Reply With Quote
So who here can show me any evidence of any kind that one creature evolved into another? Prove it!
We have never found a fossil in a stage of that evolvutionary process. How come?
How did the designer design a wolf, and why?
So who here can show me any evidence of any kind that one creature evolved into another? Prove it!
We have never found a fossil in a stage of that evolvutionary process. How come?
So who here can show me any evidence of any kind that one designer designed all life on Earth? Prove it!
Tons of this sort of thing out there...
Some parts of evolution are fact. Adaptation being one. But there is no evidence of species turning into other species. In fact the fossil record clearly shows at one level, no life, then a explosion of fully formed creatures on the next level. What did they say about that to make a square fit into a circle? What was it called?
Man has never created anything more complex as even the most simple cells in existance today. Personaly I think everything around us screams creation. Good luck in your studies. I hope you find what you are looking for.
That is not evidence of anything.
Theee is no end to this...
The process of natural selection is not an evolutionary process. The DNA in plants and animals allows selective breeding to achieve desired results. Dogs are a good example of selective breeding. The DNA in all dogs has many recessive traits. A desired trait can be produced in dogs by selecting dogs with a particular trait to produce offspring with that trait. This specialized selective breeding can continue for generation after generation until a breed of dog is developed. This is the same as the "survival of the fittest" theory of the evolutionists. Many different types of dogs can be developed this way, but they can never develop a cat by selectively breeding dogs. Natural selection can never extend outside of the DNA limit. DNA cannot be changed into a new species by natural selection. The same process of selective breeding is done with flowers, fruits, and vegetables. New variations of the species are possible, but a new species has never been developed by science. In fact, the most modern laboratories are unable to produce a left-hand protein as found in humans and animals. Evolutionist fail to admit that no species has ever been proven to have evolved in any way. Evolution is simply pie-in-the-sky conjecture without scientific proof.If natural selection were true,
Eskimos would have fur to keep warm, but they don't. They are just as hairless as everyone else. If natural selection were true, humans in the tropics would have silver, reflective skin to help them keep cool, but they don't. They have black skin, just the opposite of what the theory of natural selection would predict. If natural selection were true humans at northern la udes would have black skin, but they have white skin instead, except the Eskimos who have skin that is halfway between white and black. The people from Russia and the Nordic countries have white skin, blood hair and blue eyes. This is the opposite of what one would predict if natural selection controlled skin color. Many evolutionists argue that melanin is a natural sunscreen that evolved in a greater amount to protect dark-skinned people who live near the Equator. They simply ignore the fact that dark-skinned Eskimos live north of the Arctic Circle. Melanin in the skin is not a sound argument in favor of evolution. Dark-skinned people have always lived near the Equator, not white-skinned people, even though the dark skin is more uncomfortable in the hot, sunny climate. Black skin absorbs the heat from the sun's rays more than white skin. Humans show no sign of natural selection based on the environment. The theory of natural selection is wrong because it cannot create something in the DNA that wasn't there in the beginning.Animals like bears, tigers, lions, and zebras living near the equator have heavy fur while humans living north of the Artic Circle have bare skin. A leopard from the jungle near the equator has fur like the snow leopard of the Himalayas. The snow leopard grows thicker hair but the jungle leopard would also if moved to a cold climate. Horses and dogs grow a heavy winter coat in colder climates. Natural selection isn't working as falsely claimed by Charles Darwin.
Hey, a wall of text.
Why can't you guys ever use your own words?
You just mindlessly copy and paste.
So much of that above type stuff out there, TONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We have never ever found one fossill showing any creature in a tansitional stage, so how in the did evolution occur?
I challenge anyone out there to show me one fossill proving evokution. One fossill in a transtional stage.
Just as much if not more supporting evolution.
You've never seen an atom split, so nuclear bombs can't be real either, right?We have never ever found one fossill showing any creature in a tansitional stage, so how in the did evolution occur?
I challenge you to show me anything proving design. One actual shred of proof, not the projection of a tiny mind that can't think of anything else.I challenge anyone out there to show me one fossill proving evokution. One fossill in a transtional stage.
This thread is about how only idiots believe in evolution, it has ...0...do with religion. That is for another thread.
Avante runs away again.
Expected.
So who out there can show me a fossil that shows a creature in a transitional stage?
How anyone could buy that obvious bull amazes me.
So who out there can show me proof that we were all designed?
Oh look, he can't even post them in order.
lol bible quote
So all creatures can be traced back to sea creatures, yet there isn't one fossill that has ever shown anything evolving into something else.
So how can evolution be true, well?
Remember me saying only idiots could buy this evolution bull ? Just look at this freak following me around, is that one totally ed up individual or what? You totally ignore him and he still can't take a hint, pathetic.
Here he comes again, I gurantee it.
You followed me into this thread.
Watch you will follow me in this post again and not ignore me like you always say you will, I guarantee it.
Dogs and wolves only began to diverge about 15,000 years ago. Life has been on earth for billions of years.
Cool...now billions of years and not a single....NOT A SINGLE Transitional Fossil?
Cool...now billions of years and not a single....NOT A SINGLE Transitional Fossil?
If we are going to be told that all us creatures evolved from a lesser life form, we need to see the steps/stages taken to prove that actually happened. Where are those fossils showing us the steps/stages of that evolutioninary process? Where are these fossils needed to prove it actually happened?
Since we have never seen even...one....make that...ONE!...where is the proof of evolution?
Cool...now billions of years and not a single....NOT A SINGLE Transitional Fossil?Lazy re s
Now come on back with more failed lazy Christian arguments and push this this thread to twenty pages. Go.At least hundreds, possibly thousands, of transitional fossils have been found so far by researchers. The exact count is unclear because some lineages of organisms are continuously evolving.
Here is a short list of transitional fossils do ented by Prothero and that add to the mountain of evidence for Charles Darwin's theory. A lot of us relate most to fossils of life closely related to humans, so the list focuses on mammals and other vertebrates, including dinosaurs...........
http://m.livescience.com/3306-fossil...in-theory.html
I see no transitional fossils there.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
