Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 70 of 70
  1. #51
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    He's right bb, his source is nba.com, and it's been that way for years.
    LOL the gots at NBA.com still have the old rules posted

    http://www.nba.com/news/features/playoff.tiebreakers/

  2. #52
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    Glad to see I was wrong, as homecourt could help a lot against the Clippers.

  3. #53
    Indubitable Super Saiyan Cloud786's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Post Count
    741
    It's true, but I'm not sure Portland would have HCA in case of a tie simply by virtue of being a division winner. Maybe.
    Based on the rules, Portland would have HCA over the 5th seed if their records were identical, regardless of the season series or division records or anything like that. It would go straight to the division winner when records are tied.

  4. #54
    The 6th is coming... will_spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,969
    LOL the gots at NBA.com still have the old rules posted

    http://www.nba.com/news/features/playoff.tiebreakers/
    I have to say I first stumbled upon that age a couple of weeks ago when I was researching the Spurs seeding scenarios. However the "Posted Aug 25 2010" part made me think that this might not be valid any longer

    BTW I was wondering where you got your copy/paste from a few posts ago when you listed the rules!

  5. #55
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    LOL the gots at NBA.com still have the old rules posted

    http://www.nba.com/news/features/playoff.tiebreakers/
    I don't want to beat a dead horse because we go through this every season, but what changes are not reflected in the rules in your link.

  6. #56
    Klaw apalisoc_9's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Post Count
    24,488
    I don't want to beat a dead horse because we go through this every season, but what changes are not reflected in the rules in your link.
    looks like it xhanged

    His link doesn't have division winner as basis for two teams tied.

  7. #57
    Veteran SpursFan86's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Post Count
    5,159
    Just when we thought we had finally figured out all the scenarios and for the playoffs.. baseline bum comes in here and tries throwing everyone off

  8. #58
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    looks like it xhanged

    His link doesn't have division winner as basis for two teams tied.
    It does. It's number 1 under "Tiebreaker basis"

  9. #59
    5 is real faggy! Mikeanaro's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Post Count
    9,312
    Glad to see I was wrong, as homecourt could help a lot against the Clippers.
    An apology would be better

  10. #60
    俺はまんこが大好きなんだよ baseline bum's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Post Count
    97,883
    It does. It's number 1 under "Tiebreaker basis"
    It's not listed in the a. Two Teams Tied section referenced for determining homecourt in section d of the link I posted. It is referenced in the same section of the new link.

  11. #61
    The 6th is coming... will_spurs's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Post Count
    3,969
    It's not listed in the a. Two Teams Tied section referenced for determining homecourt in section d of the link I posted. It is referenced in the same section of the new link.
    Your link is "news", i.e. something that is subject to change (and indeed your link is just the announcement of how things would be for the 2010 playoffs). My link is static and current.

  12. #62
    Veteran Mel_13's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Post Count
    14,367
    It's not listed in the a. Two Teams Tied section referenced for determining homecourt in section d of the link I posted. It is referenced in the same section of the new link.

    If you read the two paragraphs directly above "Two Teams Tied", you'll see why it doesn't. The division winner tiebreaker only applies in the first section at the top for seeding the first through fourth seeds. The second section is used to determine division winners and then to break ties in seeds 5-8.

    The change was made after the teams with the two best records, Spurs and Mavs, met in the WCSF in 2006. Now the teams with best two records are always seeded 1 and 2.
    Last edited by Mel_13; 04-14-2015 at 04:07 PM.

  13. #63
    Veteran Big Empty's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Post Count
    2,314
    If we lose against the prlicans then what

  14. #64
    Believe.
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Post Count
    19,014
    Why don't any of you ers know what tie means?

  15. #65
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Post Count
    9,423
    all this confusion...this is probably the closest western conference seeding of all time

  16. #66
    Veteran Beaverfuzz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    8,389
    Why don't any of you ers know what tie means?
    you got. Tie goes to the runner, everyone knows that.

  17. #67
    Believe. Malik Hairston's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    11,370
    I want that 5 seed, tbh..unfortunately, Pacers-Grizzlies is at 9:30 PM, though, so it would be impossible for the Spurs to strategically tank..

  18. #68
    Veteran Beaverfuzz's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Post Count
    8,389
    I want that 5 seed, tbh..unfortunately, Pacers-Grizzlies is at 9:30 PM, though, so it would be impossible for the Spurs to strategically tank..
    My , I'd rather have the 5th seed too but will take the 2nd seed.

  19. #69
    Believe. Malik Hairston's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Post Count
    11,370
    Of course I'm cool with the 2nd seed..

    Best alternative is if the Suns miraculously win tonight, I'd love to see the Clippers in the 5 spot..hopefully the ty Morris Twins or Blesdoe get hot tonight..

  20. #70
    Veteran
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Post Count
    6,778
    Looks like the Pelcans need to beat us to make the playoffs, and we need to win for the #2 seed. Gonna be a good game with two teams playing really hard for playoff spots.
    Should be good practice for the playoffs. Need to be able to win on the road in the playoffs.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •