people, like me, avoid that as much as possible, but EVERYTHING is tainted by the 100K untested chemicals polluting our country, land, water, air.

  3. #3
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Your opinion is no surprise.

    Have any facts?

  4. #4
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    Since there is no definition for organic, anything can basically be organic. I like this. Gives the consumers better information to make a decision that's best for them.

  5. #5
    Believe. Blizzardwizard's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    4,303
    Agree with above. People should know what's in their food. Simple as that.

  6. #6
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Your opinion is no surprise.

    Have any facts?
    With the FACTS of BigAg/BigCorp coporatocracy, the recent (and long) history is the infallible predictor of the near, and probably long, future.

  7. #7
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    Since there is no definition for organic, anything can basically be organic. I like this. Gives the consumers better information to make a decision that's best for them.
    BigFood/BigAg/BigChem buy the policies, regulations, laws that optimize their profits. Customers are to be kept in the dark, and pay, pay, pay.

  8. #8
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    With the FACTS of BigAg/BigCorp coporatocracy, the recent (and long) history is the infallible predictor of the near, and probably long, future.
    I know the pundits story, and find many of the things exaggerated.

    Still, I do believe we consumers deserve to have the facts to make our decisions on.

    Your opinion however well intended you think your motives are, will always be irrelevant to me. You have proven to be nothing but a shrill puppet of the left of the left.

    Maybe someday, you will grow up, and we can have an adult conversation with you.

  9. #9
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "I do believe we consumers deserve to have the facts to make our decisions on."

    who said I don't ?

    BigAG/BigFood/BigChem won't give the facts, period. They all make money on putting GMO into food, put x-icides INTO AND ONTO food, where it also gets into air, water, land, humans, foetuses, babies.

    And Repugs will block ANY regulations, esp ones that reduce corporate profits.



  10. #10
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    "I do believe we consumers deserve to have the facts to make our decisions on."

    who said I don't ?

    BigAG/BigFood/BigChem won't give the facts, period. They all make money on putting GMO into food, put x-icides INTO AND ONTO food, where it also gets into air, water, land, humans, foetuses, babies.

    And Repugs will block ANY regulations, esp ones that reduce corporate profits.


    See...

    You believe that without ever seeing the evidence.

    Did you look to see who sponsored HR 1599?

    Maybe you should seethe other bills he sponsors:

    https://www.congress.gov/member/mike-pompeo/P000602

  11. #11
    Still Hates Small Ball Spurminator's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Post Count
    37,751
    What are your concerns?

  12. #12
    Veteran Wild Cobra's Avatar
    My Team
    Portland Trailblazers
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Post Count
    43,117
    Shazbot...

    Do you ever look up relevant information, or do you simply rely of places like Common Dreams and Think Progress to tell you what to say?

  13. #13
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    See...

    You believe that without ever seeing the evidence.

    Did you look to see who sponsored HR 1599?

    Maybe you should seethe other bills he sponsors:

    https://www.congress.gov/member/mike-pompeo/P000602
    I don't care if some Repugs sponsored it, the tea bagger/Kock Bros suckers will block any new (federal) regulations.

  14. #14
    Garnett > Duncan sickdsm's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    4,098
    Could not find a good summary of bill but if it's requiring a labeling of GMO food it's pandering to the fear mongering without the science to back it up. I raised non-gmo crops last year and will continue to do so. I put more bad chemicals on that than my GMOs.

    Does it require all apples to be labeled gmo? If the bill is defining organic, is the label going to state that non-gmo feed was used to produce fertilizer?

    We have a thread about 20% of texans not being able to afford food. Wouldn't this raise the cost of food slightly?

    The more people demand non-gmo, the higher prices (and more subsidies) producers will benefit from.



    The farmer in me says have at it.

    The conservative in me says it is not right.

  15. #15
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    97,536
    "GMO food it's pandering to the fear mongering without the science to back it up"

    there's plenty of science by GMO companies SUPPRESSED because of the negative outcomes, and plenty of GMO science from 3rd parties showing the same.

    "
    Wouldn't this raise the cost of food slightly?"

    the price of some printing on the label costs essentially nothing. The risk to their profits is people reading the labels and not buying and/or people suing for false labelling.



  16. #16
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,141
    Not to mention that non GMO requires about 5 times the petroleum products to produce with the related CO2 and other aerosol byproducts of combustion. Tractors don't have pollution control devices on them.

  17. #17
    Garnett > Duncan sickdsm's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    4,098
    Not to mention that non GMO requires about 5 times the petroleum products to produce with the related CO2 and other aerosol byproducts of combustion. Tractors don't have pollution control devices on them.
    Yes they do. One of mine uses DEF. They were delayed in meeting EPA requirements. Those requirements are the reason Caterpillar sold off their Ag line. I believe they might be out of the semi business too. Lots of Ag diesels are now made overseas.

