One of the Clinton Foundation's biggest donors....

[SupremeGuy]

These were not campaign donations.

At all.

That's a really basic mistake. Did you read the article?

Oops.

My bad, I was watching TV and talking to my girlfriend while typing that out. Someone must have mentioned campaign donors.

[ChumpDumper]

Oops.

My bad, I was watching TV and talking to my girlfriend while typing that out. Someone must have mentioned campaign donors.

Where do you think Cameroon is?

[SupremeGuy]

These were not campaign donations.

At all.

That's a really basic mistake. Did you read the article?

Ok, fixed. Simple mistake. Don't try to derail the thread because of it, chump.

[ChumpDumper]

Answer the question. This isn't a thread about fallacies. This thread is about accepting donations from people who believe sexuals are no different from sex traffickers. Did you really need someone to explain that to you?

Considering the work the Clinton Foundation does with HIV/AIDS, it looks like the foundation had more of an influence on this donor than the other way around.

Taking that into account along with the fact that this was a charitable donation to a charity, I ask again: What's the big deal here?

[SupremeGuy]

Considering the work the Clinton Foundation does with HIV/AIDS, it looks like the foundation had more of an influence on this donor than the other way around.

Taking that into account along with the fact that this was a charitable donation to a charity, I ask again: What's the big deal here?

So sexuals are no different than human traffickers?

[ChumpDumper]

Accepting a donation doesn't mean a person involved with the foundation automatically takes on all the traits and beliefs of the donor. Otherwise Clinton would become a Cameroon Baptist the second the check was cashed.

That's a textbook fallacy.

Is that all you have?

[SupremeGuy]

If one of Clinton's biggest donors referring to sexuals as no different than sex traffickers is a non-story to you, then that's on you. I guess we're not going to see you post stories about Christians in America and their beliefs on sexuality anymore, since from this thread, it's a non-story to you. At least we established that, so this thread was a good thing.

[ChumpDumper]

If one of Clinton's biggest donors referring to sexuals as no different than sex traffickers is a non-story to you, then that's on you. I guess we're not going to see you post stories about Christians in America and their beliefs on sexuality anymore, since from this thread, it's a non-story to you. At least we established that, so this thread was a good thing.

Holy , you used all the straw in one post.

You still haven't explained why this is a big deal. All you've done is build snarky straw men and proved you didn't read the article.

Why is this a story to you? Try not to be a little girl about it this time. Explain why a Cameroon Baptist group's giving money to a Clinton charity that does a lot of work with HIV/AIDS is such a major thing that is very important to you.

[unleashbaynes]

Hillary is a tbh......just ask Yoko Ono..