Reply With Quote
You're either terrible at making a point or making a terrible point. Pick one.
Again, why is it ok to be bigoted towards Christians but not towards trannies? It's a simple question, why can't you answer it?
No you didn't. You just stated they have a history of doing it.
Put down the bad jokes and lay out the exact agenda you see here from vanity fair regarding jenner.
You're either terrible at making a point or making a terrible point. Pick one.
Again, why is it ok to be bigoted towards Christians but not towards trannies? It's a simple question, why can't you answer it?
Progressive iden y politics is imagined? Do you have the slightest clue what you're talking about, or is this Hamlet pt. 2?
LMAO!!!!! Classic and signature worthy.
Christians want to push their religious ideals on other people, which means ting on gays and transgenders. Trans don't want to be on.
This is pretty common knowledge. Where have you been.
goal post move. You also struggle with logical fallacies.
It's common knowledge that all Christians push their ideals onto others? All of them? I've never been accosted by a Christian who's been trying to proselytize. Dunno where you've been.
You don't think that certain activists/academics push iden y politics down the throats of people who disagree with that philosophy? Have you ever been to a university? SAC doesn't count btw.
Crofl goal post move.
Crying goal post move doesn't work when the is written down for all to see. But nice work channeling your inner RG. What's next, the chart of all logical fallacies?
Last edited by vy65; 06-10-2015 at 03:02 PM.
Holy Blake. I know you and I disagree on some , but the amount you've shat this bed is ing embarrassing.
Actually many of them do. Sick ers.
Keep in mind, you're arguing with someone who has a humiliation fetish, he literally gets off on this sort of thing.
What, because a krew of butthurt fools called me names?
You should be embarrassed of your use of logical fallacies and that I had to define hypocrisy for you.
I'm still not sure you get it.
i clearly stated the types of policy pushing Christians I'm talking about.
it's way too much of a grind to have to stop our discussion for me to have to point out your fallacies and failure to understand middle school words.
Let me know when you've found that lefty agenda in vanity fair you're so sure exists.
I'll keep this sex fantasy post in mind when I'm arguing with you in the future.
No. Because you've been wrong on the merits since the beginning.
The only name calling and butthurt is coming from you. The rest are just calling a man a man.
Blake what EXACTLY makes Jenner a woman?
lol merits.
Get to work on that agenda.
Speaking of goal post moving, this doesn't respond to anything I've said. You can sit back andlogical fallacies
Saying "its too much of a grind" is you either being lazy or stupid or both. You can
Several posters itt have repeatedly said that the VF is a flash point for the progressive's trend towards iden y politics. You've got nothing to say to that other than
Srsly, Blake, in order to have a point here you have to prove:
A) the VF piece is completely isolated from any sort of cultural/social movement towards accepting people of any type of racial/social/sexual iden y.
B) That those iden y politics activists are hermetic and don't try to have their views accepted by society writ large -- basically that their activists without any activism.
C) Assuming you can't prove A) and B), that it's somehow ok for tranny activists to push for social acceptance of their views while it's simultaneously not ok for christian's to push theirs. That basically it's ok to be a tranny but not a christian.
You got some work to do ....
Tldr. Where's the agenda you claim exists?Speaking of goal post moving, this doesn't respond to anything I've said. You can sit back and
Saying "its too much of a grind" is you either being lazy or stupid or both. You can
Several posters itt have repeatedly said that the VF is a flash point for the progressive's trend towards iden y politics. You've got nothing to say to that other than
No, you got work to do. You claim agenda for this piece on Jenner. Let's see it.Srsly, Blake, in order to have a point here you have to prove:
A) the VF piece is completely isolated from any sort of cultural/social movement towards accepting people of any type of racial/social/sexual iden y.
B) That those iden y politics activists are hermetic and don't try to have their views accepted by society writ large -- basically that their activists without any activism.
C) Assuming you can't prove A) and B), that it's somehow ok for tranny activists to push for social acceptance of their views while it's simultaneously not ok for christian's to push theirs. That basically it's ok to be a tranny but not a christian.
You got some work to do ....
Jenner identifies as a female, dresses like one, starting to look like one. No problem with calling her a woman.
Why is it such a big deal for you not to?
Rofl no. seriously, rofl.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
