So he's wrong and you know better right?
Both videos totally tear your fairy tale apart....totally~! Why not drop that silliness guy and go with how things really are?
So he's wrong and you know better right?
he's just not very good at biology.
probably explains his stance on evolution
why would that i fear that video? did you know the guy talking believes that Humans are the result of alien intervention, believes that bigfoot exists, and believes that he found the remains of an alien-human hybrid?
did you know that? i bet you didn't, otherwise you wouldn't post his lecture
So all these guys are wrong and you know better, right?
i believe that the 99% of biologists/scientists are right, and the 1% who's work is never peer reviewed are probably wrong.
you can keep posting examples of the 1%... and i'll keep posting examples of the small percentage of hail mary plays that worked
Ok I will...
you didnt watch this video. if you did, you wouldn't post it. there was no "proof" or "debunking" of evolution in the video. it was a waste of time.
some video of guys in the 1980's having a conversation isn't adding to our discussion
Dude, I watch all these videos or have ok? That was about the debate, as you saw they disagreed.
How about...
Dude, you know how many times this subject has been argued? How come I know so many of these videos, could it be I've shown them before?
What is the name of the guy in the video?
I don't believe you.
Who is the guy in this video?
They can't even agree among themselves.
Only a fool ignores....
gnore the Contradictions
The theory of evolution is full of contradictions, resulting in debates and arguments among evolutionists. Coyne says these controversies prove how strong the theory is.
This is just amazing! There are controversies precisely because the theory is wrong. He says all the people who believe in evolution really believe in evolution (they just believe other believers in evolution are wrong). The fact that there is so much ignorance and controversy about evolution proves how true it must be.
Critics of evolution seize upon these controversies, arguing that they show something is wrong with the theory of evolution itself. But this is specious. There is no dissent among serious biologists about the major claims of evolutionary theory—only about the details of how evolution occurred, and about the relative roles of various evolutionary mechanisms. Far from discrediting evolution, the “controversies” are in fact the sign of a vibrant, thriving field. What moves science forward is [sic] ignorance, debate, and the testing of alternative theories with observations and experiments. A science without controversy is a science without progress. 22
If it is true that debate about evolution promotes scientific progress, why is it that evolutionists go to court to prevent debate about evolution from being discussed in American public schools?
Only a total moron would think we have a fish as a common ancestor.
So who is the guy in this video, Avante?Surely you can answer this simple question about this video you posted and definitely watched.
because you just jump from one video to one of the "recommended videos" on the right side. just like this one
![]()
So how come there are so many all telling you evolution is a fairy tale?
Why do you keep totally ignoring what you are being told in those videos? You never actually try to argue anything you just....he's this guy...or..he's a Christian.
Dude, none of those guys would be dumb enought to try and use a hail mary pass as an example for anything....hahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
spurraider, sorry you wasted your time in school, it's real obvious you learned..0.
lol changing the topic.
you started from "how do i know all these videos." i called your bull and you start rambling about something else.
keep changing the topic. how come you never actually make an argument? you just post videos. the only words you actually "contribute" are "evolution is stupid hahahahaha. only an idiot wont see it"
you never actually bring anything of value to the table
You didn't call me on anything, you keep totally ignoring...."this is an old argument, been done many times, seen all those videos before"....ok? So you were wrong as usual.
What more can be said? You do not get life from non life, it's really just that simple. There was nothing then all of a sudden...life. That's impossible.
To think that did happen and then after millions of years these fish waddled onto dry land and after millio........dude, come on guy, hahahaha!!!!!!!!!! How ing dumb are you?
that is abiogenesis. it's a different discussion than evolution.
evolution is genetic variation in a population over time. abiogenesis is the process of life arising from non-living, organic compounds. i thought this thread was about evolution?
I called you on watching the videos you posted.
You don't watch them.
Why Abiogenesis Is Impossible
If naturalistic molecules-to-human-life evolution were true, multibillions of links are required to bridge modern humans with the chemicals that once existed in the hypothetical “primitive soup”. This putative soup, assumed by many scientists to have given birth to life over 3.5 billion years ago, was located in the ocean or mud puddles. Others argue that the origin of life could not have been in the sea but rather must have occurred in clay on dry land. Still others conclude that abiogenesis was more likely to have occurred in hot vents. It is widely recognized that major scientific problems exist with all naturalistic origin of life scenarios. This is made clear in the conclusions of many leading origin-of-life researchers. A major aspect of the abiogenesis question is “What is the minimum number of parts necessary for an autotrophic free living organism to live, and could these parts assemble by naturalistic means?” Research shows that at the lowest level this number is in the multimillions, producing an irreducible level of complexity that cannot be bridged by any known natural means.
How many music videos have I showed here little man? This thread is about whatever, ok?
So there was nothing, then..LIFE..right? Lets start there. Evolution had to have started there or there was nothing to evolve..ok?
this thread is about evolution. keep the abiogenesis discussion separate
Come on guy, how do we get life out of nothing?
It's about evolution.
You named it Evolution and nothing else and that's what it's about, your cowardly attempts to derail it notwithstanding.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)