classhole
every time we start having a normal chat you break down my nig
the bible![]()
classhole
every time we start having a normal chat you break down my nig
im not breaking down son. what is the significance of those fish? tbh
crofl tbh
lol, whats so funny david?
Maybe because they've evolved to walk on land and breathe air?
Last edited by Silver&Black; 06-16-2015 at 12:43 AM.
You still can't get my name right, for one.
or they never evolved at all and those transitional fossils are full of .
I don't think they breathe air, which makes the amount of time they spend on land even more impressive.
All of them?
Why did god make all those transitional fossils in the first place?
To test your faith?
what transitional fossils? the ones that scientist put in order of which they think they evolved?
![]()
Why did god make them?
IDK tbh...you may be correct.
However, I think they breathe through their skin...like a lot of amphibians do.
Right. Just reading up. They can also breathe through the surface of their mouths and throats as long as they are wet. Then they carry water in chambers around their gills like reverse SCUBA tanks.
That's some awesome .
holly , this IS NOT even a debate anymore. Evolution is fact, our "theory" may not be complete though. You just do not understand the term "theory" in regards to it's application in science. You might as well say Gravity is not a fact either since it is also just a "theory".
Let's first get the word "theory", as it applies to science, in the proper context. It is not just an idea, it is tested EVERY SINGLE TIME a discovery is made.
For example...
You could have a "theory" on how to best pick a winning scratch-off game... I "theorize" that if you pick a scratch-off game within the first 20 numbers of a brand new roll of scratch-offs that you will win more than you spend on the tickets.
That can be tested and, over time, can be proven true or false.
If you buy the first 20 tickets of a scratch-off game and you end up losing more than what you paid for the tickets, my "theory" is proven false.
A "theory" in science is basically just trying to give an explanation for the "fact" of it's existence.
You exist... fact... I "theorize" that some guy had sex with your mom which caused your eventual birth. If it turned out that your mom was artificially inseminated my "theory" would be proven incorrect. It doesn't mean you no longer exist.
Are you getting this yet?
The "theory" of Evolution has withstood over 100 years of scrutiny.... 100+ YEARS!!! All it would take is just 1 deviation to prove the "theory" wrong.... The person who ever found that would win a Nobel prize and be recognized all around the world... We would need to come up with a NEW "theory".... Guess what.... it hasn't happened yet....
The "theory" of evolution is as concrete as the "theory" of gravity.
In conclusion, the word "theory" doesn't quite mean what you probably think it means when it comes to science. The "Theory" of evolution is probably the most robust and tested "theories" in scientific history and still has yet to be disproven. In fact, it is tested more than the "theory" of gravity and has STILL withstood the test of time.
To reiterate, a "THEORY" in regards to science, is just our attempt to EXPLAIN the "FACT". We may not, or ever will, understand the COMPLETE answer, but a "THEORY" is a good start.
With that out of the way, have you even looked up the transitional fossils that we have now? To nitpick at them at this point in time is down right ridiculous.... It is tantamount to having a puzzle with 1,000,000 pieces and we are missing 1,000 but you still say you cant quite make out the picture. You are either disingenuous, refuse to look at the puzzle for what it is, or are just in complete denial... There is no other option.
here, just some transitional fossils for you...
The difference between you creationists assholes and us people who believe in evolution is that if I find an idea to be far fetched, but I don't feel I understand it well, I will actually try to learn about it, because I will suspect that maybe my reluctance to believe is because of a misunderstanding... hence why I continue to read the bible and other holy texts.... which lead to my atheism in the first place. I still read them though because I love shutting people the up who try to preach to me about their magical sky daddy.
you assholes, however, don't even bother to learn about evolution and transitional fossils because even if you do understand it, because of your beliefs you will reject it. You know that despite ALL the facts presented, your beliefs take precedent regardless of what facts are given to you....
And you then sit there and ponder why secularist and atheist get so infuriated with you...
Last edited by phyzik; 06-16-2015 at 02:23 AM.
For all the supposed evidence for transitional fossils, that terribly made 2 minute video with cheesy music is the best you guys can do ? Seriously ?
You could always pick up a science book to study it. But you won't.
Seriously? Transitional? All I saw was a bunch of lizard skeletons. That video hauled ass through the pics as well. Showed the same damn lizard skeletons about 5 times. Where are the transitional skeletons from catfish to cows, giraffes, donkeys to apes to man??? There are some massive holes in that .![]()
Evolution isn't a fact. It's just widely accepted by scientist because they would be attacked and discredited if they even so much as said something negative about evolution. Look it up, plenty of scientist are attacked by their peers whenever they speak out against evolution.
ANT*3503. Human Origins. (3-0) 3 Credit Hours.Prerequisite: ANT 1013 or ANT 2033 recommended. The fossil record of human emergence and comparative studies of human evolution. Evolution of social organization, technology, and language development to the end of the Ice Age.
http://www.utsa.edu/ucat/COLFA/ANT.html
Poor victims getting attacked.
What happens to these poor victims who are attacked? Do they cry?
Regarding http://catalog.utsa.edu/undergraduat...criptions/ant/
Yes there are fossil records, but still, too many gaps and missing links. Not convinced.
How long have we been looking for fossils?
What are you convinced of?
well, it's alot older than 6000 years.... That is for sure.... but I will take the bait...
The Earth is Approximately 4.54 Billion years old, give or take.... The universe is approximately 13.77 Billion years old, give or take.
My turn
Do you know how this was measured and not guessed?
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)