Understandable. And I by no means happen to be acquainted with the particulars in regards to law, and law enforcement etc.
But lets just say for example I have a very hazardous gas, and I know there's a high probability of death (In a matter of months lets just say) if someone is exposed to it. But my intent is to immobilize them, crowd control if you will. And we disperse this gas, knowing death may be a real possibility. How am I not liable for attempted murder if I know the high probability and say, "Well, I really wanted to just make them stop moving, to stop being disorderly". What I'm saying is, despite my intentions, knowing the high probability, is it proper for someone to get the label of "Negligent" as opposed to intent. I think there should be some sort of all inclusive charge. The, "Attempted unprotected sexual activity by one who knows self to be infected with THE HIV (

)" law seems to be unsatisfactory. To me there's no need to go out of their way to create a new label unless there's some sort of loophole that I'm missing.