because you would rather the Spurs lose than have them win with Parker succeeding. I don't care one iota who succeeds on the Spurs team, be it Parker or Kawhi, or Duncan.
I just want the Spurs to win.
You (and your kind) just want Parker to fail.
Who the said I want parker to fail got?
Since when that cancer is the pinnacle of basketball?
Stupid is the one who couldnt see Spurs were Tim&Manu, french servant was a scrub.
I want parker to get 10 FMVP and 10 MVPs but thats not how works,
I understood long time ago enrique was done. We needed to move away from it or make some adjustments.
These loses are a direct result of that. I'm not a ing player fan slurper sheep. I voice my educated opinion.
If you don't like it you can GTFO!!!
says who? when did i say that? when have i ever ted on parker when he has a good game? you're ing delusional
You're wrong. If the Spurs win I'd love it, with Parker as FMVP or even Ayres. 6th will be great, I don't give a about names in the Finals.
But OP and the rest of the guys in this thread act like the Spurs can win without Kawhi playing at high level, and that's really stupid.
The Spurs need more of Kawhi than any other player on the team in playoffs but sadly Pop and our guards don't realize that.
You're a moron.
I openly don't want Enrique to win FMVP but if given a choice between that or the Spurs not winning it all, then obviously I'd rather he win it and we get #6.
All kinds of player fans do to defend TP.
That long range jumper tho. Hey it worked in 2007.
I'd prefer Bonner to win FMVP over Errors. It'd be payback for all the grief I've posted about Bonner. Really, though, that Parker contract is HORRIFIC. And Parker winning another FMVP would just encourage him to dribble even more. Besides that wouldn't be happening playing against Kyrie or Rose.
You're wrong again. I don't want to talk about him because is wasted time, his game is aging and Pop can't admit it and make the best move for the team over Tony's centric offense.
But if you ask me now...I'm getting tired of his when he can't recognize a favorable matchup like Rivers on Kawhi, or can't pass the ball to the open man.
I always thought he's a great, amazing scorer, but an elite PG is the primary facilitator on offense for his teammates, too.
Because his style of play, or court vision issues or lack of playmaker skills, whatever, but he didn't seem that player in this and last playoffs.
At same point of their careers, HoF PGs made the development of his young teammates over looking for his own shot, a priority.
We didn't see that with Tony and will never see with him.
If we won le #6 I wouldn't give a if the coyote won mvp of the finals
Now this is flat out false. The forum was fine about Tony Parker. The issue was apo and his joke a thon ramming the issue on a daily basis, then the got brothers hammering it in.The "player-fan" shtick started because most of the forum couldn't accept that Tony Parker was finished..it's strange to call out those posters when it's clear that they were correct, all along..
Y'all set the maximimal position to Parker is the devil, while the truth was injury, age, and inconsistency. If we didn't have apos comedy career this would have been a better discussion. If your short bus didn't have immature dunces and emotionally wounded martyrs we could have laughed at apos jokes.
Instead it was maximilst position, plus fanatical enforcement. Much like the state of Texas legislature or upcoming republican primary the conversation is skewed by the extremist.
It was very hard to say, Parker sucks but he's still useful, which was true until he got hurt again. We all ed up. No one called "Parker bad, Parker adequate Parker bad" although Harlem came close on warning us Parker was coming back to health against weak teams.
fans who support veteran players vs emotionally needy man children who jerk of together.your doing it now, stop it it's grossAll kinds of player fans do to defend TP.
That long range jumper tho. Hey it worked in 2007.
This is fair.Maybe you did call it. But can you politely tell us how you'd move the team away from Tony Parker? No extension? Sorry your not the gm. Proceed anyway.
Weak fan fiction.
you're a got
Yup, the Spurs success in the 2000s was all about Duncan and Manu. Parker was disappointing back then too. Low efficiency chucker that would routinely take more shots than prime Duncan and prime Manu. I made a post that confirmed that the Spurs were a Big Two back then a week ago:
http://www.spurstalk.com/forums/show...=1#post7946636
Agreed, facts are facts, then there is opinions and perceptions
Those 2 were the bosses.
A Parker "player fan" is no worse/better than a Kawhi "player fan"....
They all should die in a grease fire.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
