The ST double standard ...

[Mikeanaro]

bad game but who on the spurs played better? Parker with his 4-11 shooting, 2 turnovers and 1 assist? 1 ASSIST FROM OUR STARTING PG. Tim had 4 assist, Kawhi had 3, Boris had 5, and Manu had 6. our starting PG had 1. Just 1. Uno for our spanish speaking audience.

UNO!? UNITO!???
elite PG
Pork s trying to blame the moon
he was dead from the start, even doctors can confirm that.
lost too many steps.
Defense? only if its a ham sandwich.

[dabom]

they're delusional like kobe fans, tbh. some of these dudes have to have mental health problems.

[SASdynasty!]

I'm talking about actual magazine covers, not "commemorative editions."



Enrique shoved off to the side, taking up the least amount of space on the cover



Manu and Bowen listed ahead of Enrique in the picture caption
Enrique featured equally as prominently as Fab Oberto

Lol, if you're going to use your double standards, at least don't do it in the same post. Hahahaha wow.

[TheGreatYacht]

My Dynasty, why'd you have to do this

[apalisoc_9]

UNO!? UNITO!???
elite PG
Pork s trying to blame the moon
he was dead from the start, even doctors can confirm that.
lost too many steps.
Defense? only if its a ham sandwich.

[Keepin' it real]

nobody is capable anymore to have a fair statement or discussion about anything

10,000 trolls and no moderators ... the results are inevitable

[RD2191]

UNO!? UNITO!???
elite PG
Pork s trying to blame the moon
he was dead from the start, even doctors can confirm that.
lost too many steps.
Defense? only if its a ham sandwich.

[Brazil]

Is that all you got because it isn't helping your case at all. Parker was the worst player on the team last night.

this is exactly what you about when somebody was using raw stat for defending Parker

make up your mind... raw stat are useful or not ? when Parker was with 18 pts shooting 7/12 you would use the +/- but this is not useful anymore ? sorry for highlighting your contradictions brah

[Clipper Nation]

Here's one better for you:

Big ing whoop, Andrea Bargnani made the cover that year too:

[taps]

A de facto Parker house thread: Playoffs Edition could be useful.

[wildbill2u]

Anyone? Anyone?

I'd like to know what he was doing between the assist at the 11:12 mark and the free throws at 4:28. We sure could have used some offense from our max player during those 7 minutes. Just askin'

But I don't blame him for the loss. It's a team game and we had a bunch of players who could have played better.

I want to believe that all of them will come back and play like champions.

[jag]

This Parker vs Kawhi stuff is really odd. There are 4-5 posters who think they're dropping truth bombs by pointing out Tony's poor performances. As if everyone else can't see it as well. If they weren't re ed, they'd realize no one is defending Tony's poor play. People are just tired of the played out shtick.

There's no point in arguing with these people while bringing actual basketball takes, because they aren't concerned with the play or the results. They root for one or two players to do well, while also rooting against one or two players, then they take to the forums and run shtick.

This is the type of nonsense people are trying to debate:

It didn't really matter that Kawhi held the ball too long or had bad passes while double teamed.

you're not going to convince these re s of anything. They want attention and you're giving it to them.

[RD2191]

Plus minus

7

Kawhi Leonard, SF

SA

64

31.8

3.51

4.92

8.43

13.77

443

Tony Parker, PG

SA

68

28.7

0.25

-3.66

-3.41

-1.29

[SASdynasty!]

Big ing whoop, Andrea Bargnani made the cover that year too:

You said Parker never made covers. Just helping you out. You know, before you make statements, you should at least do a quick Google search to confirm that the people can't call BS in less than 5 seconds.

[jag]

Kawhi is better than Tony. Who knew? Solid take

[TheGreatYacht]

Plus Minus

Belinelli +5

CancerJo -18

Matrix -21

[RD2191]

There really is nothing to debate. "Raw stats" or metrics. Kawhi is far superior in both.

[dabom]

Plus Minus

Belinelli +5

CancerJo -18

Matrix -21

Joe you trying to hard again. Pitty reply since everyone has ignored you. Remember when you actually riled people up. Not anymore.

[SASdynasty!]

This Parker vs Kawhi stuff is really odd. There are 4-5 posters who think they're dropping truth bombs by pointing out Tony's poor performances. As if everyone else can't see it as well. If they weren't re ed, they'd realize no one is defending Tony's poor play. People are just tired of the played out shtick.

There's no point in arguing with these people while bringing actual basketball takes, because they aren't concerned with the play or the results. They root for one or two players to do well, while also rooting against one or two players, then they take to the forums and run shtick.

This is the type of nonsense people are trying to debate:


you're not going to convince these re s of anything. They want attention and you're giving it to them.

I always realized they were trolls, but hadn't been on this thread long enough to know that Rob doesn't think he's a good poster or that he knows basketaball (that's actually coming directly from him). I assumed those were given assumptions of a basketball forum. Now I know.

[Clipper Nation]

You said Parker never made covers. Just helping you out. You know, before you make statements, you should at least do a quick Google search to confirm that the people can't call BS in less than 5 seconds.

I said he never got his own magazine covers. You immediately deflected to "commemorative editions" and video game covers. Maybe if you'd wipe Enrique's off your screen, you'd be able to read what people are actually saying better.

[SASdynasty!]

There really is nothing to debate. "Raw stats" or metrics. Kawhi is far superior in both.

I've got an exercise for you...it's going to be difficult. Remember you said this tomorrow and from now on use it as your criteria.

[HI-FI]

well least for $45 million we'll get some good memes.

[Mikeanaro]

This thread is hot, almost like a game thread.
Parker looks like 2004 Shaq, he cant have 25 points every night anymore I know all the injuries, Jones fracture ACL torn shoulder achilles tendonitis but he keeps trying too hard almost forgetting there is a team playing with him and a clock running, Pop deserves some blame too we have 2 decent options as backup PG.

[jag]

I always realized they were trolls, but hadn't been on this thread long enough to know that Rob doesn't think he's a good poster or that he knows basketaball (that's actually coming directly from him). I assumed those were given assumptions of a basketball forum. Now I know.

His goal is to troll people and get attention. And he hooks a lot of posters, making them look stupid in the process.

[FkLA]

dude, go back you will see I answered you. On game 1, Kawhi had a higher usage than Parker, you like it or not. And again if he cannot handle double teams his usage is gonna plummet and you will blame Parker for that...

lol no that was to my previous post

You're trying to use FGAs and FTs to claim the offense was more Kawhi centric than Rique centric. That's stupid. It's easier for a physical specimen to get his shot off than a fat, over the hill PG...but that doesn't necessarily mean the fat, over the hill PG didn't have the ball in his hands the majority of the time.