Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Believe. Malik Hairston's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    11,370
    According to SRS + Finals odds, here they are:

    1. 1981 Rockets -0.2 SRS(12th in the NBA)
    2. 1999 Knicks 1.45 SRS(13th in the NBA) and +400 underdogs in the Finals
    3. 2001 76ers 3.63 SRS(7th in the NBA) and +1800 underdogs in the Finals, biggest longshot in league history
    4. 2007 Cavs 3.33 SRS(7th in the NBA) and +500 underdogs in the Finals
    5. 2010 Celtics 3.37 SRS(10th in the NBA) and +200 underdogs in the Finals

    HM: 1986 Rockets and 2002 Nets, just missed the cut

    Excluded the 1995 Rockets since they were underwhelming during the RS for obvious reasons..

    Agree/Disagree with any?

  2. #2
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    All that #5 had to do was keep Perkins upright. Couldn't do it.

    tee, hee.

    #3,,,when you go to bed with a barrel of , you've nobody to blame but yourself.

    Yeah, #1,,,ringer for Boston. Sweet if you can get one as you did at #4.

  3. #3
    36/7/7
    My Team
    Dallas Mavericks
    Post Count
    5,892
    Still believe Orlando would've beaten LA in 2010 if it weren't for that Celtics fluke run.

  4. #4
    notthewordsofonewhokneels Thread's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    91,195
    Still believe Orlando would've beaten LA in 2010 if it weren't for that Celtics fluke run.
    That's the one where Cowherd changed over to the Celtics..."I'm en led to this since I have a talk show."

  5. #5
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,573
    The west had a terrible showing in 99,03,05,07 and 14

  6. #6
    coffee is for closers Infinite_limit's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,148
    Still believe Orlando would've beaten LA in 2010 if it weren't for that Celtics fluke run.

  7. #7
    Veteran Arcadian's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    9,423
    I was surprised that you didn't include the 2015 Cavs. Where do you place them? Are you just waiting for the series to end before making a final judgment?

  8. #8
    coffee is for closers Infinite_limit's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    8,148
    I was surprised that you didn't include the 2015 Cavs. Where do you place them? Are you just waiting for the series to end before making a final judgment?
    Without Irving, I'd say 2001 Sixers would be a good series. George Lynch & Aaron McKie guard James. No one to guard Allen and I actually think Snow would have a nice showing.

    I'm surprised the 99 Knicks are lower. I think NYC would prevail over Cavs

  9. #9
    Shootin' like Ed O'Bannon Darius McCrary's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    2,684
    According to SRS + Finals odds, here they are:

    1. 1981 Rockets -0.2 SRS(12th in the NBA)
    2. 1999 Knicks 1.45 SRS(13th in the NBA) and +400 underdogs in the Finals
    3. 2001 76ers 3.63 SRS(7th in the NBA) and +1800 underdogs in the Finals, biggest longshot in league history
    4. 2007 Cavs 3.33 SRS(7th in the NBA) and +500 underdogs in the Finals
    5. 2010 Celtics 3.37 SRS(10th in the NBA) and +200 underdogs in the Finals

    HM: 1986 Rockets and 2002 Nets, just missed the cut

    Excluded the 1995 Rockets since they were underwhelming during the RS for obvious reasons..

    Agree/Disagree with any?
    The 2001 76ers are probably the best of all those and only look like such underdogs because of the pure nastiness of the 2001 Lakers.
    That 2001 sixers team was great defensively, rebounding, and moderately deep.

  10. #10
    Veteran Thebesteva's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    12,201
    Still believe Orlando would've beaten LA in 2010 if it weren't for that Celtics fluke run.
    sure

  11. #11
    RNS InTheCrust's Avatar
    My Team
    San Antonio Spurs
    Post Count
    523
    The west had a terrible showing in 99,03,05,07 and 14
    But not 13 Mitch? Not 13?

  12. #12
    Executive Mitch's Avatar
    My Team
    Los Angeles Lakers
    Post Count
    6,573
    But not 13 Mitch? Not 13?
    I liked the Spurs that year

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •