There's no pivoting.
Not all the evidence is in. Probably will never be completely complete.
And that's OK.
I don't know why that makes people like you melt down and start angry threads.
I didn't ask you to prove anything.
I'm asking why you feel so threatened by a theory.
There's no pivoting.
Not all the evidence is in. Probably will never be completely complete.
And that's OK.
I don't know why that makes people like you melt down and start angry threads.
There's hundreds of years of evidence that has been discovered, but not a single transitional species. How many more centuries will it take to find evidence of evolution, chump?
This isnt an angry thread Chumper..just sticking and moving with the facts my friend
Who knows knows? We really haven't been looking that long. And as you agreed, the transitional animal could be making up part of the computer you're using.
Go ahead and tell us your theory of the development of life and provide all your evidence for it.
I'll wait for you.
Just copying and pasting.
All we're asking for is one.
Hey, I'm waiting for just one messiah to return.
If it doesn't happen before I go to work tomorrow, there is no God.
Deal?
The truth
Science is fine with uncertainty. That's why there is science.
Defend your position dont pivot
So you admit you dont yet have any evidence to present to support evolution, and you admit that you have no eta, because for all you know my computer ate your homework.
Sounds like case closed for the time being. Try again in the next century?
i just showed you how stupid your demands are.
There is plenty of evidence to support evolution.
And try as you might, you can't close the case.
Now tell me what your theory of the development of life is and provide all your evidence for it.
Or is thatcase closed
forever?
Only when presented with it's own bull ....
No, science came about because there was and is uncertainty.
lol just the word science makes you insane.
While those that believe a higher power that controls everything are living in reality.
Something doesn't seem right. I mean I'm sure evolution is what happened so I'm sure they have some of these transitional fossils somewhere. Maybe at the Smithsonian.
But science, as it is based on empirical evidence, does not support your theory. So how does science arise in the issue of proving evolution? Quick answer: it doesnt.
Sure it does. It's just not complete. Science is all about making and testing theories.What do you mean by "arise"?So how does science arise in the issue of proving evolution? Quick answer: it doesnt.
Like Jesus?
I can't help but notice you are completely silent about your personal theory of the development of life.
If you have none, that's cool. Don't get angry at the people who do.
not believing in evolution.
Do people know that dogs are practically living proof of evolution? Dog breeds, anyone? Selective breeding, different species forming out of traits inherited from other species.
Religious people.
how does that equal a fish turning into a rat into a lemur into a monkey into a human?
lol you think that is the theory of evolution?
No ing wonder.
Even chump knows that dogs cross breeding has never resulted in a new species which can no longer be classified as a dog. This is common sense stuff.
it is. a very loose way of defining it but when it comes down to it that's what the theory defines.
First, humans are more related to apes than monkeys (shares most of the same DNA, very little differences), and monkeys are different.
Second, humans are not related to apes as we know them now, nor is it always progressively reaching a higher point up the ladder of species. Think billions of years, what we know as "apes" now varied differently through the years of living. What we, and our ancenstors evolved from, are vastly different species than what we see today.
Evolution has nothing to do with fish turning into rats or vice versa.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)