Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 47 of 47
  1. #26
    Veteran Sean Cagney's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Post Count
    13,402
    Play to win, and let the cards fall as they will.
    Damn right. Spurs want that higher seed and will gun for it.

  2. #27
    Veteran K...'s Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Post Count
    8,229
    Dallas will be just as easy as Portland. Instead of no names you get old names. Better warm up team too. I don't care about GSW early or late. There is no difference. But being five and having to play the 2,3 winner on the road would suck. Imagine if we come out of GSW tired or injured. We would definitely want home court

  3. #28
    Veteran hater's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Post Count
    74,105
    I'd like to see Pop rest his starters against NO and see the Blazers in the first round. This Blazers team is so shorthanded the Spurs should be able to sweep them and maybe even get some extra rest days before playing Golden State.

    The Spurs would not have HCA against GS anyway, and that's the only team they may really need it against.
    Bingo

  4. #29
    "We'll do it this time" Bartleby's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    2,678
    Dumb asses if the Spurs losses the last game they will end up number 6 if houston win their last game! Last time i checked number 6 plays number 3 not number 4 which is portland!
    Memphis is going to be the sixth seed.

  5. #30
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    I don't believe in playing for positioning in order to play a weaker team..

  6. #31
    "We'll do it this time" Bartleby's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    2,678
    I don't believe in playing for positioning in order to play a weaker team..
    I don't want to see a repeat of the last regular season game of 2011.

  7. #32
    selbstverständlich Agloco's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Post Count
    9,019
    Seeding doesn't matter as much as being opposite the Clippers and Warriors.

  8. #33
    Veteran spurs10's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    10,797
    Too bad..Pelicans.

  9. #34
    Pronouns: Your/Dad TheGreatYacht's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    36,459
    As someone before me said, Dallas is a perfect warm-up team. You don't want the Spurs to sweep Portland, go on a 15+ win streak, and then get hit hard and get shook... 2012

    Dallas brought out the best in the Spurs and prepared them for the rest of the way.

  10. #35
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Post Count
    5,544
    Memphis is going to be the sixth seed.
    Only if they fall to the Pacers. Which is very possible considering they'll be fighting for their lives.

  11. #36
    PINOY BOHOLANO#21's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Post Count
    529
    Memphis is going to be the sixth seed.
    I guess you're one of them dummy too, spurs losses last game and memphis wins they will end up tied at 55-27...memphis owns tie breaker with more conference win...spurs number 6 and plays clippers in first round. Spurs win automatic number 2 regardless of what happen to other teams game.

  12. #37
    "We'll do it this time" Bartleby's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Post Count
    2,678
    I guess you're one of them dummy too, spurs losses last game and memphis wins they will end up tied at 55-27...memphis owns tie breaker with more conference win...spurs number 6 and plays clippers in first round. Spurs win automatic number 2 regardless of what happen to other teams game.
    Yeah, I get all that, but I don't think Memphis is going to win that game against Indy.

  13. #38
    The 6th is coming... will_spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,969
    The only upside to playing GSW early is that they might pick up steam as they go through the first 2 rounds, which usually isn't the case for a team of playoffs virgins. That's rather what you could expect from veterans such as 2014 Spurs...

    On the other end the upside to playing GSW as late as possible is actually manifold: a) they could have been eliminated already, obviously; b) they might be tired, especially if series go to 7 physical games (a series against Houston or Clippers could do that); c) they might start losing confidence as they realize the playoffs are harder than the regular season; d) they might be crushed by the pressure of playing in an advanced round (especially the WCF); and e) one of their key players could get injured.

  14. #39
    Slam Duncan Kidd K's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    4,634
    Uh, why would you want the 5 seed? The first round isn't going to be that ing hard anyway since ts the Mavs; a team playing .500 ball lately. Why're you pussies shooting for 2nd round aspirations? Wanting an easier first round in exchange for a tier 2nd round? Dumb.

  15. #40
    Believe. Malik Hairston's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    11,370
    Uh, why would you want the 5 seed? The first round isn't going to be that ing hard anyway since ts the Mavs; a team playing .500 ball lately. Why're you pussies shooting for 2nd round aspirations? Wanting an easier first round in exchange for a tier 2nd round? Dumb.
    How is that dumb? The Spurs are an old team, you could easily argue that they should take the inevitable Warriors matchup in the 2nd round, rather than having the wear&tear of a 2nd round, adding mileage to Duncan/Ginobili/Parker, see: 2008 playoffs vs. New Orleans..

    The only reason to avoid the Warriors is out of hope that somebody else can beat them, but realistically, the Clippers are the only other team that has even a puncher's chance against them..

    Being eliminated in the 2nd round, rather than the 3rd round doesn't get you anything..there's no prize for 2nd place..

