10. So the bottom cellars were extra bad. This might lower the accomplishment of 72-10 but it didn't alter the Bulls chances of winning/losing in the Playoffs
9. He probably should have gotten the Wiz into the Playoffs one of those seasons
2002: 37-45, Jordan played 60 games, Rip Hamilton, Chris Whitney & Leattner
2003: 37-45, Jordan played 82 games, Stackhouse, Hughes & Laettner
Wiz had 25 wins in 2004 & 19 wins in 2001
8. He was ball hog. Meh
7. Didn't get past the 1st Round without Pippen. Honestly impressive to even make the Playoffs in the mid 80's East
6. MJ defeated overrated teams in the Finals. Disagreed, felt Suns were very strong. 91 Lakers were the only push over. As someone on here illustrated a couple days ago: Jordan was the underdog twice in the Finals. Only favorite twice. That tells me quality opponents. Author says 80's Jazz were better than 90's Jazz? No
5. Not a great playmaker? Huh
4. Constantly lost in the 80s. Yup, he wasn't good enough and the other teams were loaded
3. Other players have GOAT arguments. Agreed
2. 1998 was a very weak season. Isn't this argument #10 again? Who cares how bad the bottom cellars were
1. 1994 Bulls weren't much weaker without MJ. The roster added a-lot of pieces in 1994. Team digressed in 1995 and needed MJ's return to propel the team up the standings [34-31 when MJ returned. Team finished 13-4]

Reply With Quote