    Most organic farmers I know use old equipment that does not have much for emission equip.

  18. #18
    Garnett > Duncan sickdsm's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    4,098
    "GMO food it's pandering to the fear mongering without the science to back it up"

    there's plenty of science by GMO companies SUPPRESSED because of the negative outcomes, and plenty of GMO science from 3rd parties showing the same.

    "
    Wouldn't this raise the cost of food slightly?"

    the price of some printing on the label costs essentially nothing. The risk to their profits is people reading the labels and not buying and/or people suing for false labelling.



    You really believe it's just the cost of the ink? There will be over site within the company and the govt I'd imagine. Along with fees. If people choose not buy, it's not like they go without. The more organic/non gmo people buy results in higher cost. The reason I grow non-gmo is because of the premium. The premium is needed because of the lower yield on average. Organic is more so.

    Lower yields= higher costs.

    Please eat more non-gmo. My premium last year on soybeans (sprayed with nasty chemicals including roundup) resulted in almost a 2/3s better price.

  19. #19
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,141
    Yes they do. One of mine uses DEF. They were delayed in meeting EPA requirements. Those requirements are the reason Caterpillar sold off their Ag line. I believe they might be out of the semi business too. Lots of Ag diesels are now made overseas.

    Most organic farmers I know use old equipment that does not have much for emission equip.
    Thanks for the info...hadn't looked at new tractors in the last few years and didn't realize they had already gone to tier 4. The argument still stands that non GMO farming is much more labor and tractor hours intensive.

  20. #20
    Mr. John Wayne CosmicCowboy's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    44,141
    You really believe it's just the cost of the ink? There will be over site within the company and the govt I'd imagine. Along with fees. If people choose not buy, it's not like they go without. The more organic/non gmo people buy results in higher cost. The reason I grow non-gmo is because of the premium. The premium is needed because of the lower yield on average. Organic is more so.

    Lower yields= higher costs.

    Please eat more non-gmo. My premium last year on soybeans (sprayed with nasty chemicals including roundup) resulted in almost a 2/3s better price.
    OK I gotta ask...unlike Boo and Fuzzyboo I understand the how and why of GMO modified seed...so how are you using roundup on your non GMO soybeans?

  21. #21
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    It amazes me the amount of people that believe organic crops are somehow pesticide/chemical free. I get a kick out of selling organic avocados for 12.00-20.00 more a case than conventional avocados when none of the chemicals sprayed penetrate the skin of either. I'm all for certain organic crops but there are a lot of them out there that are a complete scam, avocados being one of them. But as long as the Whole Foods of the world keep paying the premium I've got no problem pushing them.

  22. #22
    No darkness Cry Havoc's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    33,683
    I have an acquired distaste for Monsanto.

    However, when guys with doctorates in agriculture and nutrition say that GMOs are (generally speaking) not harmful to eat, I'm inclined to believe them.

  23. #23
    Garnett > Duncan sickdsm's Avatar
    My Team
    Minnesota T'Wolves
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Post Count
    4,098
    OK I gotta ask...unlike Boo and Fuzzyboo I understand the how and why of GMO modified seed...so how are you using roundup on your non GMO soybeans?
    About 3 weeks before harvest roundup kills it off so it dries down uniformly. Being they were worth more, I was able to harvest them at exactly the right moisture. Typically soybeans will dry down but the stalks remain very wet and tough to combine. If you wait for the stalks to dry down the beans are too dry.

    I don't do that to my roundup beans being as they aren't worth as much, obviously i would have to use something other than roundup.

    It's more common to do that on wheat.

  24. #24
    Rising above the Fray spursncowboys's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Post Count
    7,669
    It amazes me the amount of people that believe organic crops are somehow pesticide/chemical free. I get a kick out of selling organic avocados for 12.00-20.00 more a case than conventional avocados when none of the chemicals sprayed penetrate the skin of either. I'm all for certain organic crops but there are a lot of them out there that are a complete scam, avocados being one of them. But as long as the Whole Foods of the world keep paying the premium I've got no problem pushing them.
    I was surprised how every company has their own version of what "organic" means.

  25. #25
    ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ TheSanityAnnex's Avatar
    My Team
    Sacramento Kings
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Post Count
    21,376
    I have an acquired distaste for Monsanto.

    However, when guys with doctorates in agriculture and nutrition say that GMOs are (generally speaking) not harmful to eat, I'm inclined to believe them.
    Not directed at you but every fruit and vegetable we consume these days has been modified by farmers/scientists to some degree. Most wild fruits taste like .

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •