Reply With Quote
But but but the Duggar's are child molesters!
....is a vehemently anti-gay church:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-marriage.html
boutons_deux Blake FuzzyLumpkinsHillary Clinton's charity accepted a substantial donation from an anti-gay African church which has likened sexuals to the Devil, Daily Mail Online can reveal. The 2016 Presidential candidate took money for her sprawling health nonprofit from the Cameroon Baptist Convention whose official policy is that being gay 'contradicts God's purpose for human sexuality'.
The devout Christian organization has in the past compared being gay to committing incest and human trafficking. Its leaders have also railed against US attempts to promote gay rights in Cameroon.this !
But but but the Duggar's are child molesters!
But but but the Duggar's are child molesters!
Totally different situations.
It's funny that you think there is a big Hillary Clinton following in this forum.
There's hardly a big following for neocons on here either, yet Boutons rushes to spam his DailyKos, Alternet and Huffpo links whenever they say something stupid.
So your goal is to be the libertarian buttons?
Nope. I'm just checkin' assholes.
No you're not. You're just an libertarian Internet bag
Is this meant to be surprising? Of course Hillary receives big backing from assholes, just like all the other conservative candidates (yes Hillary is conservative, before you ask.)
I guess all the truthbombs I post make you - dare I say it - emotional?
To be fair, you think everyone to the right of Karl Marx is a conservative
Not everyone. In US politics though, only Sanders is a real non-conservative. Warren maybe. Obama started off well but fell into the capitalist trap too easily. Hillary may as well run as the GOP candidate.To be fair, you think everyone to the right of Karl Marx is a conservative
Moderate GOP....which does not exist in the GOP itselfHillary may as well run as the GOP candidate.
THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING!
a hypocritical politician?....is a vehemently anti-gay church:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-marriage.html
boutons_deux Blake FuzzyLumpkins
No whey....
It's funny that you think there won't be when she gets the demorat nomination, tbh.
It'll be nice to see you gots spin this then... or maybe you'll just do what you did with the community organizer and stick your head in the sand every time a story came out that revealed the inner communist in your precious barry.
Either way, LOL.
Damn.
Maybe you could tell us all what the big deal is here.
lol you were so wrong about det.or maybe you'll just do what you did with the community organizer and stick your head in the sand every time a story came out that revealed the inner communist in your precious barry.
So sexuals are no different than human traffickers?
That was not my question, so put away your straw.
What is the big deal here? You're acting like it's going to hurt Clinton's chances at becoming president or something.
So Democrats are phobes?
Do you only deal in logical fallacies?
The big deal here is that the LGBT community is going to be full of when they're attacking Republican candidates for their stances on sexuality while at the same time fully supporting Clinton even though she accepts donations from people who think sexuals are no different from human traffickers. , if anything, the ing hypocrites in the LGBT community should be more outraged at the Clinton for accepting those donations than they should be at the Republican candidates.
Last edited by SupremeGuy; 06-05-2015 at 08:14 PM.
Answer the question. This isn't a thread about fallacies. This thread is about accepting donations from people who believe sexuals are no different from sex traffickers. Did you really need someone to explain that to you?
Last edited by SupremeGuy; 06-05-2015 at 08:14 PM.
These were not campaign donations.
At all.
That's a really basic mistake. Did you read the article?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
