You ignore the fact that Paul hit a very tough shot there. I'll take odds on a shot like that versus his percentage at the line, which is near 90%
He made it. happens.
Two point deficit with time or without . Your choice .
You ignore the fact that Paul hit a very tough shot there. I'll take odds on a shot like that versus his percentage at the line, which is near 90%
He made it. happens.
Paul hit a layup he would hit maybe ten to fifteen percent of the time. There are guys that hit half court shots at a higher percentage. Intentionally giving him two free throws in a tie game is beyond re ed. Nobody would do that. The only people that think they would don't understand the benefit of hindsight.
Definitely would not have fouled. Not saying they would have won, but after the shot clock issue, I would have ran a play for a Marco catch and shoot three, even if he had to shoot it a few feet behind the three point line.
Well I was still so shamed and hurt by your genius "wish your Dad had pulled out" slam that I couldn't think straight.
Speaking of thinking straight, read the other posts on this thread and try to educate yourself on the game of basketball. They are trying to help you see the error in your theory. Your idea is so ludicrous that I can't take it seriously.
Ghey. Try again. Doooooooooouche.
He's in Africa right now....obviously the Ebola is deep in his brain for coming up with this.
You never, never, never, never......foul when the game is tied. It's just ludicrous to think otherwise.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)