Reply With Quote
Soviets lost 14500 to a bunch of ragheads in afghanistan. That's more than 3x America suffered in that same period
Get rekt got
All those soviet lives and the s I gave.Pull that crack pipe out of your mouth got, that makes no sense.You're just upset due to America's insignificance in the greatest war the world has ever seen. WWII started in 1939, and ended 1945, America entered the war in Europe in June 1944
.
Soviets lost 14500 to a bunch of ragheads in afghanistan. That's more than 3x America suffered in that same period
Get rekt got
Nope, ignorant got, look again.
Just facts scrah, Soviet Russia won the greatest war in history, while pussy Americans hid behind the Atlantic through majority of the said conflict.
I'm talking about winning the greatest war in history, and you're boasting about a few less dead in some sideshow war in Afganistan no one gives a about.
off baseline everyone knows you're full of
Again, thanks to American funding/supplies.
Dem Stinger Missiles doe....Soviet helicopters started falling out of the sky the next day.
Geezer?Actually, I already refuted your pathetic and re ed contentions. Let me explain for the third time, maybe this time your addled senile geezer brain will comprehend these simple concepts. Didn't you claim that the reason they could move those troops is because the Japs were occupied fighting Americans? I just refuted this re ed claim, by pointing out that the order to recall the troops from Siberia and Far East, came six months before the war between the Japs and Americans broke out, so that had no impact whatsoever on the deployment of Siberian reserves, because there was no ing war between Japs and Americans at the time the order was sent.
Let me explain once again. The Japanese and Russians had contentious conflicts well before WWII for parts of Asia. The Japanese were screwing around there. This was why Russia had so many troops in the "West". When the Japanese signed on with the Nazis, it was a sure bet they would be facing the US and the Japanese decided to start it early. But you assume that Pearl was the beginning of the notion for the major powers? It was not.
Now. The troops were fully gone because the Japanese were tied up with the Americans. If the Japanese had not signed up with the Nazis, they would have been free to move well into Russia and China which is why the troops were there in the first place. They had already had go rounds in Asia which you conveniently fail to mention.
So yes, being engaged with the Americans allowed the whole of the Siberian group to be moved. When Japan signed on with the Nazis, it was clearer the Russians might be given a break they badly needed. Pearl sealed the deal. So again tell me what would have happened to Russia if the US HAD NOT BEEN INVOLVED. What would Japan, at the height of its Imperialism, done? They had ALREADY been messing around there, they had already been russian/Japanese conflicts before WWII. Which is why there were troops in Siberia. You have to see this. Or maybe you are as twisted as Stalin and Hotler and nothing makes sense.
Last edited by pgardn; 04-16-2015 at 10:47 PM.
Pull that crack pipe out of your mouth got, that makes no sense.
.
This guy is obviously a troll. He himself said Russian didn't even have to contend with Japan during WWII. US did. US had to fight in Alaska, Mexico, South American, North Africa, South Pacific, All of the Continental Europe including Scandinavia. Russia just had to fight, in well, Russia.
And those supplies were sent before the US even entered the war dumbass. Russia and UK were the ONLY ALLIES not under or fully under Nazi occupation after 1939. Australia was the only Ally in the South Pacific and Japan plan an assault on them as well but we halted their advancement in the Naval Battle at the Solomon Islands and completely stopped them after winning Guadalcanal.
Wow, I love revisionist history for the fact that it proves my point that people are in morons nowadays.
Soviets lost the Cold War to the Americans. And Stalin is even hated by most Russians nowadays. You worship a man that killed over 20 mil on your people in concentration and work camps. I have more respect for people that worship Hitler, because at least he tried to unify his country in his own distorted way. Germans had every reason to be pissed with the rest of Europe after getting low blown by them with the Treaty of Versailles, that basically put them in almost 3rd world country status economically.
Stalin just cared about himself and killed anyone who got in his way. He destroy all the good that Lenin try to accomplish from the revolution in the first place.
Last edited by Cowboys_Wear_Spurs; 04-17-2015 at 09:29 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
