Reply With Quote
Your phone's almost dead bruv
Look at the company he's in, a lot of great players in league history had similar production, tbh..
Your phone's almost dead bruv
wow..three more years brah.
Lol, now we're not only looking at cherry-picked advanced stats, but combinations of multiple ones adjusted to non-round numbers. Lol, with enough factors, I'm guessing you could make anyone look bad. Good job bro....that must have taken quite a bit of trial and error to finally produce that list.
Look at the company he's in, a lot of great players in league history had similar production, tbh..
All part of the game plan.
Another Parker thread....
If I include all of the relevant advanced metrics, it would look far worse for Parker, actually..B-R only allows 4 or 5 categories in a search..
He literally had one of the worst series' in NBA history..
You morons said that last year too as he was leading the team in scoring and assists. Bbbbbbutt if I take this advanced metric and add that advanced metric and then filter by this advanced metric and use no round numbers, then I can find a list where he is almost the worst in history!If I include all of the relevant advanced metrics, it would look far worse for Parker, actually
He literally had one of the worst series' in NBA history..
If I include all of the relevant advanced metrics, it would look far worse for Parker, actually
love your avi.. lefty
Hahahaha, so let me get this straight. To make Parker look bad, you have to use a combination of not 1, not 2, but 3 ADVANCED metrics...and you want to make him look worse, but to do it you would have to use 5 or more advanced stats on top of each other (with no round numbers). Hahahahahahaha!If I include all of the relevant advanced metrics, it would look far worse for Parker, actually
He literally had one of the worst series' in NBA history..
Hahahaha, so let me get this straight. To make Parker look bad, you have to use a combination of not 1, not 2, but 3 ADVANCED metrics...and you want to make him look worse, but to do it you would have to use 5 or more advanced stats on top of each other (with no round numbers). Hahahahahahaha!If I include all of the relevant advanced metrics, it would look far worse for Parker, actually
He literally had one of the worst series' in NBA history..
thanks bruhit sayz truth bombz
what kind of combination of stats is that tbh
PER is a very well-respected statistical indicator of player production, and WS is a great indicator of a player's impact on his team's performance. However, if that stuff isn't fair to Tony, then let's just look at hard per game stats...
10.9 ppg 3.6 apg 36% FG
Good...God. Those are horrendous numbers for anyone, let alone the star player of a contending team. You honestly don't need any advanced metrics to tell you that those numbers, and his play as a whole were awful. The crazy part is that those numbers only explain half of his shortcomings. Tony was a disaster defensively for almost the entire series.
I will say this though, he was obviously not physically 100%, and I think it's more on Pop for continuing to play him despite the horrible results, and despite the fact that Patty was having the series of his life.
You can use any combo of stats..I chose those because they filter out low-minute and low-usage players..Parker literally ranks near the bottom in almost every advanced metric for rotation playerswhat kind of combination of stats is that tbh
You don't have to combine anything..you can literally choose any advanced metric and he will rank near the bottom..
So, you think Kobe > Duncan, correct?
Yeah bc his raw numbers weren't too. Nobody has to try to make him look bad, he did a great job of that on his own moron.
Apalisoc getting his haters mad as ... they all thought they were finally rid of him
he's joined the welching company tbhApalisoc getting his haters mad as ... they all thought they were finally rid of him
No one ever thought he could keep his word.Apalisoc getting his haters mad as ... they all thought they were finally rid of him
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
