No, you can compare Lebron's first part of his career vs. DK's first part, it's fair and close..I'd have DK > Lebron in part 1 due to Lebron's failure in 2011, but still, it's fair..
So Kome can compare to LeBron.
Hayters.
No, you can compare Lebron's first part of his career vs. DK's first part, it's fair and close..I'd have DK > Lebron in part 1 due to Lebron's failure in 2011, but still, it's fair..
Hair, you already cast James & the Cavs down.
You pussy, you.
It's an outrage, Hair.
I was wrong about the Cavs, Cul..it happens, despite my reputation for being near-perfect, I'm not Fkla or TimmytoZo, tbh..
Okay, Hair. Your capitulation is duly noted.
He's chucking and the Warriors are choking... but still very impressed with his play. I'm just not looking forward to the next 30 years of discussion about how lebron single handily won the NBA in 2015 or whatever they'll spout -.-
^ I seriously wish somebody would explain "choking" to me. Really. I want to know.
Missing a free throw with the championship on the line.
Missing an open layup with the championship on the line.
Airballing a putback with the championship on the line.
Blowing a 2-0 series lead and not even making it to game 7.
See: Bryant in 2004 and 2008.
No, you compare prime to prime.
Jordan's first run of dominance > Jordan's second run
Lebron's 2nd run of dominance > Lebron's 1st run.
And yet you are saying Lebron's 2nd run is comparable to Jordan's 2nd run, therefore they are comparable, and throwing out their 1st runs entirely.
and what happened to:
What are you qualifying as Lebron's "1st run"?
And the thread/picture I posted is about the first 3 games of the Finals..
1st run would be the first part in which you defined it. If there is no first run, all the more reason to compare prime to prime.
It also doesn't matter what graphic you pulled, you explicitly said three games (and I even took it as three consecutive games), you never said 1st three games.
I'm talking about the manifestation of the "malady." I ain't talking result. That is subjective.
What did I define as "1st run"? Be more clear..
And the graphic clearly says "first", sorry I forgot to include 1 word in the OP..this dude and his reaching..
The 1st run is really up for you to decide, you can call it first part, first half, first stage, whatever you want to call it, but the first run of Lebron's career is clearly less impressive than his 2nd run, and yet Jordan's 1st run was more impressive than his own second run, comparing the weaker phase of a player to a stronger phase of another player isn't apples to apples.
As for the graphic, I am looking at the thread, and then the text. The graphic takes lowest priority because I am not even sure if you just want to take it from somewhere without editing it. You could be extrapolating it to include all 3 game stretches in finals.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)