Reply With Quote
Chang will defend anything he says to the death. Right or wrong
Feel free to add
Delladova better than Irving
Chang will defend anything he says to the death. Right or wrong
This after Amy took half, after he played for a hometown discount, he has no endorsements (other than HEB**), after unknowingly paying a cool $1 million on a en gym he clearly don't en use:
** "Here, Everybody's a "
That's true. You must understand the power of LeBron to see. On paper it's ridiculous. But if we assume LeBron has infinite energy he's right. Simple economics. LeBron has a compe ive advantage with offense so he should maximize that. Delly is not add good as LeBron on d but it's most efficient to have him max d.
A comparable line-up would be Irving as first option offense with LeBron as defense. If they weren't playing the mvp that might sense but I'd prefer the line-up which guards the opponents best player with a specialist. Plus Irving was injured so it's a moot issue
OP All you are doing is sparking a Kobe bash thread of some sort ...
We will see some passive aggressive thread with some obscure numbers to support a player he like Lebron/Duncan/Moses /bird and bash Kobe.
That's pretty butt hurt of you.Feel free to add
But people who view this as Delladova > Irving is missing the point, it's actually Lebron > Irving, which is true.
Having everything go through Lebron is always the best way to run things, the problem is that it is unsustainable due to exhaustion. In the course of a series though, it is doable (proven), and it makes the Cavs a better team.
The Cavs would be even better off with another defensive minded G in the series, if they can have someone like Tony Allen or Mike Conley in place of Dova, they win the series.
Irving takes away Lebron's offensive touches, and is mediocre defensively. He's great as a sidekick in the regular season to relieve pressure for Lebron on offense, but in the playoffs against a good team, he could be easily neutralized.
This is just low, man, putting in a fake quote with no links whatsoever, and making this the opposite of what I said.This after Amy took half, after he played for a hometown discount, he has no endorsements (other than HEB**), after unknowingly paying a cool $1 million on a en gym he clearly don't en use:
** "Here, Everybody's a "
I think you are reversing the issue.
But I'd be interested in seeing my assertion of having to maximize Lebron on a series is better than having him share workload with Irving.
"LOL NBA - Lakers are back in the hunt"This after Amy took half, after he played for a hometown discount, he has no endorsements (other than HEB**), after unknowingly paying a cool $1 million on a en gym he clearly don't en use:
** "Here, Everybody's a "
Oh wait, that was you, not Amb
"LOL NBA - Lakers are back in the hunt"
Oh wait, that was you, not Amb
Sounds like you are implying that losing $25 million to Duncan't is nothing, because he is such a boss. Amirite?
How did I imply that? I specifically said the direct opposite.Sounds like you are implying that losing $25 million to Duncan't is nothing, because he is such a boss. Amirite?
What is true though is that you put in fake quotes. Now you try to spin it.
It's just a disgusting display of spinelessness from you. I already had low expectations for kobestans, but you went through that like Kobe through a shower stall.
As expected ...
You said he lost all that dough and didn't bat an eye. That's an implication son.
For the millionth time, I'm a Laker Fan who roots for Kobe because he IS a Laker. Name on the front > names on the back.
Why so sensitive? You guysabout it? -15 points for being a sensitive little short ass farming beotch.
Ambchang's "Pierce has not been a good defender in his career" take is probably one of the worst I've read from him.
Can you not read? I specifically said it is a lot of cash.You said he lost all that dough and didn't bat an eye. That's an implication son.
For the millionth time, I'm a Laker Fan who roots for Kobe because he IS a Laker. Name on the front > names on the back.
Why so sensitive? You guys
Some people do not look at money as be all and end all, they know what is enough, and even though they lost a lot, they still realize they have more than enough.
I agree, that was bad on my part.
Yes, I can read
I think even Jerry Jones, Mark Cuban, or Donald Trump would be PISSED if they lost $25 million. For you to imply that BAD (Broke Ass Duncan) wouldn't bat an eyelash from losing that kind of cash is stupid. Own your stupidity and we'll move on.
Overall though you're good and I respect you, except when you somehow reel Kobe in the conversation lol.
x1000, problem is, it happens to often.
No, not really. This will be the THIRD time I post it. You have ADHD or something? You have trouble reading more than one sentence at a time?Yes, I can read
I think even Jerry Jones, Mark Cuban, or Donald Trump would be PISSED if they lost $25 million. For you to imply that BAD (Broke Ass Duncan) wouldn't bat an eyelash from losing that kind of cash is stupid. Own your stupidity and we'll move on.
And no, Duncan didn't bat an eyelash, he clearly stated that it's not affecting his decision. He didn't like losing $25M, but it's fine with him because he has enough, and he knows it.
That's boss.
Duncan was as dominant as Shaq.
"Look at these advanced stats! Look at these advanced stats!"
They are true though. I can't help it that you can't understand them.Duncan was as dominant as Shaq.
"Look at these advanced stats! Look at these advanced stats!"
You are wrong for the 3rd time. But I keep forgetting. English is your 2nd language. You don't know any better. I forgive you son.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
