Spurs: Relevance...

[Thread]

Relevant NBA Playoffs stat: Teams leading 3-2 in a best-of-7 win the series 85.9 percent of the time.

Make that 85.8 percent of the time now.

Ha!!!

[100%duncan]

As long as TD is the greatest of his generation

[Thread]

As long as TD is the greatest of his generation

That's newspaper pablum, %. I don't do that. It's my religion.

[Agloco]

True stat:

Teams not in the playoffs win 0% of their series.

Source: the deep recesses of Cullys ass

[Thread]

True stat:

Teams not in the playoffs win 0% of their series.

Source: the deep recesses of Cullys ass

Thank you for confirming my hypothesis, Aggy.

[100%duncan]

That's newspaper pablum, %. I don't do that. It's my religion.

You wouldn't because you know it's true. If it was Kobe you'd be all over it!!!

lmaovictoriousao!

[Thread]

You wouldn't because you know it's true. If it was Kobe you'd be all over it!!!

lmaovictoriousao!

I don't predicate my via someone's else's judgment. I'm self contained. The incredible shrinking man!!!

[VBM]

How about teams leading 3-1?

[100%duncan]

I don't predicate my via someone's else's judgment. I'm self contained. The incredible shrinking man!!!

As long as TD is the greatest of his generation, you can say anything you want and I'll have nary a problem my friend.

[Thread]

How about teams leading 3-1?

How bout the % when they're selling your le gear on TV? tee, hee.

[Thread]

As long as TD is the greatest of his generation, you can say anything you want and I'll have nary a problem my friend.

What a dork.

[Bynumite]

Relevant NBA Playoffs stat: Teams leading 3-2 in a best-of-7 win the series 85.9 percent of the time.

Make that 85.8 percent of the time now.

Ha!!!

86% and Jim managed to the bed twice in the last 3 years after being up 3-2. Truly an overrated sack of

[Thread]

86% and Jim managed to the bed twice in the last 3 years after being up 3-2. Truly an overrated sack of

Mighty

[ambchang]

86% and Jim managed to the bed twice in the last 3 years after being up 3-2. Truly an overrated sack of

Teams who are up 3-1 win the series 92% of the time.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/...1_LAL-PHO.html

EDIT: Not to mention the Lakers were up 3-2 after 5 games. Just thought I'd make it apparent.

[Arnold Toht]

Let's see here...

>80% he'd win in 2012 after being up 2-0 on OKC
86% he'd win the first round after being up 3-2
99.9% he'd win the le after they were selling his championship shirts and DVD on TV

And he came out of it with 1 out of 4. What a got.

[Thread]

Let's see here...

>80% he'd win in 2012 after being up 2-0 on OKC
86% he'd win the first round after being up 3-2
99.9% he'd win the le after they were selling his championship shirts and DVD on TV

And he came out of it with 1 out of 4. What a got.

Arn

[Bynumite]

Teams who are up 3-1 win the series 92% of the time.

http://www.basketball-reference.com/...1_LAL-PHO.html

Kobe wasn't the defending champion though.

[Arnold Toht]

And don't forget 8. Losing as the #1 overall seed. What is the frequency of that, 5%?

[DMX7]

Relevant NBA Playoffs stat: Teams leading 3-2 in a best-of-7 win the series 85.9 percent of the time.

Make that 85.8 percent of the time now.

Ha!!!

Teams leading 3-2 usually aren't the 6th seed to begin with.

[Arnold Toht]

And don't forget getting swept by the Nash Suns. Or losing in 5 to the 6th seeded Mavs. What's that, 1 out of 7? Ha ha.

[Thread]

Teams leading 3-2 usually aren't the 6th seed to begin with.

That was solely your choice. Your regrets are your own.

[Thread]

And don't forget getting swept by the Nash Suns. Or losing in 5 to the 6th seeded Mavs. What's that, 1 out of 7? Ha ha.

Arn

[Arnold Toht]

And if you go back a year further, this happened:

[Thread]

And if you go back a year further, this happened:

Arn

[DMX7]

That was solely your choice. Your regrets are your own.

No, we didn't choose that, lol. This team was banged up with the regular season and the Western Conference was historically strong in comparison to the East this year. It is what it is.