  16. #41
    Believe. Malik Hairston's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    11,370
    The only upside to playing GSW early is that they might pick up steam as they go through the first 2 rounds, which usually isn't the case for a team of playoffs virgins. That's rather what you could expect from veterans such as 2014 Spurs...

    On the other end the upside to playing GSW as late as possible is actually manifold: a) they could have been eliminated already, obviously; b) they might be tired, especially if series go to 7 physical games (a series against Houston or Clippers could do that); c) they might start losing confidence as they realize the playoffs are harder than the regular season; d) they might be crushed by the pressure of playing in an advanced round (especially the WCF); and e) one of their key players could get injured.
    That's not the only upside, the Spurs are an old team that has played into June in 2 consecutive seasons, they have a ton of mileage..getting the Warriors earlier would help negate that..

    Also, a 7-game series is more likely for the Spurs in the 2nd round(Clippers or Rockets) than it is for the Warriors(Grizzlies or Blazers)..

    2008 series vs. New Orleans all over again, potentially

  17. #42
    Slam Duncan Kidd K's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Post Count
    4,634
    How is that dumb? The Spurs are an old team, you could easily argue that they should take the inevitable Warriors matchup in the 2nd round, rather than having the wear&tear of a 2nd round, adding mileage to Duncan/Ginobili/Parker, see: 2008 playoffs vs. New Orleans..

    The only reason to avoid the Warriors is out of hope that somebody else can beat them, but realistically, the Clippers are the only other team that has even a puncher's chance against them..

    Being eliminated in the 2nd round, rather than the 3rd round doesn't get you anything..there's no prize for 2nd place..
    Who gives a if they're old? They won the le last year, so age isn't a factor. Even if it were and somehow it meant they'd get worse the further they got as you're insinuating, they would lose eventually anyway since they'd have 4 rounds to play through. Your logic is poor on that point. As for 2008, SA beat NO and Manu got injured. The "what if?" game is pointless because "what if?" it all played out the same anyway? Yeah, just as likely. Severely injured key player = you don't win le.

    It has nothing to do with the Warriors and everything to do with having HCA in more series. Why play the Warriors in the 2nd round rather than 3rd for no reason, only to play without HCA for all 4 rounds potentially instead of just 2/4 or 1/4? ty idea dude.

    It seems you're on the Warriors' bandwagon if you think it's assured they'll beat SA. Good luck with that.

  18. #43
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Ya, I've been saying that for weeks, would rather get 5th and play vs. GS earlier, tbh..

    Batum and especially Afflalo are pretty bad players nowadays, but still, no depth and gimmick team..
    I wouldn't mind 5th.. but id rather avoid GS to the WCF.. i think the Spurs beat them in a 7 game series.. but it will be a monster series similar to the Hornets series in 2008.. don't want them to blow their load to beat GS then be fatigued with still the WCF and Finals to go.. think if you can get to the WCF unscathed (which i think they should) then get through GS and into the Finals.. being there will give them the final push to win it all..

    JMO.

  19. #44
    ......................... mystargtr34's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Post Count
    10,073
    Although i can see the argument of getting GS before you get too fatigued and using that series win to get your second wind and propel you to the 'ship..

    I guess lets just let the chips fall where they may as long as you avoid 6th.

  20. #45
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Post Count
    14,854
    I wouldn't mind 5th.. but id rather avoid GS to the WCF.. i think the Spurs beat them in a 7 game series.. but it will be a monster series similar to the Hornets series in 2008.. don't want them to blow their load to beat GS then be fatigued with still the WCF and Finals to go.. think if you can get to the WCF unscathed (which i think they should) then get through GS and into the Finals.. being there will give them the final push to win it all..

    JMO.
    Agreed. Harlem's thinking isn't necessarily flawed, but it does seem to ignore that, if they got through the Warriors, they wouldn't have home court against the Clippers/Rockets in the Conference Finals. Obviously, they could beat either without it, but I'd rather have it over either (and it'll more than likely be the Clippers) in the Conference-Semis and take my chances with the Warriors in the Conference Finals.

    This is all semantics anyway, since either way it's impossible to know the level of stamina they'll have at each point and that along with health is going to decide this. This isn't a question of who's best is best.

  21. #46
    Veteran Beaverfuzz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    8,389
    I'll take the 2nd/3rd seed but would rather have the 5th. Beat Portland and GS, beat anyone else in their way.

  22. #47
    Out with the old... Obstructed_View's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Post Count
    41,715
    Glad Batum's knee injury wasn't more serious, but how the does someone get a knee contusion without contact? I didn't see his knee hit anything in the replays. Was I just getting the wrong angle?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •